Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:43:41.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Property rights, tenure security and forest investment incentives: evidence from China's Collective Forest Tenure Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2013

Yuanyuan Yi ,
Gunnar Köhlin  and
Jintao Xu
Yuanyuan Yi
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg, Room L-212, Building L, Vasagatan 1, 411 24 Gothenburg, Sweden. Tel:+46 31 786 2648. Fax:+46 31 786 1326. E-mail: yuanyuan.yi@economics.gu.se
Gunnar Köhlin
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg, Sweden. E-mail: gunnar.kohlin@economics.gu.se
Jintao Xu
Affiliation:
College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, and National School of Development, Peking University, China. E-mail: xujt@pku.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper assesses how tenure reform in China's collective forest sector affects Chinese farmer households’ perception of tenure security and propensity to invest in their forestland. A large database consisting of information from 3,180 households in eight provinces from south to north is used to explore factors correlated with more strongly perceived tenure security and determinants of forest-related investment. The study adds to the limited research testing whether there is endogenous causality between investment and tenure security in forestland, and finds that investment was not undertaken to enhance tenure security. In addition, the data allow for differentiation between perceived tenure security and contracted use and transferability rights. Overall, stronger contracted rights were found to affect investment. China's forest tenure reform – where individual households can manage forestland, empowered by legal certification and stronger contract rights – has thus enhanced tenure security and encouraged forest investment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 19 , Special Issue 1: China's Environmental Policy , February 2014 , pp. 48 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alston, L.J., Libecap, G.D., and Schneider, R. (1995), ‘Property rights and the preconditions for markets: the case of the Amazon frontier’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 151(1): 89–107.Google Scholar
Baland, J.M., Gaspart, F., Place, F., and Platteau, J.P. (1999), ‘Poverty, tenure security and access to land in Central Uganda: the role of market and non-market processes’, Cahiers de Recherche, Faculte des sciences economiques, sociales et de gestion, Namur, Belgium: University of Namur.Google Scholar
Besley, T. (1995), ‘Property rights and investment incentives: theory and evidence from Ghana’, Journal of Political Economy 103(5): 903–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohn, H. and Deacon, R.T. (2000), ‘Ownership risk, investment, and the use of natural resources’, American Economic Review 90(3): 526–549.Google Scholar
Brasselle, A.S., Gaspart, F., and Platteau, J.P. (2002), ‘Land tenure security and investment incentives: puzzling evidence from Burkina Faso’, Journal of Development Economics 67(2): 373–418.Google Scholar
Carter, M.R. and Olinto, P. (2003), ‘Getting institutions “right” for whom? Credit constraints and the impact of property rights on the quantity and composition of investment’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(1): 173–186.Google Scholar
Deaton, A. (1997), The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press (for the World Bank).Google Scholar
Deininger, K. and Chamorro, J.S. (2004), ‘Investment and income effects of land regularization: the case of Nicaragua’, Agricultural Economics 30(2): 101–116.Google Scholar
Deininger, K. and Jin, S. (2006), ‘Tenure security and land-related investment: evidence from Ethiopia’, European Economic Review 50: 1245–1277.Google Scholar
Heckman, J.J. (1990), ‘Varieties of selection bias’, American Economic Review 80: 313–318.Google Scholar
Holden, S.T. and Yohannes, H. (2002), ‘Land re-distribution, tenure insecurity, and intensity of production: a study of farm households in southern Ethiopia’, Land Economics 78(4): 573–590.Google Scholar
Holden, S., Xu, J., and Jiang, X. (2009), ‘Tenure security and forest tenure reforms in China’, Paper presented at the Nordic Conference in Development Economics at Oscarsborg, Drøbak, 18–19 June.Google Scholar
Jacoby, H., Li, G., and Rozelle, S. (2002), ‘Hazards of expropriation: tenure insecurity and investment in rural China’, American Economic Review 92(5): 1420–1447.Google Scholar
Kong, X., Guo, Y., and Li, S. (2006), ‘On the influence of collective forest property reform to economy at village level – a survey report of 15 villages in Yong'an of Fujian Province’, Forestry Economics 10: 17–21 [in Chinese].Google Scholar
Li, K. and Wang, F. (2009), ‘Impact of forestry property right system reform on farmers’ income in Jiangxi Province’, Jiangxi Forestry Science and Technology 4: 49–53 [in Chinese].Google Scholar
Lopez, R. (1997), ‘Land titles and farm productivity in Honduras’, unpublished draft, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
Migot-Adholla, S.E., Benneh, G., Place, F., and Atsu, S. (1994), ‘Land, security of tenure, and productivity in Ghana’, in Bruce, J.W. and Migot-Adholla, S.E. (eds), Searching for Land Tenure Security in Africa, Dubuque, IA: Hendall/Hunt Publishing, pp. 97–118.Google Scholar
Wen, G.J. (1995), ‘The land tenure system and its saving and investment mechanism: the case of modern China’, Asian Economic Journal 9(31): 233–259.Google Scholar
Xie, L., Berck, P., and Xu, J. (2011), ‘The effect of the collective forest tenure reform in China on forestation’, Discussion paper, [Available at] http://ssrn.com/abstract=1782289.Google Scholar
Xu, J. and Jiang, X. (2009), ‘Collective forest tenure reform in China: outcomes and implications’, Paper presented at the World Bank Conference on Land Governance, 9–10 March 2009, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Xu, J., White, A., and Lele, U. (2010), ‘China's forest tenure reforms: impacts and implications for choice, conservation, and climate change’, Publication at the Conference on Forest Tenure and Regulatory Reforms: Experiences, Lessons and Future Steps in Asia, 24–25 September 2010, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Yao, Y. (1995), ‘Institutional arrangements, tenure insecurity and agricultural productivity in post reform rural China’, Discussion paper, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Zhao, S. (2009), ‘Problems incurred in collective forest tenure reform and corresponding measures’, Forest Inventory and Planning 34(3): 120–123 [in Chinese].Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Yi Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Yi Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 280.9 KB