Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:31:35.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Revisionist View of Tropical Deforestation and Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Michael R. Dove
Michael R. Dove
Affiliation:
Senior Fellow, Program on Environment, East–West Center, 1777 East–West Road, Honolulu, Hawaii 96848, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This study critiques one of the prevailing theories of tropical deforestation, namely that the forest is being cleared because its riches have been overlooked (the purported solution to which is the marketing of ‘rainforest crunch’). Edelman's work on the language of ‘helping’ is drawn on to suggest that a focus on the microeconomics of forest dwellers diverts attention from macro-economic and political issues whose impact on the forest is far more serious.

The study begins with a parable from Kalimantan, relating how the discovery of a big diamond can bring misfortune to a poor miner. It is suggested that this parable applies more generally to resource development in tropical forests, and that the major challenge is not to give more development opportunities to forest peoples but to take fewer away.

This principal is illustrated with respect to gold mining, rattan gathering, and truck-farming, in Indonesia. In each case, when a forest resource acquires greater value in the broader society, it is appropriated by external entrepreneurs at the expense of local communities. A detailed case-study is presented of the development of Para Rubber cultivation. Smallholders currently dominate this cultivation, despite steadfast opposition by both contemporary and colonial governments, whose self-interests are better served by the cultivation of the Rubber on large estates.

Each of these cases illustrates the predisposition of political and economic forces in the broader society to take over successful resource development in the tropical forest. Contemporary efforts to develop ‘non-timber forest products’ are reinterpreted, in this light, as attempts to allocate to the forest dwellers the resources of least interest to the broader society. The absence of research in this area is attributed not to academic oversight but to conflicting political-economic interests.

This thesis of resource exploitation is at variance with the ‘rain-forest crunch’ premise: namely that forest reserves are being overexploited by forest dwellers, that this is due to the absence of other sources of income, and that the solution is to help forest dwellers to find such sources. It is suggested that there has been no lack of such sources in the past, and that the problem has been in maintaining the forest peoples' control of them. The lesson of this analysis is not to ignore minor forest products, but to place them — and their potential development value for indigenous forest peoples — clearly within their proper political-economic context.

Any resolution of the problems of tropical forest development and conservation must begin, not by searching for resources that forest dwellers do not already have, but by first searching for the institutional forces which restrict the forest dwellers' ownership and productive use of existing resources. One of these institutional forces is discourse. It is widely understood that state elites seek to control valuable forest resources; it is less widely understood that an important means to this end is the control of resource-related discourse. De-mystification of the current debate over tropical deforestation and development is thus sorely needed.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , Spring 1993 , pp. 17 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) (1985). Smallholder Rubber Production and Policies: Proceedings of an International Workshop held at the University of Adelaide. ACIAR, Canberra, Australia: 151 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Barlow, Colin (1978). The Natural Rubber Industry: Its Development. Technology, and Economy in Malaysia. Oxford University Press, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: xxiv + 500 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Barlow, Colin & Muharminto, (1982). The rubber smallholder economy. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, XVIII(2), pp. 86–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, Colin & Tomich, Thomas (1991). Indonesian agricultural development: the awkward case of smallholder tree crops. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, XXVII(3), pp. 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, P.T. (1948). The Rubber Industry: A Study in Monopoly and Competition. Longmans, Green, London, England, UK: xiii + 404 pp.Google Scholar
Beer, Jenne H. de & McDermott, Melanie J. (1989). The Economic Value of Non-timber Forest Products in Southeast Asia: With Emphasis on Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Netherlands Committee for IUCN, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 175 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Blaikie, Piers (1985). The Political Economy of Soil Erosion in Developing Countries. Longman Inc., New York, NY, USA: 188 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Booth, Anne (1988). Agricultural Development in Indonesia. Asian Studies Association of Australia, Southeast Asia Publications Series No. 16, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, Australia: vii + 295 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Brown, Lester R. (1991). State of the World 1991: A WorldWatch Institute Report on Progress Toward a Sustainable Society. W.W. Norton, New York, NY, USA: xvii + 254 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Burch, Carol-Carmen (1986). Coffee as Cash in Highland Indonesia: Evidence on a Debate. Paper read at the Annual Meeting of American Anthropological Association, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Burkill, I.H. (1962). A Dictionary of the Economic Products of the Malay Peninsula. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperation, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: xiv + 2444 pp. (in 2 vols).Google Scholar
Caldecott, Julian (1988). Hunting and Wildlife Management in Sarawak. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland/Cambridge: xx + 150 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation (CAPD) (1982). Indonesian Forestry Abstracts: Dutch Literature until about 1960. CAPD, Wageningen, The Netherlands: xvii + 658 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Ching, Lim Sow (1985). Malaysian smallholders: issues and approaches in further processing and manufacturing. Pp. 73–85in ACIAR (q.v.).Google Scholar
Cramb, R.A. (1988). The commercialization of Iban Agriculture. Pp. 105–34 in Cramb & Reece (q.v.).Google Scholar
Cramb, R.A. & Reece, R.H.W. (Eds) (1988). Development in Sarawak: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Monash Paper on Southeast Asia Nr 17, Center of Southeast Asian Studies, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia: 191 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Dove, Michael R. (1985). The agroecological mythology of the Javanese, and the political economy of Indonesia. Indonesia, XXXVI, pp. 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Murray (1974). The political language of the helping professions. Politics and Society, IV(3), pp. 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellen, Roy F. (1979). Sago subsistence and the trade in spices: a provisional model of ecological succession and imbalance in Moluccan history. Pp. 43–74 in Social and Ecological Systems (Eds Burnham, P.C. & Ellen, R.F.). Academic Press, London, England, UK: viii + 314 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Environesia (1990). ITTO meeting promotes unsustainable logging. Vol. IV(2), pp. 12–5, illustr.Google Scholar
Geddes, W.R. (1954). The Land Dayaks of Sarawak. Colonial Research Study Nr 14, HMSO, London, England, UK: 113 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Goodland, Robert (1990). How to save tropical forests — a conspectus. Appendix A in Race to Save the Tropics: Ecology and Economics for a Sustainable Future (Ed. Good-Land, Robert). Island Press, Washington, DC, USA: xvi + 219 pp.Google Scholar
Goodland, Robert J.A., Asibey, Emmanuel O.A. & Post, Jan C. (1990). Tropical moist forest management: the urgency of transition to sustainability. Environmental Conservation, 17(4), pp. 303–18 (5 tables).Google Scholar
Government of Indonesia (GOI) (1991). Statistik Indonesia: Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia. Biro Pusat Statistik (Central Bureau of Statistics), Jakarta, Indonesia: xlix + 587 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Hurst, Philip (1990). Rainforest Politics: Ecological Destruction in Southeast Asia. Zed Books, London, England, UK: xiv + 303 pp.Google Scholar
Jhamtani, Hira (1989). An Overview of Forestry Policies and Commercialization in Indonesia. Paper presented in the Workshop on the US Tropical Timber Trade: Conservation Options and Impacts: 28 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Kerr, K. (1991). The economic potential of handicraft enterprises in rural development: focus on Indonesia. Unasylva, CLXV(42), pp. 31–6, illustr.Google Scholar
Lindblad, J. Thomas (1988). Between Dayak and Dutch: The Economic History of Southeast Kalimantan, 1880–1942. Ver-handelingen Nr 134. Foris Publications, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: x + 282 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Mary, F. & Michon, G. (1987). When agroforests drive back natural forests: a socio-economic analysis of a rice-agroforest system in Sumatra. Agroforestry Systems, V, pp. 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Norman (1986). Economics and ecology in the international arena: the phenomenon of ‘linked linkages’. Ambio, XV(5), pp. 296–300, illustr.Google Scholar
Ohlsson, Bo (1990). Socio-economic Aspects of Forestry Development. (Indonesia Forestry Studies VIII–3.) Ministry of Forestry/Food and Agriculture Organization, Jakarta, Indonesia: ix + 77 pp.Google Scholar
Ormeling, F.J. (1957). The Timor Problem: A Geographical Interpretation of an Underdeveloped Island. (Groningen/Djakarta: J.B. Wolters.) Martinus Nijhoff, 's-Gravenhage, The Netherlands: viii + 284, illustr.Google Scholar
Peluso, Nancy P. (1983 a). Networking in the Commons: a tragedy for rattan? Indonesia, XXXV, pp. 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peluso, Nancy P. (1983 b). Markets and Merchants: The Forest Product Trade of East Kalimantan in Historical Perspective. MSc thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA: ix + 246 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Potter, Lesley (1988). Indigenes and colonisers: Dutch forest policy in South and East Borneo (Kalimantan), [ad] 1900 to 1950. Pp. 127–49 in Changing Tropical Forests: Historical Perspectives on Today's Challenges in Asia, Australasia and Oceania (Eds Dargavel, John, Dixon, Kay & Semple, Noel). Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Canberra, ACT, Australia: ix + 446 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul (1986). Representations are social facts: modernity and post-modernity in anthropology. Pp. 234–61 in Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography (Eds Clifford, J. & Marcus, G.E.). University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA: ix + 305 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saw, L.G., Frankie, J.V., Kochummen, K.M. & Yap, S.K. (1991). Fruit trees in a Malaysian rain forest. Economic Botany, XLV(1), pp. 120–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiva, Vandana (1989). Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development. Zed Books, London, England, UK: xx + 224 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Steinbeck, John (1945/1974). The Pearl. Bantam Books, New York, NY, USA: 118 pp.Google Scholar
Thiesenhausen, William C. (1991). Implications of the rural land tenure system for the environmental debate: three scenarios. The Journal of Developing Areas, XXVI(1), pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Thompson, M., Warburton, M. & Hatley, T. (1986). Uncertainty on a Himalayan Scale: An Institutional Theory of Environmental Perception and a Strategic Framework for the Sustainable Development of the Himalaya. Ethnographica, London, England, UK: ix + 162 pp.Google Scholar
Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt (1984). Politics and Culture in the Meratus Mountains. (PhD dissertation, Stanford University.) Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA: University Microfilms, 2 vols, xi + 635 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Vayda, Andrew P. (1981). Research in East Kalimantan on interactions between people and forests: a preliminary report. Borneo Research Bulletin, XIII(1), pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
Weinstock, J.A. (1983). Rattan: ecological balance in a Borneo rainforest swidden. Economic Botany, XXXVII(1), pp. 58–68.Google Scholar
Westoby, Jack (1983). Who's deforesting whom? Australian Forestry, LXIV(4), pp. 244–50.Google Scholar