Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:38:43.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commercial harvesting and regeneration of epiphytic macrolichen communities in the Western Ghats, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2011

LUCAS MOLLEMAN ,
SIL BOEVE ,
JAN WOLF ,
GERARD OOSTERMEIJER ,
SOUBADRA DEVY  and
RENGAIAN GANESAN
LUCAS MOLLEMAN
Affiliation:
Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94248, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
SIL BOEVE
Affiliation:
Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94248, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
JAN WOLF*
Affiliation:
Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94248, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
GERARD OOSTERMEIJER
Affiliation:
Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94248, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
SOUBADRA DEVY
Affiliation:
Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, 659 5th A Main, Hebbal, Bangalore 560 024, India
RENGAIAN GANESAN
Affiliation:
Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, 659 5th A Main, Hebbal, Bangalore 560 024, India
*
*Correspondence: Dr Jan Wolf Tel: + 31 20 525 8423 Fax: + 31 20 525 7832 e-mail: j.h.d.wolf@uva.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Non-timber forest products form a substantial contribution to the livelihood of many rural communities worldwide. In the Western Ghats, India, epiphytic macrolichens are harvested by Paliyan tribes to generate supplementary income. Paliyan tribes employ two harvesting methods: shallow harvesting, with a minimum of attached bark substratum, and deep harvesting, which exposes the sapwood. To evaluate the regeneration of the lichen community in terms of species diversity, abundance and composition, 320 bark samples of up to 50 cm2 were collected from bark patches where lichens had been harvested previously, as shown by bark scars. Samples selected represented four host tree species, both harvesting methods and seven one-year intervals of time since harvesting. In each case, the field guide estimated sample age, and peer-testing proved these estimates to be reliable up to an age of seven years. Seven years after harvesting, the lichen community showed noteworthy regeneration capacity in terms of total lichen coverage and species richness. However, to assess the risk of local species loss in the long-term, any harvesting should include continuous monitoring of lichen species composition. Since shallow harvesting resulted in a swifter recovery of species abundance and richness compared with deep harvesting, harvesters should preferentially employ the shallow harvesting method.

Keywords

extractive reserveslichensnon-timber forest productsPalni HillsPaliyan tribessustainable yield
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 334 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, W.M., Aveling, R., Brockington, D., Dickson, B., Elliott, J., Hutton, J., Roe, D., Vira, B. & Wolmer, W. (2004) Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science 306 (5699): 1146–1149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anon. (2010) Minimum wages in Tamil Nadu [www document]. URL http://www.paycheck.in/main/officialminimumwages/tamil-nadu.Google Scholar
Armstrong, R.A. (2003) Lobe connections and lobe crowding are associated with growth rate in the lichen Xanthoparmelia conspersa. Symbiosis 34: 133–143.Google Scholar
Awasthi, D.D. (2000) A Hand Book of Lichens. Lucknow, India: Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh.Google Scholar
Barkman, J.J. (1958) Phytosociology and Ecology of Cryptogamic Epiphytes. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum & Comp. NV.Google Scholar
Belcher, B., Ruíz Pérez, M. & Achdiawan, R. (2005) Global patterns and trends in the use and management of commercial NTFPs: implications for livelihoods and conservation. World Development 33: 1435–1452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgener, M. & Walter, S. (2007) Trade Measures – Tools to Promote the Sustainable Use of NWFP? Rome, Italy: FAO.Google Scholar
Edwards, D.M. (1996) The trade in non-timber forest products from Nepal. Mountain Research and Development 16: 383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, G.W., Canham, C.D. & Lertzman, K.P. (1999) Gap Light Analyzer (GLA) 2.0: Imaging software to extract canopy structure and gap light transmission indices from true-colour fisheye photographs. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
Green, T.G.A. & Lange, O.L. (1994) Photosynthesis in poikilohydric organisms: a comparison of lichens and bryophytes. In: Ecophysiology of Photosynthesis, ed. Schulze, E.D. & Caldwell, M.M., pp. 319–341. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany and New York, NY, USA: Springer.Google Scholar
Kumar, K. & Upreti, D.K. (2001) Parmelia spp. (lichen) in ancient medicinal plant lore of India. Economic Botany 55: 458–459.Google Scholar
Lawrey, J.D. (1995) Lichen allelopathy: a review. Allelopathy ACS Symposium Series 582: 26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löbel, S., Snäll, T. & Rydin, H. (2006) Species richness patterns and metapopulation processes: evidence from epiphyte communities in boreo-nemoral forests. Ecography 29: 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maraseni, T.N., Shivakoti, G.P., Cockfield, G. & Apan, A. (2006) Nepalese non-timber forest products: an analysis of the equitability of profit distribution across a supply chain to India. Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy 5 (2): 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, E., Schreckenberg, K. & Newton, A.C. (2006) Commercialization of Non-Timber Forest Products: Factors Influencing Success. Cambridge, UK: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre.Google Scholar
McCune, B. (1990) Rapid estimation of abundance of epiphytes on branches. The Bryologist 93 (1): 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moxham, T. H. (1981) Lichens in the perfume industry. Dragoco Report 2: 31–39.Google Scholar
Peres, C.A., Baider, C., Zuidema, P.A., Wadt, L.H.O., Kainer, K.A., Gomes-Silva, D.A.P., Salomão, R.P., Simões, L.L., Franciosi, E.R.N., Cornejo Valverde, F., Gribel, R., Shepard, G.H., Kanashiro, M., Coventry, P., Yu, D.W., Watkinson, A.R., & Freckleton, R.P. (2003) Demographic threats to the sustainability of Brazil nut exploitation. Science 302: 2112–2114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, C.M. (1996) The Ecology and Management of Non-timber Forest Resources. Washington, DC, USA: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putz, F.E., Blate, G.M., Redford, K.H., Fimbel, R. & Robinson, J. (2001) Biodiversity conservation in the context of tropical forest management. Conservation Biology 15: 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renhorn, K.E., Esseen, P.A., Palmqvist, B. & Sundberg, B. (1997) Growth and vitality of epiphytic lichens I, responses to microclimate along a forest edge-interior gradient. Oecologia 109: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ros-Tonen, M.A.F. (2000) The role of non-timber forest products in sustainable tropical forest management. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff 58: 196–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selva, S.B. (1994) Lichen diversity and stand continuity in the northern hardwoods and spruce–fir forests of northern New England and western New Brunswick. The Bryologist 97: 424–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackleton, C. & Shackleton, S. (2004) The importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: a review of evidence from South Africa. South African Journal of Science 100: 658–664.Google Scholar
Shah, N.C. (1997) Lichens of economic importance from the hills of Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Herbs, Spices and Medicinal Plants 5: 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillett, S.C., McCune, B., Peck, J.E., Rambo, T.R. & Ruchty, A. (2000) Dispersal limitations of epiphytic lichens result in species dependent on old-growth forests. Ecological Applications 10 (3): 789–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ter Braak, C.J.F. (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67 (5): 1167–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ter Braak, C.J.F. (1988) CANOCO-an extension of DECORANA to analyze species-environment relationships. Vegetatio 75: 159–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ticktin, T. (2004) The ecological implications of harvesting non-timber forest products. Journal of Applied Ecology 41 (1): 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upreti, D.K. (1995) Loss of biodiversity in India lichen flora. Environmental Conservation 22: 362–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upreti, D.K., Divakar, P.K. & Nayaka, S. (2005) Commercial and ethnic use of lichens in India. Economic Botany 59: 269–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, J.H.D. (1994) Factors controlling the distribution of vascular and nonvascular epiphytes in the northern Andes. Vegetatio 112 (1): 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, J.H.D. & Konings, C.J.F. (2001) Toward the sustainable harvesting of epiphytic bromeliads: a pilot study from the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Biological Conservation 101: 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar