Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:46:54.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Applied Ecology: An Integrative Paradigm for the 1980s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Gary W. Barrett
Gary W. Barrett
Affiliation:
Professor of Zoology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, USA; sometime Ecology Program Director, National Science Foundation.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There currently exists an environmental spectrum ranging from ecology (i.e. a basic, theoretical research approach) to environmental science (i.e. an applied, problem-solving testing approach). It is suggested that applied ecology be recognized as an integrative paradigm which encompasses the principles, concepts, and procedures, of both ecology and environmental science in an attempt (a) to unite reductionist and holistic research approaches and educational philosophies, (b) to generate a new synthesis for addressing important ecological topics such as biotic diversity and ecosystem regulation, (c) to educate personnel across the total environmental spectrum, and (d) to develop transdisciplinary ‘centres of excellence’ which serve as vital industrial-academic-governmental focal-points for long-term, integrative research endeavours.

At present there is a dire need to develop unifying theory and coherent principles regarding the patterns, processes, and interactions, of both the natural and man-made environment. There also exists an urgent need to help solve problems related to world food production, energy resource management, genetic diversity, and environmental contamination, among many others. Further, the progress of emerging fields of study, such as landscape ecology and systems communications, will be likely to be impeded if such fields are not recognized as the synthetic interactions of numerous related disciplines. These fields of study hold great research potential for systematically addressing the above-mentioned problem-areas, but require the flexibility to merge new research approaches, technologies, and scientific theories, in an efficient, cost-effective manner. It is suggested that applied ecology serve as an integrative paradigm for these new and vital interdisciplinary fields of knowledge.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , Winter 1984 , pp. 319 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abelson, P.H. (1981). Shortages of scientists and engineers. Science, 211, p. 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, A.D., Barrett, G.W., Barthel, C.E. Jr, Fairburn, D.T. & Wilson, R.E. (1975). A new direction for the training of graduate students in environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 6, pp. 50–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, G.W. (1978). Stress effects on natural ecosystems. Ohio Journal of Science, 78, pp. 160–2.Google Scholar
Barrett, G.W. (1981). Stress ecology: An integrative approach. Pp. 3–12 in Stress Effects on Natural Ecosystems (Ed. Barrett, G.W. & Rosenberg, R.). (Environmental Monographs & Symposia, Convener & Gen. Ed. Polunin, Nicholas.) John Wiley & Sons, Chichester—New York—Brisbane—Toronto—Singapore: xviii + 305 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Barrett, G. W., Johnson, P.L., Pearson, P.G. & Golley, F.B. (1982). Environmental biology employment: Progress and prospect. BioScience, 32, pp. 671–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, G. W., & Puchy, C.A. (1977). Environmental science: A new direction in environmental studies. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 10, pp. 157–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, G.W., Dyne, G.M. Van & Odum, E.P. (1976). Stress ecology. BioScience, 26, pp. 192–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batisse, M. (1980). The relevance of MAB. Environmental Conservation, 7(3), pp. 179–84, map.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batisse, M. (1982). The Biosphere Reserve: A tool for environmental conservation and management. Environmental Conservation, 9(2), pp. 101–11, 8 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J.H. (1981). Two decades of homage to Santa Rosalia: Toward a general theory of diversity. American Zoologist, 21, pp. 877–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, K.L. & McCormick, J.F. (1981). Education and employment of ecologists in the United States. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 62, pp. 193–6.Google Scholar
Catton, W.R., jr (1983). Need for a new paradigm. Sociological Perspectives, 26, pp. 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, F.C. (1956). Ecosystem as the basic unit in ecology. Science, 123, pp. 1127–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forman, R.T.T. (1983). An ecology of the landscape. BioScience, 33, p. 535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, A.L. (1972). Ecosystem analysis: Biome approach to environmental research. Science, 175, pp. 46–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holling, C.S. & Chambers, A.D. (1973). Resource science: The nurture of an infant. BioScience, 23, pp. 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute of Ecology, The—see The Institute of Ecology or TIE.Google Scholar
Jantsch, E. (1972). Technological Planning and Social Futures. Cassell Associated Business Programmes, London, England, UK: xiv + 256 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Johnson, P.L. (Ed.) (1977). An Ecosystem Paradigm for Ecology. Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA: 20 pp.Google Scholar
McCormick, J.F. & Barrett, G.W. (1979). Ecological manpower and employment opportunities. BioScience, 29, pp. 419–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odum, E.P. (1977). The emergence of ecology as a new integrative discipline. Science, 195, pp. 1289–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Platt, J.R. (1964). Strong inference. Science, 146, pp. 347–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polunin, N. (1982). Our global environment and the World Campaign for The Biosphere. Environmental Conservation, 9(2), pp. 115–21, 2 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfield, G.W. & Barrett, G.W. (1983). Applied ecology: Bridging the gap in the ecological sciences. The Environmental Professional, 5, pp. 141–4.Google Scholar
Shull, H. (1978). The Ph.D. ‘glut’. Science, 202, p. 931.Google Scholar
The Institute of Ecology [cited as TIE] (1979). Long-term Ecological Research: Concept Statement and Measurement Needs. Summary of a Workshop (25–27 June 1979), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA: vii + 27 pp.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. (1980). NSF under challenge from Congress, engineers. Science, 209, p. 1499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watt, K.E.F. (1973). Principles of Environmental Science. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, NY, USA: 319 pp.Google Scholar