Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T13:20:42.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurement and sources of technical efficiency of land tenure contracts in Ethiopia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2002

Mohamed M. Ahmed ,
Berhanu Gebremedhin ,
Samuel Benin  and
Simeon Ehui
Mohamed M. Ahmed
Affiliation:
LPAP, ILRI, P.O. Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Tel: 251–1–61 32 15. Fax: 251–1–61 18 92. Email: m.m.ahmed@cgiar.org
Berhanu Gebremedhin
Affiliation:
Livestock Policy Analysis Program (LPAP), International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).
Samuel Benin
Affiliation:
Livestock Policy Analysis Program (LPAP), International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).
Simeon Ehui
Affiliation:
Livestock Policy Analysis Program (LPAP), International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The degree to which prevailing land tenure arrangements constrain agricultural productivity, and the sources of inefficiency associated with land tenure systems in sub-Saharan Africa are unresolved. Using a stochastic frontier production function, this paper examines the economic efficiency and the determinants of inefficiency of alternative land tenure arrangements in Ethiopia. The results show that sharecropping and borrowing are less technically efficient than owner-cultivation or fixed rentals due to restrictions imposed on them by landowners and the interactions of the land market with other imperfect and absent input markets. Thus, a policy to facilitate more efficient transactions of land between farmers and functioning of input markets are expected to reduce inefficiencies associated with these tenure systems.

Keywords

Land tenure systemstechnical efficiencyfrontier production functionEthiopia
Type
Theory and Applications
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , July 2002 , pp. 507 - 527
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors would like to acknowledge the effort of Dr. Sarah Gavian in collecting and documenting the data used in this analysis. We are also grateful for the two anonymous reviewers of this journal and to Dr. Garth Holloway for their comments. The usual disclaimer applies. Partial funding for this research was provided by the World Bank.