Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:18:08.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of the marine aquarium trade and management of associated marine pests in Australia, a country with stringent import biosecurity regulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2011

DONALD MORRISEY ,
GRAEME INGLIS ,
KERRY NEIL ,
ANNA BRADLEY  and
ISLA FITRIDGE
DONALD MORRISEY*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd, PO Box 893, Nelson, New Zealand
GRAEME INGLIS
Affiliation:
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd, PO Box 8602, Christchurch, New Zealand
KERRY NEIL
Affiliation:
Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Ltd, PO Box 1762, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
ANNA BRADLEY
Affiliation:
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd, PO Box 893, Nelson, New Zealand
ISLA FITRIDGE
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
*
*Correspondence: Donald Morrisey email: d.morrisey@niwa.co.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Trade in ornamental marine species in Australia, a country with relatively stringent import controls, was investigated using a telephone survey of wholesalers and retailers, and a desktop review of internet import databases and hobbyist trading websites. Information on the regulatory framework was obtained from government and other published or online sources, and from staff of regulatory agencies. Although the trade is small relative to that in the USA, Europe and parts of Asia, Australia imports significant numbers of marine fish each year for the aquarium trade. Many of the more than 200 species imported have the potential to become environmental and/or economic pests. Imported individuals of native species could act as vectors of disease or affect the genetic diversity of native populations if they were released into the wild. Regulatory measures include the use of lists of permitted species of plants and animals, a case-by-case risk assessment process for species not on these lists, and requirements for health certification and quarantining of imported stock. Once within Australia, however, translocation is less rigorously controlled, being managed by individual states and based largely on lists of prohibited species, though generally with scope for case-by-case assessment and refusal of permits for unwanted species, such as recognized pests. Wholesalers and retailers interviewed generally showed a responsible attitude to the disposal of dead or unwanted stock, but awareness and understanding of the potential pest risk of ornamental marine species was generally poor. The importance of raising public awareness of the pest potential of ornamental marine species is likely to increase with the growing importance of mail-order and internet trade.

Keywords

Australiabiosecurityintroduced speciesmarine aquarium traderegulation
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 89 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Biosecurity Australia (2008) The weed risk assessment process [www document]. URL http://www.daffa.gov.au/ba/reviews/weeds/systemGoogle Scholar
Chan, T.T.C. & Sadovy, Y. (1998) Profile of the marine aquarium fish trade in Hong Kong. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 2: 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, A.L., Grossman, J.D., Spezio, T.S., Weiskel, H.W., Blum, J.C., Burt, J.W., Muir, A.A., Piovia-Scott, J., Veblen, K.E. & Grosholz, E.D. (2009) Tackling aquatic invasions: risks and opportunities for the aquarium fish industry. Biological Invasions 11: 773–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J., Mirotchnick, N & Leung, B. (2007) Thousands introduced annually: the aquarium pathway for non-indigenous plants to the St Lawrence Seaway. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5: 528–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DAFF (2005) A strategic approach to the management of ornamental fish in Australia: consultation draft. Marine Coastal Committee and Natural Resources Standing Committee, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Canberra, Australia: 38 pp.Google Scholar
Davis, A., Roberts, D. & Cummins, S. (1997) Rapid invasion of a sponge-dominated deep-reef by Caulerpa scalpelliformis (Chlorophyta) in Botany Bay. Australian Journal of Ecology 22: 146–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DEH (2005 a) Assessment of the Northern Territory Aquarium Fishery. Commonwealth Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra, Australia: 28 pp.Google Scholar
DEH (2005 b) Assessment of the Queensland Marine Aquarium Fish Fishery. Commonwealth Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra, Australia: 24 pp.Google Scholar
DEH (2005 c) Assessment of the Tasmanian Marine Aquarium Fishery. Commonwealth Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra, Australia: 30 pp.Google Scholar
DEH (2005 d) Assessment of the Western Australian Marine Aquarium Fish Fishery. Commonwealth Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra, Australia: 25 pp.Google Scholar
DEH (2005 e) Assessment of the Cocos (Keeling) Islands Marine Aquarium Fish Fishery. Commonwealth Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra, Australia: 20 pp.Google Scholar
DEH (2006) Assessment of the Queensland Coral Fishery. Commonwealth Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra, Australia: 22 pp.Google Scholar
Derraik, J.G.B. & Phillips, S. (2010) Online trade poses a threat to biosecurity in New Zealand. Biological Invasions 12: 1477–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duggan, I.C., Rixon, C.A.M. & MacIsaac, H.J. (2006) Popularity and propagule pressure: determinants of introduction and establishment of aquarium fish. Biological Invasions 8: 377–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, A.J., Lodge, D.M. & Hsia, J.F. (2007) Failure of the Lacey Act to protect US ecosystems against animal invasions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5: 353–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froese, R, & Pauly, D., eds (2002) FishBase [www document]. URL http://www.fishbase.orgGoogle Scholar
Glasby, T.M. & Gibson, P.T. (2007) Limited evidence for increased cold-tolerance of invasive versus native Caulerpa taxifolia. Marine Biology 152: 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harriott, V.J. (2001) The sustainability of Queensland's Coral Harvest Fishery. CRC Reef Research Centre Technical Report No. 40. CRC Reef research Centre, Townsville, Australia: 33 pp.Google Scholar
Jensen, D.A., Lichtkoppler, F., Starinchak, J. & Meyers, M. (2006) Habattitude™ baseline survey shows that aquarists and water gardeners can be the problem and solution to AIS spread. Fourteenth International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species. Key Biscayne, Florida, USA, p. 118 [www document]. URL http://www.icais.org/pdf/Abstracts_2006.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kay, S.H. & Hoyle, S.T. (2001) Mail order, the Internet, and invasive aquatic weeds. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 39: 88–91.Google Scholar
Larkin, S.L. & Degner, R.L. (2001) The US wholesale market for marine ornamentals. Aquarium Science and Conservation 3: 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lintermans, M. (2004) Human-assisted dispersal of alien freshwater fish in Australia. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 38: 481–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, G. & Langenkamp, D. (2003) Australian aquaculture. Industry profiles for selected species. Australian Bureau of Agriculture and Resource Economics eReport O38, prepared for the Fisheries Resources Research Fund, Canberra, Australia, May 2003 [www document]. URL http://www.abareconomics.com/publications_html/fisheries/fisheries_03/er03_aquaculture.pdfGoogle Scholar
McDowall, R.M. (2004) Shoot first, and then ask questions: a look at aquarium fish imports and invasiveness in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 38: 503–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNee, A. (2002) A national approach to the management of exotic fish species in the aquarium trade: an inventory of exotic freshwater species. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra, Australia: 40 pp.Google Scholar
Ministerial Council on Forestry, Fisheries and Aquaculture (1999) National policy for the translocation of live aquatic organisms: issues, principles and guidelines for implementation. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra, Australia: 31 pp.Google Scholar
Murphy, N.E. & Schaffelke, B. (2003) Use of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) as a new tool to explore the invasive green alga Caulerpa taxifolia in Australia. Marine Ecology Progress Series 246: 307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, S. & Cliff, M. (2005) Marine aquarium fish managed fishery status report. In: Western Australian Department of Fisheries, State of the Fisheries Report 2005–2006, pp. 253–255. Western Australian Department of Fisheries, Perth Western Australia.Google Scholar
Padilla, D.K. & Williams, S.L. (2004) Beyond ballast water: aquarium and ornamental trades as sources of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2: 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pejchar, L. & Mooney, H.A. (2009) Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24: 497–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruiz, G.M., Carlton, J.T., Grosholz, E.D. & Hines, A.H. (1997) Global invasions of marine and estuarine habitats by non-indigenous species: mechanisms, extent, and consequences. American Zoologist 37: 621–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, S. & Clarke, K. (2005) Ecological assessment of the Queensland marine aquarium fish fishery. A report to the Australian Government Department of Environment and Heritage. Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Brisbane, Australia: 78 pp.Google Scholar
Schaffelke, B., Smith, J.E. & Hewitt, C.L. (2006) Introduced macroalgae: a growing problem. Journal of Applied Phycology 18: 529–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semmens, B.X., Buhle, E.R., Salomon, A.K. & Pattengill-Semmens, C.V. (2004) A hotspot of non-native marine fishes: evidence for the aquarium trade as an invasion pathway. Marine Ecology Progress Series 266: 239–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. (2005) The politics of assessing risk for biological invasions: the USA as a case study. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20: 216–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simberloff, D. (2006) Risk assessments, blacklists, and white lists for introduced species: are predictions good enough to be useful? Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 35: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K.F., Behrens, M.D., Max, L.M. & Daszak, P. (2008) U.S. drowning in unidentified fishes: scope, implications, and regulation of live fish import. Conservation Letters 1: 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wabnitz, C., Taylor, M., Green, E. & Razak, T. (2003) From ocean to aquarium: the global trade in marine ornamental species. UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK: 64 pp.Google Scholar
Walters, L.J., Brown, K.R., Stam, W.T. & Olsen, J.L. (2006) E-commerce and Caulerpa: unregulated dispersal of invasive species. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4: 75–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weigle, S.M., Smith, L.D., Carlton, J.T. & Pederson, J. (2005) Assessing the risk of introducing exotic species via the live marine species trade. Conservation Biology 19: 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitfield, P.E., Gardner, T., Vives, S.P., Gilligan, M.R., Courtenay, W.R. Jr, Ray, G.C. & Hare, J.A. (2002) Biological invasion of the Indo-Pacific lionfish Pterois volitans along the Atlantic coast of North America. Marine Ecology Progress Series 235: 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R.J. & Chong, R. (2007) Global trade in ornamental fish from as Australian perspective: the case for revised import risk analysis and management strategies. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 81: 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, E. (2001) Collection of coral reef species for aquaria: global trade, conservation issues and management strategies. Marine Conservation Society, Ross-on-Wye, UK: 80 pp.Google Scholar
Zaleski, S.F. & Murray, S.N. (2006) Taxonomic diversity and geographic distributions of aquarium-traded species of Caulerpa (Chlorophyta: Caulerpaceae) in southern California, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 214: 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Morrisey Supplementary Material

Morrisey Supplementary Material

Download Morrisey Supplementary Material(File)
File 85 KB