Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:23:44.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Community attitudes toward three protected areas in Upper Myanmar (Burma)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2006

TERI ALLENDORF
Affiliation:
110 Elm Street, Mazomanie, WI 53560, USA
KHAING KHAING SWE
Affiliation:
Chatthin Wildlife Sanctuary, Kanbalu Township, Sagaing Division, Myanmar
THIDA OO
Affiliation:
State High School, Chatthin Village, Kanbalu, Shwebo, Sagaing Division, Myanmar
YE HTUT
Affiliation:
Alaungdaw Kathapa National Park, Yinmabin, Sagaing Division, Myanmar
MYINT AUNG
Affiliation:
Htamanthi Wildlife Sanctuary, Htamanthi, Sagaing Division, Myanmar
MYINT AUNG
Affiliation:
Chatthin Wildlife Sanctuary, Kanbalu Township, Sagaing Division, Myanmar
KEERA ALLENDORF
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1180 Observatory Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA
LEE-ANN HAYEK
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC 20560-0136, USA
PETER LEIMGRUBER
Affiliation:
National Zoological Park, Conservation and Research Center, Front Royal, VA 22630, USA
CHRIS WEMMER
Affiliation:
California Academy of Sciences, 875 Howard Street, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA

Abstract

An effective protected area system is essential for the long-term conservation of Myanmar's biodiversity. This study examined the attitudes of 2915 residents in 97 communities around three protected areas (PAs) in upper Myanmar: Alaungdaw Kathapa National Park in the western mountains, Htamanthi Wildlife Sanctuary in the hills bordering the Chindwin and Uru rivers, and Chatthin Wildlife Sanctuary in the central dry zone. Logistic regression indicated a positive attitude toward the PAs was most highly correlated with a perception of conservation benefits and benefits resulting from management of the areas. Attitude was also significantly correlated with a perception of extraction benefits, conflicts with PA staff and crop damage by wildlife. Socioeconomic variables were less powerful than perceptions in predicting attitude and, unlike perceptions, their effects varied among the areas. The much greater effect of perceptions, especially positive ones, on people's attitudes indicates that understanding perceptions is important to improving the relationship between local residents and these PAs. This finding underscores the fact that a focus on conflicts to understand people's attitudes toward PAs may undervalue or miss critical positive perceptions that people hold. Understanding local residents' perceptions of PAs makes possible the creation of strategic, place-based management strategies that build on people's positive perceptions and mitigate their negative perceptions.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2006 Foundation for Environmental Conservation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)