Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:01:55.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can methods applied in medicine be used to summarize and disseminate conservation research?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2005

IOAN FAZEY
Affiliation:
Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Building 43, Australian National University, Acton, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
JANET G. SALISBURY
Affiliation:
Biotext, 113 Hopetoun Circuit, Yarralumla, ACT 2600, Australia
DAVID B. LINDENMAYER
Affiliation:
Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Building 43, Australian National University, Acton, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
JOHN MAINDONALD
Affiliation:
Mathematical Sciences Institute, Building 27, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia
ROBERT DOUGLAS
Affiliation:
National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia

Abstract

To ensure that the best scientific evidence is available to guide conservation action, effective mechanisms for communicating the results of research are necessary. In medicine, an evidence-based approach assists doctors in applying scientific evidence when treating patients. The approach has required the development of new methods for systematically reviewing research, and has led to the establishment of independent organizations to disseminate the conclusions of reviews. (1) Such methods could help bridge gaps between researchers and practitioners of environmental conservation. In medicine, systematic reviews place strong emphasis on reviewing experimental clinical trials that meet strict standards. Although experimental studies are much less common in conservation, many of the components of systematic reviews that reduce the biases when identifying, selecting and appraising relevant studies could still be applied effectively. Other methods already applied in medicine for the review of non-experimental studies will therefore be required in conservation. (2) Using systematic reviews and an evidence-based approach will only be one tool of many to reduce uncertainty when making conservation-related decisions. Nevertheless an evidence-based approach does complement other approaches (for example adaptive management), and could facilitate the use of the best available research in environmental management. (3) In medicine, the Cochrane Collaboration was established as an independent organization to guide the production and dissemination of systematic reviews. It has provided many benefits that could apply to conservation, including a forum for producing and disseminating reviews with emphasis on the requirements of practitioners, and a forum for feedback between researchers and practitioners and improved access to the primary research. Without the Cochrane Collaboration, many of the improvements in research communication that have occurred in medicine over the last decade would not have been possible.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2004 Foundation for Environmental Conservation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)