Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:10:20.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing the effects of cultivating genetically modified glyphosate-tolerant varieties of soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) on populations of field arthropods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

Osamu Imura ,
Kun Shi ,
Keiji Iimura  and
Tadashi Takamizo
Osamu Imura*
Affiliation:
Nasu Research Center, National Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science, National Agriculture and Food Organization, 768 Senbonmatsu, Nasushiobara, Tochigi 329-2793, Japan
Kun Shi
Affiliation:
Nasu Research Center, National Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science, National Agriculture and Food Organization, 768 Senbonmatsu, Nasushiobara, Tochigi 329-2793, Japan Present address: The Wildlife Institute, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, P.R. China
Keiji Iimura
Affiliation:
Nasu Research Center, National Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science, National Agriculture and Food Organization, 768 Senbonmatsu, Nasushiobara, Tochigi 329-2793, Japan
Tadashi Takamizo
Affiliation:
Nasu Research Center, National Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science, National Agriculture and Food Organization, 768 Senbonmatsu, Nasushiobara, Tochigi 329-2793, Japan
*
*Corresponding author: imurao@affrc.go.jp

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We assessed the effects of cultivating two genetically modified (GM) glyphosate-tolerant soybean varieties (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) derived from Event 40-3-2 and a Japanese conventional variety on arthropods under field conditions, with weed control using glyphosate and conventional weed control for two years. Plant height and dry weight of the conventional variety were significantly larger than those of the GM varieties, but the GM varieties bore more pods than the conventional variety. We found arthropods of nine taxonomic orders (Araneae, Acari, Thysanoptera, Homoptera, Heteroptera, Coleoptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera, and Hymenoptera) on the plants. The arthropod incidence (number per plant unit weight pooled for each taxonomic order) on the soybean stems and leaves generally did not differ significantly between the GM and conventional varieties. However, the incidence of Thysanoptera and total incidence (all orders combined) were greater on the GM variety in the second year. The weed control regimes had no significant influence on the arthropod incidence on the soybean stems and leaves. The number of flower-inhabiting Thysanoptera (the dominant arthropod in the flowers) was not significantly different between the GM and conventional varieties. Asphondylia yushimai (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) was more numerous on the pods of the GM variety in both years. Neither the soybean variety nor the weed control regime significantly affected the density of soil macro-organisms. However, the glyphosate weed control affected arthropods between the rows of plants by decreasing the abundances of Homoptera, Heteroptera, Coleoptera and Lepidoptera, and diversity of arthropods.

Keywords

biodiversityarthropodsenvironmental impactgenetically modified cropsglyphosateherbicide tolerant cropssoil macro-organismweed control
Type
Research Article
Information
Environmental Biosafety Research , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , April 2010 , pp. 101 - 112
Copyright
© ISBR, EDP Sciences, 2011

References

Albajes, R, Lumbierres, B, Pons, X (2009) Responsiveness of arthropod herbivores and their natural enemies to modified weed management in corn. Environ. Entomol. 38: 944–954 Google ScholarPubMed
Altieri, MA, Todd, JW, Hauser, EW, Patterson, M, Buchanan, GA, Walker, RH (1981) Some effects of weed management and row spacing on insect abundance in soybean fields. Prot. Ecol. 3: 339–343 Google Scholar
Ammann, K (2005) Effects of biotechnology on biodiversity: herbicide-tolerant and insect-resistant GM crops. Trends Biotechnol. 23: 388–394 Google ScholarPubMed
Andow, DA (2003) UK farm-scale evaluations of transgenic herbicide-tolerant crops. Nat. Biotech. 21: 1453–1454 Google ScholarPubMed
Andow, DA, Hilbeck, A (2004) Science-based risk assessment for nontarget effects of transgenic crops. BioScience 54: 637–649 Google Scholar
Andow, DA, Prokrym, DR (1990) Plant structural complexity and host-finding by a parasitoid. Oecologia 82: 162–165 Google ScholarPubMed
Andow, DA, Zwahlen, C (2006) Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants. Ecol. Lett. 9: 196–214 Google ScholarPubMed
Angle, JS (1994) Release of transgenic plants: biodiversity and population-level considerations. Mol. Ecol. 3: 45–50 Google Scholar
Batie, SS, Ervin, DE (2001) Transgenic crops and the environment: missing markets and public roles. Environ. Dev. Econ. 6: 435–457 Google Scholar
Bitzer, RJ, Buckelew, LD, Pedigo, LP (2002) Effects of transgenic herbicide-resistant soybean varieties and systems on surface-active springtails (Entognatha: Collembola). Environ. Entomol. 31: 449–461 Google Scholar
Bourassa, S, Cárcamo, HA, Spence, JR, Blackshaw, RE, Floate, K (2010) Effects of crop rotation and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant corn on ground beetle diversity, community structure, and activity density. Can. Entomol. 142: 143–159 Google Scholar
Brondani, D, Guedes, JVC, Farias, JR, Bigolin, M, Karlec, F, Lopes, SJ (2008) Ocorrência de insetos na parte aérea da soja em função do manejo de plantas daninhas em cultivar convencional e geneticamente modificada resistente a glyphosate. Ciência Rural 38: 2132–2137 Google Scholar
Brooks, DR, Bohan, DA, Champion, GT, Haughton, AJ, Hawes, C, Heard, MS, Clark, SJ, Dewar, AM, Firbank, LG, Perry, JN, Rothery, P, Scott, RJ, Woiwod, IP, Birchall, C, Skellern, MP, Walker, JH, Baker, P, Bell, D, Browne, EL, Dewar, AJG, Fairfax, CM, Garner, BH, Haylock, LA, Horne, SL, Hulmes, SE, Mason, NS, Norton, LR, Nuttall, P, Randle, Z, Rossall, MJ, Sands, RJN, Singer, EJ, Walker, MJ (2003) Invertebrate responses to the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant and conventional spring crops. I. Soil-surface-active invertebrates. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 358: 1847–1862 Google ScholarPubMed
Buckelew, LD, Pedigo, LP, Mero, HM, Owen, MDK, Tylka, GL (2000) Effects of weed management systems on canopy insects in herbicide-resistant soybean. J. Econ. Entomol. 93: 1437–1443 Google Scholar
Butler, SJ, Vickery, JA, Norris, K (2007) Farmland biodiversity and the footprint of agriculture. Science 315: 381–384 Google ScholarPubMed
Cárcamo, HA, Blackshaw, RE (2007) Insect pest incidence and injury to herbicide-tolerant canola in western Canada. Agron. J. 99: 842–846 Google Scholar
Carpenter J, Felsot A, Goode T, Hammig M, Onstad D, Sankula S (2002) Comparative environmental impacts of biotechnology-derived and traditional soybean, corn, and cotton crops. http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/bi430-fs430/Documents-2004/7B-MIN%20TILL%20AG/CAST-ComparEnvImpactGMOCrops-2002.pdf (accessed on 16 February 2009)
Champion, GT, May, MJ, Bennett, S, Brooks, DR, Clark, SJ, Daniels, RE, Firbank, LG, Haughton, AJ, Hawes, C, Heard, MS, Perry, JN, Randle, Z, Rossall, MJ, Rothery, P, Skellern, MP, Scott, RJ, Squire, GR, Thomas, MR (2003) Crop management and agronomic context of the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 358: 1801–1818 Google ScholarPubMed
Conner, AJ, Glare, TR, Nap, J-P (2003) The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Part II. Overview of ecological risk assessment. Plant J. 33: 19–46 Google ScholarPubMed
Convention on Biological Diversity (2000) Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity. The Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal
Craig, W, Tepfer, M, Degrassi, G, Ripandelli, D (2008) An overview of general features of risk assessments of genetically modified crops. Euphytica 164: 853–880 Google Scholar
Crawley, MJ, Hails, RS, Rees, M, Kohn, DD, Buxton, J (1993) Ecology of transgenic oilseed rape in natural habitats. Nature 363: 620–623 Google Scholar
Dale, PJ (2002) The environmental impact of genetically modified (GM) crops: a review. J. Agr. Sci. 138: 245–248 Google Scholar
Dale, PJ, Clarke, B, Fontes, EMG (2002) Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops. Nat. Biotech. 20: 567–574 Google ScholarPubMed
Devos, Y, Cougnon, M, Vergucht, S, Bulcke, R, Haesaert, G, Steurbaut, W, Reheul, D (2008) Environmental impact of herbicide regimes used with genetically modified herbicide-resistant maize. Transgenic Res. 17: 1059–1077 Google ScholarPubMed
Firbank, LG (2003) Introduction. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 358: 1777–1778 Google ScholarPubMed
Firbank, LG, Forcella, F (2000) Genetically modified crops and farmland biodiversity. Science 289: 1481–1482 Google ScholarPubMed
Firbank, LG, Heard, MS, Woiwod, IP, Hawes, C, Haughton, AJ, Champion, GT, Scott, RJ, Hill, MO, Dewar, AM, Squire, GR, May, MJ, Brooks, DR, Bohan, DA, Daniels, RE, Osborne, JL, Roy, DB, Black, HIJ, Rothery, P, Perry, JN (2003) An introduction to the Farm-Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. J. Appl. Ecol. 40: 2–16 Google Scholar
Freckleton, RP, Stephens, PA, Sutherland, WJ, Watkinson, AR (2004) Amelioration of biodiversity impacts of genetically modified crops: predicting transient versus long-term effects. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271: 325–331 Google ScholarPubMed
Hara, M, Ohba, T (1981) On the phytophagous insect resistance in soybean. Japn. J. Crop Sci. Kyushu Div. 48: 65–67 Google Scholar
Hart, SV, Kogan, M, Paxton, JD (1983) Effect of soybean phytoalexins on the herbivorous insects Mexican bean beetle and soybean looper. J. Chem. Ecol. 9: 657–672 Google ScholarPubMed
Haughton, AJ, Champion, GT, Hawes, C, Heard, MS, Brooks, DR, Bohan, DA, Clark, SJ, Dewar, AM, Firbank, LG, Osborne, JL, Perry, JN, Rothery, P, Roy, DB, Scott, RJ, Woiwod, IP, Birchall, C, Skellern, MP, Walker, JH, Baker, P, Browne, EL, Dewar, AJG, Garner, BH, Haylock, LA, Horne, SL, Mason, NS, Sands, RJN, Walker, MJ (2003) Invertebrate responses to the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant and conventional spring crops. II. Within-field epigeal and aerial arthropods. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 358: 1863–1877 Google ScholarPubMed
Hawes, C, Haughton, AJ, Osborne, JL, Roy, DB, Clark, SJ, Perry, JN, Rothery, P, Bohan, DA, Brooks, DR, Champion, GT, Dewar, AM, Heard, MS, Woiwod, IP, Daniels, RE, Young, MW, Parish, AM, Scott, RJ, Firbank, LG, Squire, GR (2003) Responses of plants and invertebrate trophic groups to contrasting herbicide regimes in the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 358: 1899–1913 Google ScholarPubMed
Heard, MS, Hawes, C, Champion, GT, Clark, SJ, Firbank, LG, Haughton, AJ, Parish, AM, Perry, JN, Rothery, P, Roy, DB, Scott, RJ, Skellern, MP, Squire, GR, Hill, MO (2003a) Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. II. Effects on individual species. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 358: 1833–1846 Google ScholarPubMed
Heard, MS, Hawes, C, Champion, GT, Clark, SJ, Firbank, LG, Haughton, AJ, Parish, AM, Perry, JN, Rothery, P, Scott, RJ, Skellern, MP, Squire, GR, Hill, MO (2003b) Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. I. Effects on abundance and diversity. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 358: 1819–1832 Google ScholarPubMed
Heard, MS, Clark, SJ, Rothery, P, Perry, JN, Bohan, DA, Brookes, DR, Champion, GT, Dewar, AM, Hawes, C, Haughton, AJ, May, MJ, Scott, RJ, Stuart, RS, Squire, GR, Fierbank, LG (2006) Effects of successive seasons of genetically modified herbicede-tolerant maize cropping on weeds and invertebrates. Ann. Appl. Biol. 149: 249–254 Google Scholar
Hulburt, DJ, Boerma, HR, All, JN (2004) Effect of pubescence tip on soybean resistance to lepidopteran insects. J. Econ. Entomol. 92: 621–627 Google Scholar
Imura O, Morimoto N (2004) Arthropods. In Japanese Society of Grassland Science, ed, Field and Laboratory Methods for Grassland Science, Zenkoku Noson Kyoiku Kyokai Publ. Co. Ltd., Tokyo, pp 337–340
James C (2009) Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2009. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA), Metro Manila
Jasinski, JR, Eisley, JB, Young, CE, Kovach, J, Wilson, H (2003) Select nontarget arthropod abundance in transgenic and nontransgenic field crops in Ohio. Environ. Entomol. 32: 407–413 Google Scholar
Khan, ZR, Ward, JT, Norris, DM (1986) Role of trichomes in soybean resistance to cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 42: 109–117 Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T (1972) Biology of insect pests of soybean and their control. JARQ (Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly) 6: 212–218 Google Scholar
Kogan, M (1981) Dynamics of insect adaptations to soybean: impact of integrated pest management. Environ. Entomol. 10: 323–371 Google Scholar
Kuiper, HA, Kleter, GA, Noteborn, HPJM, Kok, EJ (2001) Assessment of the food safety issues related to genetically modified foods. Plant J. 27: 503–528 Google ScholarPubMed
Kuwayama S (ed) (1953) Survey on the Fauna of Soybean Insect-Pests in Japan. Yokendo, Tokyo
Lawton, JH (1983) Plant architecture and the diversity of phytophagous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 28: 23–39 Google Scholar
Liu, S, Norris, DM, Hartwig, EE, Xu, M (1992) Inducible phytoalexins in juvenile soybean genotypes predict soybean looper resistance in the fully developed plants. Plant Physiol. 100: 1479–1485 Google ScholarPubMed
Lövei, GL, Arpaia, S (2005) The impact of transgenic plants on natural enemies: a critical review of laboratory studies. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 114: 1–14 Google Scholar
Marvier, M, McCreedy, C, Regetz, J, Kareiva, P (2007) A meta-analysis of effects of Bt cotton and maize on nontarget invertebrates. Science 316: 1475–1477 Google ScholarPubMed
Ministry of Environment (2003) Act on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity through regulations on the use of living modified organisms (Act No. 97 of 2003). Ministry of Environment, http://www.bch.biodic.go.jp/english/law.html
Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Ministry of Environment (2003) The guidance of implementation of assessment of adverse effect on biological diversity of Type-1 Use of living modified organisms. Ministry of Environment. http://www.bch.biodic.go.jp/english/law.html
New TR (1998) Invertebrate Surveys for Conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
OECD (1993) Safety evaluation of foods derived by modern biotechnology – concepts and principle, Paris, p 13
OECD (1998) Report of the OECD workshop on the toxicological and nutritional testing of novel foods, Aussois, p 21
Ohno, K, Takemoto, H (1997) Species composition and seasonal occurrence of Orius spp. (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae), predacious natural enemies of Thrips palmi (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), in eggplant fields and surrounding habitat. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 32: 27–35 Google Scholar
Olson, D, Andow, DA (2008) Patch edges and insect populations. Oecologia 155: 549–558 Google ScholarPubMed
Perry, JN, Rothery, P, Clark, SJ, Heard, MS, Hawes, C (2003) Design, analysis and statistical power of the Farm-Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. J. Appl. Ecol. 40: 17–31 Google Scholar
Powell, JR, Levy-Booth, DJ, Gulden, RH, Asbil, WL, Campbell, RG, Dunfield, KE, Hamill, AS, Hart, MM, Lerat, S, Nurse, RE, Pauls, KP, Sikkema, PH, Swanton, CJ, Trevors, JT, Klironomos, JN (2009) Effects of genetically modified, herbicide-tolerant crops and their management on soil food web properties and crop litter decomposition. J. Appl. Ecol. 46: 388–396 Google Scholar
Price, PW, Bouton, CE, Gross, P, McPheron, BA, Thompson, JN, Weis, AE (1980) Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11: 41–65 Google Scholar
Price, PW, Andrade, I, Pires, C, Sujii, E, Vieira, EM (1995) Gradient analysis using plant modular structure: pattern in plant architecture and insect herbivore utilization. Environ. Entomol. 24: 497–505 Google Scholar
Rosca, II (2004) Impact of genetically modified herbicide resistant maize on the arthropod fauna. Bulletin OILB/SROP 27: 143–146 Google Scholar
Roy, DB, Bohan, DA, Haughton, AJ, Hill, MO, Osborne, JL, Clark, SJ, Perry, JN, Rothery, P, Scott, RJ, Brooks, DR, Champion, GT, Hawes, C, Heard, MS, Firbank, LG (2003) Invertebrate and vegetation of field margins adjacent to crops subject to contrasting herbicide regimes in the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 358: 1879–1898 Google ScholarPubMed
Rudgers, JA, Whitney, KD (2006) Interactions between insect herbivores and a plant architecture dimorphism. J. Ecol. 94: 1249–1260 Google Scholar
Saito, T, Miyata, T (2005) Situation and problems on transgenic technology for insect pest control. Japn. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 49: 171–185 Google Scholar
Saxena, D, Florest, S, Stotzky, G (1999) Insecticidal toxin in root exudates from Bt corn. Nature 402: 480 Google ScholarPubMed
Shirai, Y (2007) Nontarget effect of transgenic insecticidal crops: overview to date and future challenges. Japn. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 51: 165–186 Google Scholar
Smith, CM (1985) Expression, mechanisms and chemistry of resistance in soybean, Glycine max L. (Merr.) to the soybean looper, Pseudoplusia includens (Walker). Insect Sci. Appl. 6: 243–248 Google Scholar
Southwood TRE, Henderson PA (2000) Ecological Methods. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford
Squire, GR, Brooks, DR, Bohan, DA, Champion, GT, Daniels, RE, Haughton, AJ, Hawes, C, Heard, MS, Hill, MO, May, MJ, Osborne, JL, Perry, JN, Roy, DB, Woiwod, IP, Firbank, LG (2003) On the rationale and interpretation of the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 358: 1779–1799 Google ScholarPubMed
Tamura, I (1941) Relationship between morphological characters of soybean and infestation by Asphondylia yushimai. Japn. J. Appl. Zool. 13: 50–52 Google Scholar
Tester, CF (1977) Constituents of soybean cultivars differing in insect resistance. Phytochemistry 16: 1899–1901 Google Scholar
Turnipseed, SG (1977) Influence of trichome variations on populations of small phytophagous insects in soybean. Environ. Entomol. 6: 815–817 Google Scholar
Watkinson, AR, Freckleton, RP, Robinson, RA, Sutherland, WJ (2000) Predictions of biodiversity response to genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Science 289: 1554–1557 Google ScholarPubMed
Yasunaga T, Takai M, Kawasawa T (2001) A Field Guide of Japanese Bugs II – Terrestrial heteropterans. Zenkoku Noson Kyoiku Kyokai Publ. Co. Ltd., Tokyo
Yoshimura, Y, Matsuo, K, Yasuda, K (2006) Gene flow from GM glyphosate-tolerant to conventional soybeans under field conditions in Japan. Environ. Biosafety Res. 5: 169–173 Google ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

OLM - ebr 9(2) 2010 p.101 - Assessing the effects of cultivating genetically...

Appendices 1 to 3

Download OLM - ebr 9(2) 2010 p.101 - Assessing the effects of cultivating genetically...(PDF)
PDF 281.4 KB