Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:36:48.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fish farms as amphibian habitats: factors affecting amphibian species richness and community structure at carp ponds in Poland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2010

JANUSZ KLOSKOWSKI
JANUSZ KLOSKOWSKI*
Affiliation:
Department of Nature Conservation, Institute of Biology, M. Curie-Skłodowska University, Akademicka 19, 20-033 Lublin, Poland
*
*Correspondence: Dr J. Kloskowski e-mail: januszkl@poczta.umcs.lublin.pl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Open fish ponds are a potential consideration in the conservation of biodiversity, yet information on their suitability for breeding amphibians remains lacking. This study examined amphibian responses to attributes of pond habitats at common carp Cyprinus carpio farms in eastern Poland, focusing on features typical of traditional European cyprinid culture. Canonical correspondence analysis identified age of fish stocks, density of predatory Anisoptera and pond hydroperiod as the factors most strongly influencing amphibian community composition expressed in terms of larval abundance. Separation of fish age-cohorts into different growing ponds was decisive for differential occurrence patterns of individual amphibian taxa. The amphibian assemblage was significantly nested: ponds stocked with young-of-the-year fish supported relatively high numbers of amphibian taxa, including endangered species known to be vulnerable to fish, while ponds containing one- and two-year-old carp harboured only more common taxa. These results suggest that traditional carp pond culture characterized by a spatially discrete distribution of inter-annual cohorts includes habitats compatible with amphibian conservation. However, a flexible conservational approach is needed: ponds stocked with young fish produce secondary breeding habitats for amphibians, but presence of large-sized carp is associated with severe species loss.

Keywords

amphibian conservationaquaculturemodified landscapepond-breeding amphibianspond managementsize-structured interactions
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , June 2010 , pp. 187 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atmar, W. & Patterson, B.D. (1993) The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat. Oecologia 96: 373–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atmar, W. & Patterson, B.D. (1995) The Nestedness Temperature Calculator: A Visual Basic Program. Chicago, IL, USA: AICS Research.Google Scholar
Babik, W. & Rafiński, J. (2001) Amphibian breeding site characteristics in the Western Carpathians, Poland. Herpetological Journal 11: 41–51.Google Scholar
Bardsley, L. & Beebee, T.J.C. (1998) Interspecific competition between larvae is not an important structuring force in mixed communities of Rana and Bufo on an English sand-dune system. Ecography 21: 449–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beveridge, M.C.M., Ross, L.G. & Kelly, L.A. (1994) Aquaculture and biodiversity. Ambio 23: 497–502.Google Scholar
Billard, R., ed. (1999) Carp: Biology and Culture. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
Binckley, C.A. & Resetarits, W.J. Jr (2003) Functional equivalence of non–lethal effects: generalized fish avoidance determines distribution of gray treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis, larvae. Oikos 102: 623–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brönmark, C. & Edenhamn, P. (1994) Does the presence of fish affect the distribution of tree frogs (Hyla arborea)? Conservation Biology 8: 841–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, J.P., Thorp, J.H. & Jervey, T.O. (1980) Predator-prey relationships among larval dragonflies, salamanders, and frogs. Oecologia 46: 285–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denoël, M. & Ficetola, G.F. (2008) Conservation of newt guilds in an agricultural landscape of Belgium: the importance of aquatic and terrestrial habitats. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 18: 714–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Paniagua, C. (1985) Larval diets related to morphological characters of five anuran species in the biological reserve of Doñana (Huelva, Spain). Amphibia-Reptilia 6: 307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dormann, C.F., McPherson, J.M., Araújo, M.B., Bivand, R., Bolliger, J., Carl, G., Davies, R.G., Hirzel, A., Jetz, W., Kissling, W.D., Kühn, I., Ohlemüller, R., Peres-Neto, P.R., Reineking, B., Schröder, B., Schurr, F.M. & Wilson, R. (2007) Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30: 609–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmberg, J., Nummi, P., Pöysä, H. & Sjöberg, K. (1992) Do intruding predators and trap position affect the reliability of catches in activity traps? Hydrobiologia 239: 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (2007) FAO Yearbook of Fishery Statistics: Aquaculture Production 2005. Rome, Italy: FAO Statistics Series 100/2.Google Scholar
Fox, M.G. & Keast, A. (1990) Effects of winterkill on population structure, body size and prey consumption patterns of pumpkinseed in isolated beaver ponds. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 2489–2498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Berthou, E. (2001) Size- and depth-dependent variation in habitat and diet of the common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Aquatic Sciences 63: 466–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, G. & Hero, J.-M. (1999) Potential impacts of introduced fish and fish translocations on Australian amphibians. In: Declines and Disappearances of Australian Frogs, ed. Campbell, A., pp. 131–144. Canberra, Australia: Environment Australia.Google Scholar
Głowaciński, Z. & Rafiński, J., eds (2003) Atlas of the Amphibians and Reptiles of Poland. Warszawa-Kraków, Poland: PAN.Google Scholar
Gosner, K.L. (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16: 183–190.Google Scholar
Griffiths, R.A. (1985) A simple funnel trap for studying newt populations and an evaluation in smooth and palmate newts, Triturus vulgaris and Triturus helveticus. British Journal of Herpetology 1: 5–10.Google Scholar
Hartel, T., Nemes, Sz., Cogalniceanu, D., Öllerer, K., Schweiger, O., Moga, C.I. & Demeter, L. (2007) The effect of fish and aquatic habitat complexity on amphibians. Hydrobiologia 583: 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecnar, S.J. & M'Closkey, R.T. (1997) Patterns of nestedness and species association in a pond-dwelling amphibian fauna. Oikos 80: 371–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horváth, L., Tamás, G. & Seagrave, C. (1992) Carp and Pond Fish Culture. Oxford, UK: Fishing News Books.Google Scholar
IUCN (1997) Fishing for a Living. The Ecology and Economics of Fishponds in Central Europe. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN.Google Scholar
Kestemont, P. (1995) Different systems of carp production and their impacts on the environment. Aquaculture 129: 347–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloskowski, J. (2005) Otter Lutra lutra damage at farmed fisheries in southeastern Poland I: an interview survey. Wildlife Biology 11: 99–104.Google Scholar
Kloskowski, J. (2009) Size-structured effects of common carp on reproduction of pond-breeding amphibians. Hydrobiologia 635: 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurila, A. (1998) Breeding habitat selection and larval performance of two anurans in fresh water rock-pools. Ecography 21: 484–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, P. & Fortin, M.-J. (1989) Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80: 107–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macias, G., Marco, A. & Blaustein, A.R. (2007) Combined exposure to ambient UVB radiation and nitrite negatively affects survival of amphibian early life stages. Science of the Total Environment 385: 55–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manteifel, Y.B. & Reshetnikov, A.N. (2002) Avoidance of noxious tadpole prey by fish and invertebrate predators: adaptivity of a chemical defence may depend on predator feeding habits. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 153: 657–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martyshev, F.G. (1983) Pond Fisheries. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.Google Scholar
McCulloch, C.E. & Searle, S.R. (2001) Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models. NewYork, NY, USA: Wiley.Google Scholar
Meyer, A.H., Schmidt, B.R. & Grossenbacher, K. (1998) Analysis of three amphibian populations with quarter-century long time series. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 265: 523–528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyström, P., Birkedal, L., Dahlberg, C. & Brönmark, C. (2002) The declining spadefoot Pelobates fuscus: calling site choice and conservation. Ecography 25: 488–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Grady, K.T. & Spillett, P.B. (1985) A comparison of the pond culture of carp, Cyprinus carpio L., in Britain and mainland Europe. Journal of Fish Biology 26: 701–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortiz, M.E., Marco, A., Saiz, N. & Lizana, M. (2004) Impact of ammonium nitrate on growth and survival of six European amphibians. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 47: 234–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petranka, J.W., Smith, C.K. & Scott, A.F. (2004) Identifying the minimal demographic unit for monitoring pond-breeding amphibians. Ecological Applications 14: 1065–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resetarits, W.J. Jr & Wilbur, H.M. (1989) Choice of oviposition site by Hyla chrysoscelis: role of predators and competitors. Ecology 70: 220–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schall, R. (1991) Estimation in generalized linear models with random effects. Biometrika 78: 719–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoener, T.W. & Schoener, A. (1983) Distribution of vertebrates on some very small islands. I. Occurrence sequences of individual species. Journal of Animal Ecology 72: 209–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. & Martin, J.-L. (1991) Nestedness of insular avifaunas: simple summary statistics masking complex species patterns. Ornis Fennica 68: 178–192.Google Scholar
Skei, J.K., Dolmen, D., Rønning, L. & Ringsby, T.H. (2006) Habitat use during the aquatic phase of the newts Triturus vulgaris (L.) and T. cristatus (Laurenti) in central Norway: proposition for a conservation and monitoring area. Amphibia–Reptilia 27: 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. & Reay, P. (1991) Cannibalism in teleost fish. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 1: 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G.R., Rettig, J.E., Mittelbach, G.G., Valiulis, J.L. & Schaach, S.R. (1999) The effects of fish on assemblages of amphibians in ponds: a field experiment. Freshwater Biology 41: 829–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snodgrass, J.W., Bryan, A.L. Jr. & Burger, J. (2000) Development of expectations of larval amphibian assemblage structure in southern depression wetlands. Ecological Applications 10: 1219–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szücs, I., Stundi, L. & Váradi, L. (2007) Carp farming in Central and Eastern Europe and a case study in multifunctional aquaculture. In: Species and System Selection for Sustainable Aquaculture, ed. Leung, P.S., Lee, C.-S. & O'Bryan, P.J., pp. 389–413. Ames, IA, USA: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ter Braak, C.J.F. (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ter Braak, C.J.F. & Verdonschot, P.F.M. (1995) Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquatic Sciences 57: 255–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Buskirk, J. (2003) Habitat partitioning in European and North American pond-breeding frogs and toads. Diversity and Distributions 9: 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viertel, B. (1990) Suspension feeding of anuran larvae at low concentrations of Chlorella algae (Amphibia: Anura). Oecologia 85: 167–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vilizzi, L. (1998) Observations on ontogenetic shifts in the diet of 0+ carp, Cyprinus carpio L., from the River Murray, Australia. Folia Zoologica 47: 225–229.Google Scholar
Vos, C.C. & Stumpel, A.H.P. (1995) Comparison of habitat-isolation parameters in relation to fragmented distribution patterns in the tree frog (Hyla arborea). Landscape Ecology 11: 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellborn, G.A., Skelly, D.K. & Werner, E.E. (1996) Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27: 337–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zambrano, L., Perrow, M.R., Macias-Garcia, C. & Aguirre-Hidalgo, V. (1999) Impact of introduced carp (Cyprinus carpio) in subtropical shallow ponds in Central Mexico. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress and Recovery 6: 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kloskowski supplementary material

Appendices.doc

Download Kloskowski supplementary material(File)
File 45.1 KB