Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:47:54.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Community-based monitoring reveals low anthropogenic pressure on a game vertebrate population in a sustainable-use Amazonian protected area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2024

Yasmin Maria Sampaio dos Reis*
Affiliation:
Applied Ecology & Conservation Lab, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil
Maíra Benchimol
Affiliation:
Applied Ecology & Conservation Lab, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil
*
Corresponding author: Yasmin Maria Sampaio dos Reis; Email: yasmin.sampaioreis@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Biodiversity systematic monitoring programmes have been expanding across the globe, especially in protected areas (PAs). Amongst sustainable-use PAs, medium- to large-sized mammals and birds comprise crucial groups to monitor, given their importance to forest functionality and subsistence for local residents. Here, we used 6 years of community-based monitoring data from a sustainable-use PA in the Brazilian Amazonia (Tapajós–Arapiuns Extractive Reserve) to examine the influence of anthropogenic stressors and time on the density and biomass of forest mammal and bird game species. We further assessed trends in population density of target groups over the period. A total of 1915 km of line-transect surveys were completed by trained local monitors along eight established transects, providing data from 12 medium-sized and five large-sized game genera. Generalized linear mixed models of all medium-sized species, all large species and four individual taxa (Tinamidae, Dasyproctidae, primates and Cervidae) showed that some species (e.g., Dasyprocta croconota) exhibited great density, whereas others (e.g., Tapirus terrestris and Tayassu pecari) were rarely detected. Anthropogenic variables did not affect the density and biomass of the overall medium-sized and large vertebrates. Dasyproctidae, Tinamidae and primates were the only taxa influenced by anthropogenic stressors, with negative influence occurring only for Tinamidae. Moreover, density of groups and taxa remained stable throughout the period in the Reserve, although the frequency of some species may indicate past population losses. Continuation of this monitoring programme is required to improve understanding of population fluctuations, but over the 6 years studied, game population density and biomass were not linked to anthropogenic stressors.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Foundation for Environmental Conservation

Introduction

The implementation of systematic biodiversity monitoring programmes has been expanding across the globe, especially in protected areas (Schmeller et al. Reference Schmeller, Böhm, Arvanitidis, Barber-Meyer, Brummitt and Chandler2017, Reis & Benchimol Reference Reis and Benchimol2023). As these programmes provide information on the status and trends of natural resources, including wildlife populations, they can greatly contribute to curbing the worldwide biodiversity crisis (Danielsen et al. Reference Danielsen, Eicken, Funder, Johnson, Lee and Theilade2022). In addition, these programmes can evaluate the impacts of a myriad of anthropogenic activities on biodiversity, including habitat destruction, climate change and wildlife overexploitation (da Veiga & Ehlers Reference da Veiga and Ehlers2009). In Brazil, for instance, the federal government established a long-term and large-scale biodiversity monitoring programme across different protected areas, focused on assessing the conservation status of fauna and flora species in addition to evaluating their responses to anthropogenic pressures (Ribeiro Reference Ribeiro2018, Cronemberger et al. Reference Cronemberger, Ribeiro, Acosta, de Andrade, Marini-Filho, Masuda and Mendes2023). Implementing such initiatives is especially needed within sustainable-use protected areas, which retain high biodiversity and are home to Indigenous and other traditional human communities that rely on forest resources to survive (Lima & Pozzobon Reference Lima and Pozzobon2005).

Community-based monitoring programmes have been widely established to monitor game fauna in sustainable-use protected areas across tropical countries (Reis & Benchimol Reference Reis and Benchimol2023). Besides providing spatiotemporal information on monitored game species and informing appropriate management actions (Danielsen et al. Reference Danielsen, Enghoff, Poulsen, Funder, Jensen and Burgess2021), participatory programmes value the experiences and points of view of local people who have extensive knowledge of wildlife species. In particular, large and medium-sized forest species, including mammals and birds, are amongst the main target game fauna and represent most of the vertebrate biomass in tropical forests (Benítez-López et al. Reference Benítez-López, Santini, Schipper, Busana and Huijbregts2019). Species weighing more than 5 kg (hereafter, ‘large-sized species’) comprise the favourite targets of hunters (Constantino et al. Reference Constantino, Fortini, Kaxinawa, Kaxinawa, Kaxinawa and Kaxinawa2008) due to their meat flavour and the greater return per unit of effort. In addition, large-sized vertebrate species are more vulnerable as they usually exhibit lower reproductive rates and are affected by external factors such as anthropogenic activities (Cardillo et al. Reference Cardillo, Mace, Jones, Bielby, Bininda-Emonds and Sechrest2005). Therefore, the density of large species usually decreases in areas under pervasive anthropogenic pressure (potentially linked to hunting pressure), and this alters the structure of vertebrate communities and reduces vertebrate biomass (Peres Reference Peres2000, Jerozolimski & Peres Reference Jerozolimski and Peres2003). In addition, the reduction in vertebrate biomass often exceeds the changes in overall species abundance and species losses driven by anthropogenic activities, given that small species may be favoured and tend to proliferate in areas where large species were extirpated (Peres & Palacios Reference Peres and Palacios2007), a phenomenon termed ‘density compensation’ (MacArthur et al. Reference MacArthur, Diamond and Karr1972).

Several anthropogenic factors are highly associated with hunting pressure for forest game vertebrates, including hunter access points (e.g., communities and roads) and human population density (Beirne et al. Reference Beirne, Meier, Mbele, Menie, Froese, Okouyi and Poulsen2019). For instance, Scabin and Peres (Reference Scabin and Peres2021) showed that distance from villages and human population size represent good proxies of anthropogenic threats to large game vertebrates in a sustainable-use Amazonia protected area, as steep biomass declines were recorded near urban sites, indicating the greatest human pressure occurring there. Assessing the influence of anthropogenic variables on patterns of vertebrate density and overall biomass is important in sustainable-use protected areas given the potential for vertebrate populations to become depleted.

Declines in populations of large forest vertebrates driven by overhunting occur widely in tropical countries, particularly in Africa and Asia (Benítez-López et al. Reference Benítez-López, Santini, Schipper, Busana and Huijbregts2019). Thus, the diversity and relative abundance of large mammal species, such as primates and ungulates, decreased significantly near villages in Gabon due to high levels of hunting pressure (Koerner et al. Reference Koerner, Poulsen, Blanchard, Okouyi and Clark2017, Beirne et al. Reference Beirne, Meier, Mbele, Menie, Froese, Okouyi and Poulsen2019). In Amazonian forests, heavily hunted forest sites have also experienced reductions in abundances of large mammals (Peres Reference Peres2000). Nevertheless, terrestrial vertebrate populations have proved to be somewhat resilient to hunting in some Amazonian forest sites (e.g., Iwamura et al. Reference Iwamura, Lambin, Silvius, Luzar and Fragoso2014, Antunes et al. Reference Antunes, Fewster, Venticinque, Peres, Levi, Rohe and Shepard2016), even though humans have been intensively hunting medium- and large-sized species there for many years. This is probably because many vast upland areas remain inaccessible to hunters, establishing a source–sink dynamic that can rescue over-harvested populations in heavily hunted areas (Antunes et al. Reference Antunes, Fewster, Venticinque, Peres, Levi, Rohe and Shepard2016). Conversely, some Amazonian forest sites have experienced past population declines due to anthropogenic pressure, and currently they are recognized to be exhibiting a state of semi-defaunation (Peres et al. Reference Peres, Barlow and Haugaasen2003). However, to better understand this dynamic, it is necessary to monitor game fauna over time and to generate spatiotemporal information on the monitored species.

Here, we used a comprehensive database from a 6-year community-based monitoring study in a sustainable-use protected area in the Brazilian Amazonia to evaluate: (1) how anthropogenic stressors and year modulate patterns of density and biomass of mammal and bird forest game species; and (2) how game populations fluctuate over the years (i.e., if the density of target groups and taxa are stable, increasing or decreasing over the evaluated time series). We extracted two variables related to hunting pressure (i.e., a proxy of human intensity (HI) and the distance to the nearest road) and estimated the overall density and biomass of large (≥5 kg) and medium-sized (0.54–5.00 kg for birds, 0.92–5.00 kg for mammals) game species pooled together, in addition to densities of the four taxa most frequently recorded within eight established linear transects per year across the Tapajós–Arapiuns Extractive Reserve (hereafter, ‘RESEX-TA’). We hypothesize that the interaction between our two anthropogenic stressors would best explain the overall patterns of density and biomass of large game taxa given the greater access of hunters and their greater preference for large species (Peres Reference Peres2000). We expected to observe an increase in the overall densities and biomass of medium-sized game taxa in areas under greater human influence, caused by density compensation (MacArthur et al. Reference MacArthur, Diamond and Karr1972). We expected that Dasyproctidae and Tinamidae densities (medium-sized terrestrial taxa) would be positively influenced by anthropogenic stressors as a result of the compensatory effect, whereas for Cervidae (large-sized taxa) we expected to observe a negative influence. Similarly, because medium-sized primates such as capuchins are likely to be positively affected by human stressors due to the reductions of the large-bodied primates (i.e., Atelidae), we expected that population densities of Tinamidae, Psophiidae, Cracidae, Dasyproctidae, Procyonidae and Primates would increase over time, whereas intensive hunting would lead to decreases in Cervidae, Tayassuidae and Atelidae.

Materials and methods

Study area

This study was conducted in the RESEX-TA, a terrestrial extractive sustainable-use protected area in western Pará (Brazilian Amazonia; 02º20′–03º40′ S, 55º00′–56º00′ W; Fig. 1) created in 1998 to protect local people from the impacts of the expansion of logging companies (Oliveira et al. Reference Oliveira, Junior and Chaves2005). Covering a total area of nearly 650 000 ha, the RESEX-TA is currently the most human-populated extractive reserve in Brazil, housing c. 23 000 residents (Silva et al. Reference Silva, Nascimento, Magalhães and Spínola2022). It comprises the first Brazilian protected area of this category to develop a management plan, a technical document that establishes the zoning and norms that guide the use of the protected area.

Figure 1. Location of the Tapajós–Arapiuns Extractive Reserve (RESEX) in the cities of Santarém and Aveiro (Pará), Brazil.

The predominant vegetation is the ombrophilous forest (66.19% of the territory), characterized by large trees, with abundant woody, epiphytic and liana plants (Veloso et al. Reference Veloso, Rangel-Filho and Lima1991, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística 1992) in terra firme (unflooded) forests. Other common plant typologies encompass secondary forest (8.88%), savannah (0.62%) and flooded forest (Carvalho-Junior Reference Carvalho Junior2008, Montag et al. Reference Montag, Prudente, Ferreira, Dutra, Benone, Barbosa and Ruffeil2012). The climate is humid tropical (Ami), with a rainy season from November to May and a dry season from August to October (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais & Centro de Previsão de Tempo e Estudos Climáticos 2023).

The RESEX-TA has 78 communities inhabiting areas along the Tapajós and Arapiuns rivers (Silva et al. Reference Silva, Nascimento, Magalhães and Spínola2022), in addition to a few families living along small streams (Oliveira et al. Reference Oliveira, Junior and Chaves2005), Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade 2014; Fig. 1). All communities are established in terra firme forests, in which the residents directly depend on the exploitation of natural resources (hunting, fishing and extraction of timber and non-timber forest products) and/or family farming and small-animal breeding (Saúde & Alegria 2012). Hunting is allowed for subsistence purposes, and its management depends on internal agreements signed between communities and reserve managers. In mid-2021, there was an attempt at logging through a community forest management plan, but the lack of prior popular consultation resulted in the cessation of activities.

Participatory Biodiversity Monitoring Project

In 2014, the Brazilian federal government’s Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio) implemented the Brazilian Biodiversity Monitoring Program (Monitora Program) in the RESEX-TA. Given that local residents expressed their willingness to understand the current and future population status of terrestrial game fauna (i.e., medium- to large-sized mammals and birds), the monitoring programme in the RESEX-TA focused on species belonging to these groups, as well as reptiles (total of 25 target species, carefully chosen by local people based on their hunting activities; Table S1). This programme was carried out via the Participatory Biodiversity Monitoring Project (PMPB), a partnership between ICMBio and the Instituto de Pesquisas Ecológicas (IPÊ; Ribeiro Reference Ribeiro2018).

Firstly, various meetings were conducted in the RESEX-TA to identify potential monitors belonging to these communities who would become responsible for transect establishment and data collection. In particular, transects needed to be placed in areas accessible on foot or by boat/canoe to the monitors, in areas lacking direct human impacts apart from hunting activities. Furthermore, transects were placed at various distances from the nearest community, with transects nearby being more likely to be affected by hunting pressure (Sampaio et al. Reference Sampaio, Morato, Royle, Abrahams, Peres and Chiarello2023). Prior to effective implementation, potential areas were identified through maps, taking into account elevation profiles, obtaining coordinates from maps and on-site recognition of the areas. Finally, transects needed to be at least 5 km from each other and placed in non-flooded forests, which represent the main land cover type in the RESEX-TA; a total of nine linear transects of 5 km in length were thus established. However, after beginning data collection in 2014, one community left the programme, leaving only eight communities/transects in the programme (Fig. 1). Each target community selected three to four monitors older than 18 years of age based on their willingness to participate combined with vast experience in walking along the forest. Subsequent training courses were provided by ICMBio and partners to all monitors, focused on providing instructions for game fauna surveys. Since 2022, data collection has been performed by 31 previously trained monitors.

Data collection

On each transect, pairs of monitors conducted linear transect surveys of the transects in their neighbourhood. The methodology widely used in tropical forests (Peres Reference Peres1999, Benchimol Reference Benchimol and TH2016) consisted of walks at a slow and constant speed (average 1 km/h) along a linear transect, searching for both visual and acoustic records of the target species. Surveys were conducted only in the morning (06.30–11.30) by a pair of monitors and did not occur on rainy days. Whenever an individual or group of target species was observed, the following information was recorded: species name, type of record, time of encounter, location of the animal on the transect, number of individuals and perpendicular distance to the first detected individual, subgroup or group (measured with a tape measure). Given that local monitors had extensive experience of walking in the forest and of searching for and identifying animals, and given that appropriate training courses were also provided, the data collected were consistent and robust. Surveys were conducted between 2015 and 2020, with an average of nine (SD = 2.59) survey days per transect per year, totalling 384 sampling days across the eight transects. Although initially the protocol aimed to obtain data from the dry and wet periods for 10 days per year per transect, data were collected in different months depending on the availability of the monitors, resulting in the sampling effort varying amongst transects. Furthermore, there were situations in which the linear transects extended throughout the day or rainy periods that only enabled partial sampling; such data were excluded from the analysis. The cumulative distance sampled in each transect varied from 5 to 65 km per year, with the total distance being 1915 km over the 6 years (mean ± SD = 239 ± 45 km per transect; Table S2).

Target taxa

We used data collected from nine game forest taxa (i.e., nine taxonomic orders or families of hunted medium- and large-sized forest mammals and birds) in the RESEX-TA (Reis et al. Reference Reis, Valsecchi and Queiroz2018, Reference Reis, Soares, Maduro, Spinola and da Rocha2022; Table S1). The selected focal taxa were: those of the Monitora Program monitoring protocol, which considered the target hunting species in the region based on local people’s knowledge; and those recorded in hunting events (not covered in this study) from the Monitora Program (Reis et al. Reference Reis, Valsecchi and Queiroz2018, Reference Reis, Soares, Maduro, Spinola and da Rocha2022). Specifically, for our study, we selected game species from those two categories that could be recorded within the RESEX-TA through the use of the linear transect technique (Table S1). A species-level analysis was not feasible due to the limited number of records for most animals. There were six taxa of medium-sized animals (0.54–5.00 kg for birds, 0.92–5.00 kg for mammals): Tinamidae (Tinamus spp., Crypturellus spp.), Psophiidae (Psophia viridis), Cracidae (Penelope spp., Crax sp. and Pauxi tuberosa), Dasyproctidae (Dasyprocta croconota), primates (Cebus unicolor, Sapajus apella, Pithecia irrorata, Callicebus hoffmannsi) and Procyonidae (Nasua nasua); and three taxa of large animals (>5 kg): Atelidae (Alouatta nigerrima), Cervidae (Mazama americana and Mazama nemorivaga) and Tayassuidae (Dicotyles tajacu and Tayassu pecari). Despite some species not frequently being hunted at other Amazonian sites (e.g., P. irrorata, C. hoffmannsi and S. apella), they were being captured for consumption in the RESEX-TA (YMS Reis, unpublished data 2023). In addition, we did not include Ateles marginatus as a focal species as it has been extirpated from the RESEX-TA by previous severe hunting (Peres et al. Reference Peres, Barlow and Haugaasen2003).

Density and biomass

We estimated the density of each of the nine animal taxa in each transect and year using Equation 1:

(1) $$D = {N \over {2\ \times\ EW\ \times\ L}}$$

where D represents the density (individuals/km2), N represents the total number of sightings, EW represents the effective width of the transect (in km) and L represents the total distance travelled (Bernardo & Galetti Reference Bernardo and Galetti2004). To obtain EW, we grouped the visualization events per taxa and constructed six competing models using the Distance 4.1 software: a uniform key function with either cosine or simple polynomial series expansion; a half-normal key function with either cosine or hermite polynomial series expansion; and a hazard rate key function with cosine or simple polynomial series expansion (Thomas et al. Reference Thomas, Buckland, Rexstad, Laake, Strindberg and Hedley2010; models in Table S3). We selected the best-fit model based on the lowest Akaike information criterion (AIC) values (Burnham & Anderson Reference Burnham, Anderson, Burnham and Anderson2002) and coefficient of variation and the highest goodness-of-fit χ2 test probability values. From the estimated density per taxa, we evaluated the effect of hunting on animal densities considering (1) group (medium- and large-sized) density and biomass and (2) ‘individual’ densities of the four most frequent taxa (Tinamidae, Dasyproctidae, Primates and Cervidae) for each transect in each year. Given the low number of records, we were unable to conduct individual analyses for the other taxa. Biomass was calculated as the sum of densities of each species multiplied by the mean body mass of the species in each group (based on Robinson & Redford Reference Robinson and Redford1986, Ayres & Ayres Reference Ayres and Ayres1979, Valsechi Reference Valsechi2013).

Anthropogenic stressors

We obtained two metrics related to anthropogenic pressure. Firstly, we used a proxy of HI based on the distance to nearest community and human population size of its community (adapted from Scabin & Peres Reference Scabin and Peres2021), according to Equation 2:

(2) $$HI = \sum {{S\left( {com} \right)} \over {\sqrt {d\left( {com} \right)} }}$$

where S represents the human population size in each community (com; Table S4) and d represents the Euclidean distance from the centre of each transect to the centre of each nearby community (Table S4). For this, we considered all communities located up to 10 km from the centre of the surveyed transect. This distance was based on the evidence that hunters forage in areas located up to 10 km from their homes in the RESEX-TA (YMS Reis, unpublished data 2018). Distances were calculated in QGIS 2.18.9 (QGIS Development Team 2017) and the human population size of each community was obtained from the local ICMBio database from 2022. We assume that population size did not substantially change amongst surveyed years based on a comparison between the most current list of protected area beneficiaries (from 2022) and 2018, the previous year for which we had data (Spearman correlation, r = 0.95, p = 0.001).

We also measured the distance to the nearest road, defined as the distance from the middle of each transect to the nearest dirt road (Table S4). Because dirt roads are the main access ways in terra firme in the RESEX-TA, we assumed that transects closer to roads would be more accessed by humans than isolated transects (Benítez-López et al. Reference Benítez-López, Alkemade, Schipper, Ingram, Verweij, Eikelboom and Huijbregts2017, Beirne et al. Reference Beirne, Meier, Mbele, Menie, Froese, Okouyi and Poulsen2019).

Data analyses

We used generalized linear mixed models to relate variation in HI, distance to the nearest road and year of data collection (with the random term ‘transect’) to overall densities and biomasses of both medium-sized and large-sized groups separately and to the densities of the four selected taxa individually. We emphasize that it was only possible to analyse diurnal species that were commonly recorded (i.e., those that had greater detectability and therefore provided sufficient visual records for analysis); we excluded those game species that are rarer or more difficult to record using linear transects. Spearman tests between our predictor variables (i.e., HI, distance to the nearest road and year) showed that none was correlated at (>|0.50|) with any other, and thus we maintained all of these variables in the global model (mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values of anthropogenic variables in Table S5).

For each response variable, we constructed different models: the null model, models presenting a single or two predictors, models with all possible additive combinations of them and models with the interaction effects between HI and distance to the nearest road. We selected the best model(s) based on the AIC values (Burnham & Anderson Reference Burnham, Anderson, Burnham and Anderson2002), considering as parsimonious those presenting ΔAICc ≤ 2.0. When the null model appeared amongst the parsimonious models, we considered that no other model best explained the specific pattern than chance. We used the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the coefficient of each variable included in the best models and considered its influence when the 95% CI did not include 0. Due to convergence problems, we were unable to consider the interaction model for primates and Tinamidae. We transformed the data using log10 for groups or square root for taxa, and we confirmed data normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test. We used the Gaussian distribution family (‘identity’ linkage function) in all models. The analyses were performed using the package ‘glmmTMB’ (Brooks et al. Reference Brooks, Bolker, Kristensen and Maechler2022) in R 4.2.1 (R Core Development Team 2022).

To assess population trends over the years, we built state-space models that describe the stochastic and deterministic relationships between the observable and unobserved values using a Bayesian approach (Royle & Kéry Reference Royle and Kéry2007, Kéry Reference Kéry2010). We used as a response variable the annual mean density values of the medium-sized and large-sized groups and nine taxa considering all transects. The data were log transformed. The assessment was made by estimating the exponential growth rate r of density, in which the r value is a measure of change in population size that assumes positive, negative and zero values in increasing, declining and stable populations, respectively, and is calculated using Equation 3:

(3) $$r = {{log\left( {{N_t}/{N_0}} \right)} \over t}$$

where N 0 is the population size at the beginning of the period and N t is the population size after t years (Caughley & Sinclair Reference Caughley and Sinclair1994). A time-series mean r value ≥ 0 could suggest that populations are stable or growing, but values r values < 0 could be interpreted as evidence of a decline in the evaluated parameter (de Paula et al. Reference de Paula, Carvalho, Lopes, de Alencar Sousa, Maciel and Wariss2022). Thus, the r value was considered as indicative of the behaviour of density over the years. If the r values over the time series were equal to 0 or positive for the medium-sized and large-sized groups or the nine ‘individual‘ taxa, we assumed that populations were not declining; declining r values were taken to indicate otherwise. We used R version 4.2.1 (R Core Development Team 2022) and the ‘R2jags’ package (Su & Yajima Reference Su and Yajima2012) to fit the state-space model in JAGS (Plummer Reference Plummer2015). Non-informative priors were used for the density, and 200 000 Markov chain Monte Carlo iterations were run in two independent chains with a burn-in of 100 000 and a thinning factor of 0.06. Furthermore, the Gelman–Rubin (Rhat) diagnosis was used to evaluate parameter convergence (Gelman & Shirley Reference Gelman, Shirley, Brooks, Gelman, Jones and Meng2011), where values of 1.001 indicated a satisfactory model (the closer to 1, the better the model) and 1.1 was considered the acceptable limit. If the Bayesian 95% CI did not include 0, the r value was deemed substantially different from 0. The results are expressed as means with standard deviations.

Results

The mean density of the medium-sized group was 44.0 (±18.97) individuals/km2 (range 24.3–86.5 individuals/km2), whereas mean biomass was 101.0 (±63.43) kg/km2 (range 51.0–258.6 kg/km2; Table S6). Within this group, the taxa with the highest mean densities were the Dasyproctidae (D. croconota), with 15.9 individuals/km2, and the medium-sized primates (the four species grouped: C. unicolor, S. apella, P. irrorata, C. hoffmannsi), with 12.8 individuals/km2, and the lowest density was 2.1 individuals/km2 for Tinamidae (Tinamus spp. and Crypturellus spp.; Table S6). Some frequently hunted species, such as T. terrestris, were rarely recorded (Table S1).

The mean density of the large-sized group was 6.5 (±3.01) individuals/km2 (range 2.7–10.3 individuals/km2), whereas mean biomass was 121.8 (±65.66) kg/km2 (range 1.9–223.9 kg/km2; Table S6). The taxa with the highest mean densities were the Tayassuidae (D. tajacu and T. pecari), with 2.5 (±2.37) individuals/km2, and the Atelidae (A. nigerrima), with 2.1 (±1.63) individuals/km2. The Cervidae, with 1.9 (±0.78) individuals/km2, showed the lowest mean density amongst the large-sized group (Table S6).

Influence of anthropogenic stressors on the density and biomass of game fauna

The mean density and biomass of the medium-sized and large-sized groups were neither influenced by HI nor distance to the nearest road, and they did not vary amongst the years; the null model appeared amongst the parsimonious models in the group analyses (Table 1). However, different results were observed for the densities of individual taxa (Table 2). For Cervidae, only the null model was retained in the set of best models, whereas the predictor variables were included in the set of best models for the other three taxa. In particular, distance to the nearest road was included in the best model for both Dasyproctidae and Tinamidae, whereas HI and year were included in the best model explaining patterns of primate density (Table 2). The density of Dasyproctidae and Tinamidae decreased and increased, respectively, in transects further from roads, whereas the primate density increased in transects with high HI and also over the years (Fig. 2 & Table S7).

Table 1. Model selection table based on a candidate set of ‘best’ models (ΔAICc ≤ 2.00) predicting the density and biomass patterns for overall medium-sized and large-sized game species on eight transects across the Tapajós–Arapiuns Extractive Reserve. Models ranked by the AICc and ΔAICc values.

AICc = Akaike information criterion corrected for small sample sizes; df = degrees of freedom; logLik = log likelihood.

Table 2. Model selection table based on a candidate set of ‘best’ models (ΔAICc ≤ 2.00) predicting density patterns for Cervidae, Dasyproctidae, Tinamidae and primates on eight transects across the Tapajós–Arapiuns Extractive Reserve. Models ranked by the AICc and ΔAICc values.

AICc = Akaike information criterion corrected for small sample sizes; df = degrees of freedom; logLik = log likelihood.

Figure 2. Mean density of Dasyproctidae and Tinamidae in relation to distance to nearest road and average density of primates in relation to human intensity proxy and year in eight transects across the Tapajós–Arapiuns Extractive Reserve.

Population trends

The parameter convergence was satisfactory for all Bayesian models (Table S8), and the exponential growth rate r did not differ from 0 for density averages for the game group and taxa; density remained stable for both the medium-sized and large-sized groups, as well as for the nine taxa (Tinamidae, Psophiidae, Cracidae, Dasyproctidae, primates, Procyonidae, Atelidae, Cervidae and Tayassuidae) across all sampled transects in the RESEX-TA, indicating that the game populations were not declining over the years assessed (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Annual average density, expressed as log(x + 1), of the medium-sized and large-sized game groups and nine individual taxa (Tinamidae, Psophiidae, Cracidae, Dasyproctidae, Primates, Procyonidae, Atelidae, Cervidae and Tayassuidae) in eight study transects in the Tapajós–Arapiuns Extractive Reserve from 2015 to 2020. Lines represent observed and estimated densities. The grey regions represent the confidence intervals.

Discussion

This comprises the first study assessing the responses of vertebrate game species over a temporal series based on the Brazilian Monitora participatory monitoring programme. Contrary to our initial expectations, anthropogenic variables failed to predict overall density and biomass patterns of both medium- and large-sized groups. However, the densities of both Dasyproctidae and Tinamidae were influenced by distance to the nearest road, whereas primates were affected by year and HI. Mammal and bird populations remained stable over the 6 years considering all transects pooled together, indicating no decline or increase in the game taxa across the RESEX-TA over this period.

Our data are limited to a set of game species liable to be recorded through line transect diurnal surveys, therefore excluding other important game species such as lowland paca (Cuniculus paca) and armadillo (Dasypodidae). Additionally, some species that could have been analysed had very few records (e.g., T. terrestris and T. pecari), and this could indicate past population losses. Although they have been maintained for over 6 years, our data are confined to only eight transects. Furthermore, our analyses at the taxonomic order and family levels might obscure patterns in population densities. Future studies should include camera-trapping data to better assess temporal changes over the complete vertebrate game assemblage. In addition, our 6 years constitute a short period given the longevity and reproduction rates of vertebrate species; long-term monitoring is essential to assess overall and species-specific density patterns over generations.

Although we acknowledge these limitations to the data, we emphasize the robustness of the information gained that could help to improve our understanding of the patterns of terrestrial vertebrate densities in a populated forest reserve. We also demonstrate the value of data derived from long-term participatory monitoring programmes in Amazonian reserves.

Our study reveals that overall densities of the large- and medium-sized game vertebrates involved were unaffected by anthropogenic pressure over these years. The local people have historically and continuously hunted game fauna across the RESEX-TA; however, a previous study in this area showed that the preferred species still comprise the most frequently hunted ones (Reis et al. Reference Reis, Soares, Maduro, Spinola and da Rocha2022). Preferred game species in heavily hunted areas usually exhibit low densities, become rare or even become locally extinct and therefore drop from hunting profiles (Peres & Palacios Reference Peres and Palacios2007). Alternative sources of animal protein – mainly fish stocks (Oliveira et al. Reference Oliveira, Junior and Chaves2005, Braga et al. Reference Braga, Silva, Rebêlo, Jensen and Fugimura2022) and small domestic animals (e.g., pigs and chickens) – also occur in the Reserve. In addition, commercial hunting to supply urban centres is non-existent. Finally, the preservation zone, where subsistence hunting and other anthropogenic activities are prohibited, occupies more than 20% of the total area of the RESEX-TA (Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade 2014) and can act as a ‘source’ of animals to the ‘sink’ areas (Novaro et al. Reference Novaro, Redford and Bodmer2000).

Anthropogenic stressors evidently had a substantial influence on the density of some species or taxa, but there were contrasting patterns. In particular, agoutis (D. croconota) were substantially affected by the distance to the nearest road, although greater densities were observed in transects near the road. In fact, agoutis can cope with disturbed forested areas, such as forest edges, which are often related to road creation (Peres Reference Peres2001). For instance, forest fragmentation exerted a positive effect on agouti density in forest patches located in the Central Brazilian Amazonia, and individuals were frequently recorded in forest edges adjacent to open areas and dirt roads (Jorge Reference Jorge2008). Agoutis are granivorous caviomorph rodents, but despite their feeding mainly on fruits and seeds, their diet is complemented by leaves, roots, fungi and small invertebrates (Henry Reference Henry1999, Silvius & Fragoso Reference Silvius and Fragoso2003, Dubost & Henry Reference Dubost and Henry2006). It is probable that agoutis are benefitting from a variety of food resources present at forest edges, including natural resources and anthropogenic ones, thus increasing their density. Furthermore, agoutis may be benefitting from food resources from farms (Abrahams et al. Reference Abrahams, Peres and Costa2018) or from the absence or low presence of predators, such as jaguars, close to settlements (Carvalho & Pezzuti Reference Carvalho and Pezzuti2010). In addition, we noted that the density of agoutis in the RESEX-TA is substantially higher than in other Amazonian protected areas (Calouro & Marinho-Filho Reference Calouro and Marinho-Filho2006, Rosas Reference Rosas2006, Endo et al. Reference Endo, Peres, Salas, Mori, Sanchez-Vega and Shepard2010, Mayor et al. Reference Mayor, Pérez-Peña, Bowler, Puertas, Kirkland and Bodmer2015), further indicating that hunting is not threatening their populations in the studied protected area.

The Tinamidae, encompassing both Tinamus spp. and Crypturellus spp., were significantly influenced by anthropogenic pressure, presenting higher density estimates in transects far from roads. Although hunters prefer eating and therefore hunting large mammals (Constantino et al. Reference Constantino, Fortini, Kaxinawa, Kaxinawa, Kaxinawa and Kaxinawa2008), large birds are also important hunting species, especially in heavily hunted forest sites (Thiollay Reference Thiollay2005). In fact, residents in the RESEX-TA reported that tinamids can be hunted, but they are not the animals most frequently killed (YMS Reis, unpublished data 2018). Furthermore, large forest-dwelling birds such as the large tinamids exhibit life-history characteristics associated with greater sensitivity to anthropogenic disturbances, such as a frugivore–granivore diet and forest dependence (Vetter et al. Reference Vetter, Hansbauer, Vegvari and Storch2011). Two hypotheses might explain our observations regarding these animals. Firstly, easier road access of hunters might have facilitated their capture, as corroborated by the great sensitivity of large birds to hunting pressure (Peres Reference Peres2001, Urquiza-Haas et al. Reference Urquiza-Haas, Peres and Dolman2009, Reference Urquiza-Haas, Peres and Dolman2011). Secondly, as tinamid species are highly dependent on forest-interior environments, they might consequently avoid transiting in regions close to open areas. No individuals were seen in two transects close to roads in some monitoring years, and we found a low density of tinamids in the RESEX-TA (mean ± SD = 2.1 ± 1.19 individuals/km2) in contrast to other Amazonian protected areas (Peres & Nascimento Reference Peres and Nascimento2006, Endo et al. Reference Endo, Peres, Salas, Mori, Sanchez-Vega and Shepard2010). Although our time-series analyses revealed that tinamid density did not decline in the transects over the period, ensuring the continuity of monitoring in the same transects will enable us to identify whether hunting is reducing population sizes in the transects near roads and thus whether hunting regulations might be necessary.

Our findings also revealed that the density of primates was positively related to both HI and time over the 6 years of the monitoring programme. Medium-sized primates are relatively tolerant to subsistence hunting (Peres Reference Peres2000, Peres & Palacios Reference Peres and Palacios2007), and, in our study, the high number of sightings of capuchins was mainly responsible for this result. They are well known for their ability to adapt to disturbed environments and to exploit novel resources, such as plantations, which are common near the transects (Hill Reference Hill2000). In addition, this species can replace a diet of naturally distributed resources with anthropogenic food products (see Mikich & Liebsch Reference Mikich and Liebsch2009, Liebsch & Mikich Reference Liebsch and Mikich2015). It is possible that their high behavioural flexibility (Fragaszy et al. Reference Fragaszy, Fedigan and Visalberghi2004) and proximity to cultivation areas might explain the positive influence of HI on primate density. Furthermore, the primates might be benefitting from resources that were previously exploited by larger and more vulnerable species (Peres & Dolman Reference Peres and Dolman2000), such as the spider monkey, which was not analysed in this study. This may be leading to an increase in their populations, whereas larger species may be declining in number. The spider monkey has probably been extirpated in many parts of the Arapiuns region by hunting (Peres et al. Reference Peres, Barlow and Haugaasen2003), and only a single record was documented by experienced monitors within the Tapajós region through the Monitora Program. The increase in primate density over the period might be associated with the reduction in hunting pressure in response to increased local awareness and environmental education activities carried out through the Monitora Program. In particular, since the establishment of the monitoring programme, several educational programmes have been carried out intending to demonstrate the importance of forest species to both ecosystem functionality and the delivery of ecosystem services. We have noticed a growing awareness amongst local residents of the importance of wild fauna. Considering that primates were not favourite targets in the RESEX-TA, it is possible that the hunting pressure on this group declined over this period, therefore being reflected in their greater densities. The continuity of the monitoring in the Reserve, together with interviews of local hunters, would provide more information regarding this observed pattern.

The densities of medium- and large-sized groups and individual taxa remained stable during the 6 years of the monitoring programme in the RESEX-TA, suggesting that, at least within this period, hunting was not threatening diurnal, forest game species. Subsistence hunting was also not considered a severe threat to game species in two other Amazonian sustainable-use extractive reserves, even for those that are less resilient and with lower fertility rates (de Paula et al. Reference de Paula, Carvalho, Lopes, de Alencar Sousa, Maciel and Wariss2022). Elsewhere across the Amazon basin, terrestrial wildlife species showed resilience to subsistence hunting due to there being large tracts of continuous forests that are virtually inaccessible to hunters (Iwamura et al. Reference Iwamura, Lambin, Silvius, Luzar and Fragoso2014, Antunes et al. Reference Antunes, Fewster, Venticinque, Peres, Levi, Rohe and Shepard2016). The environmental and social configuration of the RESEX-TA could favour a source–sink dynamic, whereby large expanses of lightly populated, undisturbed forest might serve as population ‘sources’ that can refuel ‘sink’ areas where hunting takes place due to accessibility and proximity to local communities (Novaro et al. Reference Novaro, Redford and Bodmer2000). It seems that the high forest cover within the RESEX-TA, comprising c. 70% of the territory, has played a crucial role in supporting the persistence of game populations. In addition, 20% of the RESEX-TA is designated as a preservation zone, where anthropogenic activities do not occur. Large tracts of forests coupled with limited human pressure may be providing the necessary conditions for game populations to thrive (Naranjo & Bodmer Reference Naranjo and Bodmer2007, Ohl-Schacherer et al. Reference Ohl-Schacherer, Shepard, Kaplan, Peres, Levi and Yu2007).

Conclusion

Our study provides new information on the status of game populations within a sustainable-use protected area in the Amazon basin for both local people and reserve managers. Moreover, although the analyses did not indicate an influence of the evaluated anthropogenic variables on the populations of medium- and large-sized vertebrates considered in the evaluated time series, we recognize the importance of evaluating the RESEX-TA system within a broader context. Previous studies carried out in this same area have documented the influence of wildfires and hunting pressure on forest structure and wildlife game populations (Peres et al. Reference Peres, Barlow and Haugaasen2003, Barlow & Peres Reference Barlow and Peres2006). The history of wildfires and hunting pressure in the region, combined with the relatively high human population density (c. 3.55 persons/km2 for the entire region; Silva et al. Reference Silva, Nascimento, Magalhães and Spínola2022, Instituto Socioambiental 2023), might be contributing to a semi-defaunated scenario (i.e., instead of a pervasive loss of fauna, the RESEX-TA might have experienced losses of certain species prior to our study, being reflected as a low density of game species). Therefore, the stability of species population densities over the 6 years analysed might be an indicator that the system is currently in a state of fragile equilibrium, potentially maintaining stability with an altered ecological structure. Further investigation, including continuous monitoring and interviews with hunters, could provide deeper insights that would help us to clarify these reflections.

Finally, we acknowledge the potential of community-based long-term biodiversity monitoring in tropical protected areas as a tool to evaluate species status and potentially subsidize effective management actions. However, given the small sample size in this study, we recognize the need for further research to provide more robust evidence on this matter, particularly regarding endangered large vertebrates.

In a broader context, our study could contribute to the discussion regarding the effectiveness of sustainable-use protected areas for biodiversity conservation (Terborgh & Peres Reference Terborgh and Peres2017), demonstrating their potential for safeguarding more abundant and resilient species in situ. However, for large threatened species, substantial anthropogenic pressure could potentially compromise species conservation, as indicated by past population losses. In addition to the growth of the human population and the increase in forest fires in the region, the lack of consensus regarding the legality of subsistence hunting by environmental agencies has also contributed to this situation. In the first decade of the 2000s, local residents developed a Natural Resources Use Plan for the protected area – a document containing informal agreements for wildlife use. However, this document is no longer valid. Even though hunting is illegal in Brazil, failure to comply with these agreements does not lead to fines or other forms of penalization for the hunter but can compromise the sustainability of hunting for some species. In this context, Tomas et al. (Reference Tomas, Magnusson, Mourão, Bergallo, Linares and Crawshaw2018) highlighted the need for the world’s largest tropical country to implement a comprehensive and modern environmental policy for fauna management. However, until this occurs, we recommend sharing and discussing our results with local communities in the RESEX-TA to facilitating the formation of collective decisions regarding game management. In particular, we emphasize that establishing formal rules is a key management tool that can contribute to achieving hunting sustainability over the long term, and we expressly recommend banning the hunting of endangered species such as tapirs and peccaries.

Supplementary material

For supplementary material accompanying this paper, visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892924000031.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the community members and professionals involved in the Monitora Program and the local management of the RESEX-TA. We are also grateful to the postgraduate program in Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation of the Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (UESC) for providing the course ‘Análise de Dados e Redação de Manuscritos Científicos’, which contributed to the development of the manuscript. In particular, we are grateful to CR Cassano, J Pezzuti, E Carvalho, FB Pereira and W Endo for valuable comments on previous versions of this manuscript. Finally, we also thank H El Bizri, M de Paula and E Carvalho, who shared their analytical knowledge.

Financial support

This study was supported by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) – Brazil (CAPES – Financing code 001) and CNPq (productivity grant 304189/2022-7 to MB).

Competing interests

The authors declare none.

Ethical standards

The study complies with the current laws of Brazil, with the use of the database from the Monitora biodiversity monitoring programme authorized by the Biodiversity Authorization and Information System (SISBIO) of the Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio).

References

Abrahams, MI, Peres, CA, Costa, HC (2018) Manioc losses by terrestrial vertebrates in western Brazilian Amazonia. Journal of Wildlife Management 82: 734746.10.1002/jwmg.21443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antunes, AP, Fewster, RM, Venticinque, EM, Peres, CA, Levi, T, Rohe, F, Shepard, GH (2016) Empty forest or empty rivers? A century of commercial hunting in Amazonia. Science Advances 2: e1600936.10.1126/sciadv.1600936CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ayres, JM, Ayres, C (1979) Aspectos da caça no alto rio Aripuanã. Acta amazônica 9: 287298.10.1590/1809-43921979092287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, J, Peres, CA (2006) Effects of single and recurrent wildfires on fruit production and large vertebrate abundance in a central Amazonian forest. Biodiversity & Conservation 15: 9851012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beirne, C, Meier, AC, Mbele, AE, Menie, GM, Froese, G, Okouyi, J, Poulsen, JR (2019) Participatory monitoring reveals village-centered gradients of mammalian defaunation in central Africa. Biological conservation 233: 228238.10.1016/j.biocon.2019.02.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benchimol, M (2016) Medium and large-sized mammals. In: TH, Larsen (ed.), Core Standardized Methods for Rapid Biological Field Assessment (pp. 3748). Arlington, VA, USA: Conservation International.Google Scholar
Benítez-López, A, Alkemade, R, Schipper, AM, Ingram, DJ, Verweij, PA, Eikelboom, JAJ, Huijbregts, MAJ, (2017) The impact of hunting on tropical mammal and bird populations. Science 356: 180183.10.1126/science.aaj1891CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benítez-López, A, Santini, L, Schipper, AM, Busana, M, Huijbregts, MA (2019) Intact but empty forests? Patterns of hunting-induced mammal defaunation in the tropics. PLoS Biology 17: e3000247.10.1371/journal.pbio.3000247CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernardo, CSS, Galetti, M (2004) Densidade e tamanho populacional de primatas em um fragmento florestal no sudeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 21: 827832.10.1590/S0101-81752004000400017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, TMP, Silva, JT, Rebêlo, GH, Jensen, L, Fugimura, MMS (2022) Manejo dos recursos pesqueiros pelos ribeirinhos do baixo tapajós (pesca artesanal e piscicultura). In: DFC Andrade, JN Spínola (eds), O Rio que nos une (pp. 205–216). Brasília. Brazil: ICMBio.Google Scholar
Brooks, M, Bolker, B, Kristensen, K, Maechler, M (2022) Package ‘glmmTMB’ [www document]. URL http://cran.uni-muenster.de/web/packages/glmmTMB/glmmTMB.pdf Google Scholar
Burnham, KP, Anderson, DR (2002) Information and likelihood theory: a basis for model selection and inference. In: Burnham, KP, Anderson, DR (eds), Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, (pp. 4997). Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
Calouro, AM, Marinho-Filho, JS (2006) A caça e a pesca de subsistência entre seringueiros ribeirinhos e não-ribeirinhos da Floresta Estadual do Antimary (AC). In: PM Drumond (ed.), Fauna do Acre (pp. 109–135). Rio Branco, Brazil: EDUFAC.Google Scholar
Cardillo, M, Mace, GM, Jones, KE, Bielby, J, Bininda-Emonds, ORP, Sechrest, W et al. (2005) Multiple causes of high extinction risk in large mammal species. Science 309: 12391241.10.1126/science.1116030CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carvalho, E, Pezzuti, J (2010) Hunting of jaguars and pumas in the Tapajós–Arapiuns Extractive Reserve, Brazilian Amazonia. Oryx 44: 610612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho Junior, EAR (2008) Caçando onças na Reserva Extrativista Tapajós–Arapiuns. Relatório de atividades. Santarém, Brazil: ICMBio.Google Scholar
Caughley, G, Sinclair, AR (1994) Wildlife Ecology and Management. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Constantino, PL, Fortini, LB, Kaxinawa, FRS, Kaxinawa, AM, Kaxinawa, ES, Kaxinawa, AP et al. (2008) Indigenous collaborative research for wildlife management in Amazonia: the case of the Kaxinawá, Acre, Brazil. Biological Conservation 141: 27182719.10.1016/j.biocon.2008.08.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronemberger, C, Ribeiro, KT, Acosta, RK, de Andrade, DFC, Marini-Filho, OJ, Masuda, LSM, Mendes, KR (2023) Social participation in the Brazilian National Biodiversity Monitoring Program leads to multiple socioenvironmental outcomes. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 8: 32.Google Scholar
da Veiga, JE, Ehlers, E (2009) Diversidade biológica e dinamismo econômico no meio rural. In Economia do meio ambiente: teoria e prática (pp. 271–290). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Ed. Campus.Google Scholar
Danielsen, F, Eicken, H, Funder, M, Johnson, N, Lee, O, Theilade, I et al. (2022) Community monitoring of natural resource systems and the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 47: 637670.10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-022325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danielsen, F, Enghoff, M, Poulsen, MK, Funder, M, Jensen, PM, Burgess, ND (2021) The concept, practice, application, and results of locally based monitoring of the environment. BioScience 71: 484502.10.1093/biosci/biab021CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Paula, MJ, Carvalho, EA, Lopes, CKM, de Alencar Sousa, R, Maciel, ELP, Wariss, M et al. (2022) Hunting sustainability within two eastern Amazon extractive reserves. Environmental Conservation 49: 9098.10.1017/S0376892922000145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubost, G, Henry, O (2006) Comparison of diets of the acouchy, agouti and paca, the three largest terrestrial rodents of French Guianana forests. Journal of Tropical Ecology 22: 641651.10.1017/S0266467406003440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endo, W, Peres, CA, Salas, E, Mori, S, Sanchez-Vega, JL, Shepard, GH et al. (2010) Game vertebrate densities in hunted and nonhunted forest sites in Manu National Park, Peru. Biotropica 42: 251261.10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00546.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fragaszy, DM, Fedigan, L, Visalberghi, E (2004) The Complete Capuchin: The Biology of the Genus Cebus. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, A, Shirley, K (2011) Inference from simulations and monitoring convergence. In: Brooks, S, Gelman, A, Jones, GL, Meng, XL (eds), Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (pp. 163174). Boca Raton, FL, USA: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.Google Scholar
Henry, O (1999) Frugivory and the importance of seeds in the diet of the orange-rumped agouti (Dasyprocta leporina) in French Guiana. Journal of Tropical Ecology 15: 291300.10.1017/S0266467499000826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, CM (2000) Conflict of interest between people and baboons: crop raiding in Uganda. International Journal of Primatology 21: 299315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (1992) Manual técnico da vegetação brasileira. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: IBGE.Google Scholar
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (2014) Plano de Manejo da Reserva Extrativista Tapajós–Arapiuns. Brasília, Brazil: ICMBio.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, Centro de Previsão de Tempo e Estudos Climáticos (2023) Precipitação diária 2023 [www document]. URL http://clima1.cptec.inpe.br/estacaochuvosa/pt Google Scholar
Instituto Socioambiental (2023) Unidades de Conservação no Brasil [www document]. URL https://uc.socioambiental.org/pt-br/arp/1353 Google Scholar
Iwamura, T, Lambin, EF, Silvius, KM, Luzar, JB, Fragoso, JM (2014) Agent-based modeling of hunting and subsistence agriculture on indigenous lands: understanding interactions between social and ecological systems. Environmental Modelling & Software 58: 109127.10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.03.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerozolimski, A, Peres, CA (2003) Bringing home the biggest bacon: a cross-site analysis of the structure of hunter-kill profiles in Neotropical forests. Biological Conservation 111: 415425.10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00310-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorge, MLS (2008) Effects of forest fragmentation on two sister genera of Amazonian rodents (Myoprocta acouchy and Dasyprocta leporina). Biological Conservation 141: 617623.10.1016/j.biocon.2007.11.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kéry, M (2010) Introduction to WinBUGS for Ecologists: A Bayesian Approach to Regression, ANOVA, Mixed Models and Related Analyses. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Koerner, SE, Poulsen, JR, Blanchard, EJ, Okouyi, J, Clark, CJ (2017) Vertebrate community composition and diversity declines along a defaunation gradient radiating from rural villages in Gabon. Journal of Applied Ecology 54: 805814.10.1111/1365-2664.12798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebsch, D, Mikich, SB (2015) First record of Eucalyptus spp. bark-stripping by brown-capuchin monkeys (Sapajus nigritus, Primates: Cebidae). Ciência Florestal 25: 501505.10.5902/1980509818469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lima, D, Pozzobon, J (2005) Amazônia socioambiental: sustentabilidade ecológica e diversidade social. Estudos Avançados 19: 4576.10.1590/S0103-40142005000200004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, RH, Diamond, JM, Karr, JR (1972) Density compensation in island faunas. Ecology 53: 330342.10.2307/1934090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayor, P, Pérez-Peña, P, Bowler, M, Puertas, PE, Kirkland, M, Bodmer, R (2015) Effects of selective logging on large mammal populations in a remote indigenous territory in the northern Peruvian Amazon. Ecology and Society 20: 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikich, SB, Liebsch, D (2009) O macaco-prego e os plantios de Pinus spp. Comunicado técnico. Embrapa Florestas 234: 15.Google Scholar
Montag, FFA, Prudente, BS, Ferreira, CP, Dutra, GM, Benone, NL, Barbosa, TAP, Ruffeil, TOB (2012) Ictiofauna na Reserva Extrativista Tapajós–Arapiuns, Estado do Pará, Brasil. Pará, Brazil: UFPA.Google Scholar
Naranjo, EJ, Bodmer, RE (2007) Source–sink systems and conservation of hunted ungulates in the Lacandon Forest, Mexico. Biological Conservation 138: 412420.10.1016/j.biocon.2007.05.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novaro, AJ, Redford, KH, Bodmer, RE (2000) Effect of hunting in source–sink systems in the Neotropics. Conservation Biology 14: 713721.10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98452.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohl-Schacherer, J, Shepard, GH Jr, Kaplan, H, Peres, CA, Levi, T, Yu, DW (2007) The sustainability of subsistence hunting by Matsigenka native communities in Manu National Park, Peru. Conservation Biology 21: 11741185.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00759.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliveira, ACM, Junior, OC, Chaves, R (2005) Gestão participativa e a atividade de caça na Reserva Extrativista do Tapajós–Arapiuns, Santarém, PA. Raízes 23: 4251.10.37370/raizes.2004.v23.231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peres, CA (1999) General guidelines for standardizing line-transect surveys of tropical forest primates. Neotropical Primates 7: 1116.10.62015/np.1999.v7.414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peres, CA (2000) Effects of subsistence hunting on vertebrate community structure in Amazonian forests. Conservation Biology 14: 240253.10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98485.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peres, CA (2001) Synergistic effects of subsistence hunting and habitat fragmentation on Amazonian forest vertebrates. Conservation Biology 15: 14901505.10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.01089.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peres, CA, Barlow, J, Haugaasen, T (2003) Vertebrate responses to surface wildfires in a central Amazonian forest. Oryx 37: 97109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peres, CA, Dolman, PM (2000) Density compensation in neotropical primate communities: evidence from 56 hunted and nonhunted Amazonian forests of varying productivity. Oecologia 122: 175189.10.1007/PL00008845CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peres, CA, Nascimento, HS (2006) Impact of game hunting by the Kayapó of south-eastern Amazonia: implications for wildlife conservation in tropical forest Indigenous reserves. Human Exploitation and Biodiversity Conservation 15: 26272653.10.1007/s10531-005-5406-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peres, CA, Palacios, E (2007) Basin-wide effects of game harvest on vertebrate population densities in Amazonian forests: implications for animal-mediated seed dispersal. Biotropica 39: 304315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plummer, M (2015) JAGS version 4.0.0 user manual 0-41 [www document]. URL https://www.uvm.edu/~bbeckage/Teaching/PBIO_294/Manuals/manual.jags.pdf Google Scholar
QGIS Development Team (2017) QGIS Geographic Information System [www document]. URL https://qgis.org/en/site/ Google Scholar
R Core Development Team (2022) R: a language and environment for statistical computing [www document]. URL: https://www.r-project.org/ Google Scholar
Reis, YMS, Benchimol, M (2023) Effectiveness of community-based monitoring projects of terrestrial game fauna in the tropics: a global review. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation 21: 172179.10.1016/j.pecon.2023.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, YMS, Soares, CCM, Maduro, R, Spinola, JN, da Rocha, BD (2022) O padrão da caça de subsistência em uma reserva extrativista na Amazônia oriental, Brasil. Etnobiología 20: 1826.Google Scholar
Reis, YMS, Valsecchi, J, Queiroz, H (2018) Caracterização do uso da fauna silvestre para subsistência em uma unidade de conservação no Oeste do Pará. Biodiversidade Brasileira 9: 187202.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, KT (2018) Estratégia do Programa Nacional de Monitoramento da Biodiversidade – Programa Monitora: estrutura, articulações, perspectivas. Brasília, Brazil: ICMBio.Google Scholar
Robinson, JG, Redford, KH (1986) Body size, diet, and population density of Neotropical forest mammals. The American Naturalist 128: 665680.10.1086/284596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosas, GKC (2006) Pressão de caça, abundância, densidade e riqueza de mamíferos em duas áreas de coleta de castanha-do-brasil situadas no sudoeste do estado do Acre, Brasil. Dissertation. Rio Branco, Brazil: Universidade Federal do Acre.Google Scholar
Royle, JA, Kéry, M (2007) A Bayesian state-space formulation of dynamic occupancy models. Ecology 88: 18131823.10.1890/06-0669.1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sampaio, R, Morato, RG, Royle, A, Abrahams, MI, Peres, CA, Chiarello, AG (2023) Vertebrate population changes induced by hunting in Amazonian sustainable-use protected areas. Biological Conservation 284: 110206.10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saúde & Alegria (2012) Mapeamentos Participativos e elaboração de Planos de Uso: uma experiência nas comunidades de Anã, Arimum, Atodi e Vila Amazonas nas margens do Rio Arapiuns [www document]. URL https://saudeealegria.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/PSA_CartilhaPlanoDeUso.pdf Google Scholar
Scabin, AB, Peres, CA (2021) Hunting pressure modulates the composition and size structure of terrestrial and arboreal vertebrates in Amazonian forests. Biodiversity and Conservation 30: 36133632.10.1007/s10531-021-02266-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmeller, DS, Böhm, M, Arvanitidis, C, Barber-Meyer, S, Brummitt, N, Chandler, M et al. (2017) Building capacity in biodiversity monitoring at the global scale. Biodiversity and Conservation 26: 27652790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, MJS, Nascimento, BDC, Magalhães, LFR, Spínola, JN (2022) Histórico de criação e implementação da Floresta Nacional do Tapajós e da Reserva Extrativista Tapajós–Arapiuns. In: DFC Andrade, JN Spínola (eds), O Rio que nos une (pp. 205–216). Brasília, Brazil: ICMBio.Google Scholar
Silvius, KM, Fragoso, JV (2003) Red-rumped agouti (Dasyprocta leporina) home range use in an Amazonian forest: implications for the aggregated distribution of forest trees. Biotropica 35: 7483.Google Scholar
Su, YS, Yajima, M (2012) R2jags: a package for running JAGS from R. R package version 0.03-08 [www document]. URL https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/R2jags/index.html Google Scholar
Terborgh, J, Peres, CA (2017) Do community-managed forests work? A biodiversity perspective. Land 6: 22.10.3390/land6020022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiollay, JM (2005) Effects of hunting on Guianan forest game birds. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 11211135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, L, Buckland, ST, Rexstad, EA, Laake, JL, Strindberg, S, Hedley, SL et al. (2010) Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. Journal of Applied Ecology 47: 514.10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01737.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomas, WM, Magnusson, W, Mourão, G, Bergallo, H, Linares, S, Crawshaw, P Jr et al. (2018). Meio século da proibição da caça no Brasil: consequências de uma política inadequada de gestão de vida selvagem. Biodiversidade Brasileira 8: 7581.Google Scholar
Urquiza-Haas, T, Peres, CA, Dolman, PM (2009) Regional scale effects of human density and forest disturbance on large-bodied vertebrates throughout the Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico. Biological Conservation 142: 134148.10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urquiza-Haas, T, Peres, CA, Dolman, PM (2011) Large vertebrate responses to forest cover and hunting pressure in communal landholdings and protected areas of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Animal Conservation 14: 271282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valsechi, JV (2013) Caça de animais silvestres nas reservas de desenvolvimento sustentável Mamirauá e Amanã. Belo Horizonte, Brazil: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.Google Scholar
Veiga, JE, Ehlers, E (2009) Diversidade biológica e dinamismo econômico no meio rural. In: PH May (ed.), Economia do meio ambiente: teoria e prática (pp. 271–290). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Ed. Campus.Google Scholar
Veloso, HP, Rangel-Filho, ALR, Lima, JCA (1991) Classificação da vegetação brasileira, adaptada a um sistema universal. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: IBGE.Google Scholar
Vetter, D, Hansbauer, M, Vegvari, Z, Storch, I (2011) Predictors of forest fragmentation sensitivity in Neotropical vertebrates: a quantitative review. Ecography 34: 18.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06453.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Location of the Tapajós–Arapiuns Extractive Reserve (RESEX) in the cities of Santarém and Aveiro (Pará), Brazil.

Figure 1

Table 1. Model selection table based on a candidate set of ‘best’ models (ΔAICc ≤ 2.00) predicting the density and biomass patterns for overall medium-sized and large-sized game species on eight transects across the Tapajós–Arapiuns Extractive Reserve. Models ranked by the AICc and ΔAICc values.

Figure 2

Table 2. Model selection table based on a candidate set of ‘best’ models (ΔAICc ≤ 2.00) predicting density patterns for Cervidae, Dasyproctidae, Tinamidae and primates on eight transects across the Tapajós–Arapiuns Extractive Reserve. Models ranked by the AICc and ΔAICc values.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Mean density of Dasyproctidae and Tinamidae in relation to distance to nearest road and average density of primates in relation to human intensity proxy and year in eight transects across the Tapajós–Arapiuns Extractive Reserve.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Annual average density, expressed as log(x + 1), of the medium-sized and large-sized game groups and nine individual taxa (Tinamidae, Psophiidae, Cracidae, Dasyproctidae, Primates, Procyonidae, Atelidae, Cervidae and Tayassuidae) in eight study transects in the Tapajós–Arapiuns Extractive Reserve from 2015 to 2020. Lines represent observed and estimated densities. The grey regions represent the confidence intervals.

Supplementary material: File

Reis and Benchimol supplementary material 1

Reis and Benchimol supplementary material
Download Reis and Benchimol supplementary material 1(File)
File 20.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Reis and Benchimol supplementary material 2

Reis and Benchimol supplementary material
Download Reis and Benchimol supplementary material 2(File)
File 24.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Reis and Benchimol supplementary material 3

Reis and Benchimol supplementary material
Download Reis and Benchimol supplementary material 3(File)
File 24.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Reis and Benchimol supplementary material 4

Reis and Benchimol supplementary material
Download Reis and Benchimol supplementary material 4(File)
File 27.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Reis and Benchimol supplementary material 5

Reis and Benchimol supplementary material
Download Reis and Benchimol supplementary material 5(File)
File 22.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Reis and Benchimol supplementary material 6

Reis and Benchimol supplementary material
Download Reis and Benchimol supplementary material 6(File)
File 28.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Reis and Benchimol supplementary material 7

Reis and Benchimol supplementary material
Download Reis and Benchimol supplementary material 7(File)
File 27.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Reis and Benchimol supplementary material 8

Reis and Benchimol supplementary material
Download Reis and Benchimol supplementary material 8(File)
File 24.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Reis and Benchimol supplementary material 9

Reis and Benchimol supplementary material
Download Reis and Benchimol supplementary material 9(File)
File 14.8 KB