Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:29:45.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Forest ecosystem services and biodiversity in contrasting Himalayan forest management systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2013

INGER E. MÅREN ,
KHEM R. BHATTARAI  and
RAM P. CHAUDHARY
INGER E. MÅREN*
Affiliation:
Uni Bjerknes Centre and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, University of Bergen, Allégaten 55, 5007 Bergen, Norway
KHEM R. BHATTARAI
Affiliation:
The National Herbarium and Plant Laboratories, Department of Plant Resources, Nepal
RAM P. CHAUDHARY
Affiliation:
Central Department of Botany, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal
*
*Correspondence: Dr Inger Måren Tel: +47 555 83597 Fax: +47 555 89667 e-mail: inger.maaren@geog.uib.no
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In developing countries, the landscape surrounding agricultural land is important for maintaining biodiversity and providing ecosystem services. Forests provide a full suite of goods and services to subsistence farmers in the Himalayan agro-ecological system. The effects of biomass outtake on woody species richness and composition were analysed in forests under communal and government management. Interviews on forest use and perception of forest condition and ecosystem service delivery were conducted in farmer households bordering the forests. Significantly more woody species were found in the community managed forests. Species richness was negatively correlated with walking distance from the nearest village and increasing levels of anthropogenic disturbance. Community forests were generally less degraded than government managed forests, giving support to common pool resource management. Woody vegetation represented a crucial source of fuelwood, timber, fodder, and edible, aromatic and medicinal plants. Using a multidisciplinary framework to analyse ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service delivery enabled a finer understanding of these complex agro-ecological systems, giving support to evidence-based management and conservation planning for the future.

Keywords

agro-ecological systemsbiodiversitybiomass outtakecommunity forestrygovernment managed forestslegal regimesustainability
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 73 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aase, T.H. & Vetaas, O.R. (2007) Risk management by communal decision in trans-Himalayan farming: Manang valley in central Nepal. Human Ecology 35: 453–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, K.P. (2002) Twenty-four years of Community Forestry in Nepal. International Forest Review 4: 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A. & Gibson, C.C. (1999) Enhancement and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resources management. World Development 27: 629–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A. & Ostrom, E. (2001) Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Political Society 29: 485–514.Google Scholar
Agrawal, A. & Redford, K. (2006) Poverty, development, and biodiversity conservation: shooting in the dark? Wildlife Conservation Society Report, working paper no. 26, WCS Institute, Bronx, NY, USA [www document]. URL http://siteresources.worldbank.org/intpovertynet/resources/agrawal_redford_wp26.pdf Google Scholar
Aryal, A. & Dhungel, S.K. (2009) Species diversity and distribution of bats in Panchase region of Nepal. Conservation and Information Network of South Asia. 1 [www document]. URL http://www.brtf.org.np/picture/pdf/bat%20report.pdf.pdf Google Scholar
Baral, N. & Stern, M.J. (2011) A comparative study of two community-based conservation models in Nepal. Biodiversity and Conservation 20: 2407–2426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baral, N.R., Sah, R.N., Sherpa, D. & Paudyal, A. (2008) Physiographic and geographic aspects of forestry sector. In: Democratization, Governance and Sustainable Development of the Forestry Sector of Nepal. Proceedings of the National Workshop, Kathmandu, ed. Oli, B.N. & Dhungana, S.P., pp. 83–110. Kathmandu, Nepal: Foresters Association.Google Scholar
Baral, S.K. & Katzensteiner, K. (2009) Diversity of vascular plant communities along a disturbance gradient in a central mid-hill community forest of Nepal. Banko Janakari 19: 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwat, S.A., Kushalappa, C.G., Williams, P.H. & Brown, N.D. (2005) The role of informal protected areas in maintaining biodiversity in the Western Ghats of India. Ecology and Society 10: 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwat, S.A., Willis, K.J., Birks, H.J.B. & Whittaker, R.J. (2008) Agroforestry: a refuge for tropical biodiversity? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23: 261–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhattarai, K.R. & Vetaas, O.R. (2003) Variation in plant species richness of different life forms along a subtropical elevation gradient in the Himalayas, east Nepal. Global Ecology and Biogeography 12: 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattarai, K.R. & Vetaas, O.R. (2006) Can Rapoport's rule explain tree species richness along the Himalayan elevation gradient, Nepal? Diversity and Distribution 12: 373–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattarai, K.R., Måren, I.E. & Chaudhary, R.P. (2011) Forest ecosystem services; medicinal plant knowledge of the Panchase region in the Middle Hills of the Nepalese Himalayas. Banko Janakari 21: 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, C.A. (1965) Methods of Soil Analyses. Volume 2. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, C. (2005) The environmental control of plant species density on a Himalayan elevation gradient. Biogeography 32: 999–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, B. (1992) The land, the farmer, and the future. A soil fertility management strategy for Nepal. ICIMOD Occasional Paper No. 21. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CBS (2011) Population Census. Kathmandu, Nepal: Central Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
Chaudhary, R.P. (1998) Biodiversity in Nepal: Status and Conservation. Bangkok, Thailand: Craftsman Press.Google Scholar
Chaudhary, R.P. (2000) Forest conservation and environmental management in Nepal: a review. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 1235–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhary, R.P., Aase, T.H., Vetaas, O.R. & Subedi, B.P., eds (2007) Local Effects of Global Changes in the Himalayas: Manang, Nepal. Nepal and Norway: Tribhuvan University, Nepal and University of Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
Chaudhary, R.P., Subedi, B.P., Vetaas, O.R., Aase, T.H., eds (2002) Vegetation and Society. Their Interaction in the Himalayas. Nepal and Norway: Tribhuvan University, Nepal and University of Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
Christensen, M. & Heilmann-Clausen, J. (2009) Forest biodiversity gradients and the human impact in Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Biodiversity and Conservation 18: 2205–2221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DFRS (1999 a) Forest and Shrub Cover of Nepal 1994. Kathmandu, Nepal: Department of Forest Research and Survey.Google Scholar
DFRS (1999 b) Forest Resources of Nepal (1987–1998). Kathmandu, Nepal: Department of Forest Research and Survey.Google Scholar
DoF (2010) CFUG Database Record. Department of Forest, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
DoF/MFSC (2011) Panchase Protected Forest Management Plan. Department of Forest, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
Eckholm, E. (1976) Losing Ground.New York, NY, USA: WW Norton for the World Watch Institute Google Scholar
Gautam, A.P., Webb, E.L., Shivakoti, G.P. & Zoebisch, M.A. (2003) Land use dynamics and landscape change pattern in a mountain watershed in Nepal. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 99: 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautam, M. & Watanabe, T. (2005) Composition, distribution and diversity of tree species under different management systems in the hill forests of Bharse Village, Gulmi District, Western Nepal. Himalayan Journal of Sciences 3: 69–76.Google Scholar
Gibson, C.C., Williams, J.T. & Ostrom, E. (2004) Local enforcement and better forests. World Development 33: 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmour, D.A. & Fisher, R.J. (1991) villagers, Forests and Foresters: The Philosophy, Process and Practice of Community Forestry in Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: Sahayogi Press.Google Scholar
GON-NPC/UNCTN (2010) Nepal Millennium Development Goals-Progress Report 2010. Government of Nepal, National Planning Commission/United Nations Country Team of Nepal [www document]. URL http://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/upload/Nepal/Nepal_MDG_2010.pdf Google Scholar
Grime, J.P. (1973) Control of species richness in herbaceous vegetation. Journal of Environmental Management 1: 151–167.Google Scholar
Hill, M.O. & Gauch, H.G. (1980) Detrended correspondence analysis. An improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42: 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, J.D. (1987) The theory of Himalayan environmental degradation: its validity and application challenged. Mountain Research and Development 7: 189–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, J.D. (2004) Himalayan perceptions: environmental change and the well-being of mountain peoples. Himalayan Journal of Science 2: 17–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, J.D. & Messerli, B. (1989) The Himalayan Dilemma: Reconciling Development and Conservation. London, UK and New York, NY, USA: Routledge: 295 pp.Google Scholar
Kareiva, P. & Marvier, M. (2007) Conservation for the people. Scientific American 297: 50–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koirala, R.A. (1998) Botanical diversity within the project area of Machhapuchhre Development Organization, Bhadaure/Tamagi, VDC Kaski District. A baseline study for Machhapuchhre Development Organization (MDO), Bhadaure/Tamagi, VDC Kaski District, Nepal. Report. MDO, Pokhara, Nepal.Google Scholar
Kumar, S. & Kant, S. (2005) Bureaucracy and new management paradigms: modeling forester’ perceptions regarding community based forest management in India. Forest Policy and Economics 7: 651–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahat, T.B.S., Griffin, D.M. & Shepherd, K.R. (1986) Human impact on some forests of the Middle Hills of Nepal: 1. Forestry in the context of the traditional resources of the state. Mountain Research and Development 6: 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Måren, I.E. & Vetaas, O.R. (2007) Does regulated land-use allow regeneration of keystone forest species in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Central Himalaya? Mountain Research and Development 27: 345–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MDO (2006) Masterplan for Macchhapuchhre Development Organization. Unpublished report. MDO, Kaski, Nepal.Google Scholar
MFSC/ADB/FINNIDA (1988) Master Plan for Forestry Sector Nepal. Report. Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Asian Development Bank, and Finnish International Development Agency, Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Moench, M. & Bandyopadhyay, J. (1986) People-forest interactions: a neglected parameter in Himalayan forest management. Mountain Research and Development 6: 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagendra, H. (2007) Drivers of reforestation in human-dominated forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104: 15218–15223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagendra, H. & Ostrom, E. (2011) The challenge of forest diagnostics. Ecology and Society 16: 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagendra, H., Karmacharya, M. & Karna, B. (2005) Evaluating forest management in Nepal: views across space and time. Ecology and Society 10: 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ormsby, A.A. & Bhagwhat, S.A. (2010) Sacred forests of India: a strong tradition of community-based natural resource management. Environmental Conservation 37: 320–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: the Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C.B., Norgaard, R.B. & Policansky, D. (1999) Revisiting the commons: local lessons, learned global challenges. Science 284: 278–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrings, C., Duraiappah, A., Larigauderie, A. & Mooney, H. (2011) The biodiversity and ecosystem services science-policy interface. Science 331: 1139–1140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pilbeam, C.J., Tripathi, B.P., Sherchan, D.P., Gregory, P.J. & Gaunt, J. (2000) Nitrogen balances for households in the mid-hills of Nepal. Agriculture, Ecology and Environment 97: 61–72.Google Scholar
Polunin, O. & Stainton, A. (1984) Flowers of the Himalaya. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Price, M.F., Gratzer, G., Duguma, L.A., Kholer, T., Maselli, D. & Romeo, R. (2011) Mountain Forests in a Changing World. Realizing Values, Addressing Challenges. Rome, Italy: FAO/MPS and SDC.Google Scholar
R 4 Development Core Team (2010) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Saxena, A.K., Singh, S.P. & Singh, J.S. (1984) Population structure of forests of Kumaun Himalaya implications for management. Journal of Environmental Management 19: 307–324.Google Scholar
Shakya, P.R. (1985) Phytogeography and ecology of Nepalese rhododendrons. In: Nepal: Nature's Paradise, ed. Majupuria TC, T.C., pp. 181–191. Bangkok, Thailand. White Lotus.Google Scholar
Sharma, A.J. (2009) Impact of community forestry on income distribution in Nepal. PhD thesis, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
Sharma, R.K. & Acharya, B.R. (2004) Approach to promoting decentralized land management in Nepal. 3rd FIG Regional Conference Jakarta, Indonesia, T4.3 [www document]. URL http://www.fig.net/pub/jakarta/papers/ts_04/ts_04_3_sharma_acharya.pdf Google Scholar
Shrestha, U.B., Shrestha, S., Chaudhary, P. & Chaudhary, R.P. (2010) How representative is the protective areas system of Nepal? Mountain Research and Development 30: 282–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S.P. (1998) Chronic disturbance, a principal cause of environmental degradation in developing countries. Environmental Conservation 25: 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, J.S. & Singh, S.P. (1992) Forests of the Himalaya. Structure, Functioning and Impact of Man. Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital, India/Delhi, India: Fine Art Press.Google Scholar
Stainton, J.D.A. (1972) Forests of Nepal. London, UK: John Murray Ltd.Google Scholar
Stainton, A. (1988) Flowers of the Himalaya. A Supplement. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Subedi, A., Chaudhary, R.P., Vermeulen, J.J. & Gravendeel, B. (2011) A new species of Panisea (Orchidaceae) from central Nepal. Nordic Journal of Botany 29: 361–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subedi, A., Subedi, N. & Chaudhary, R.P. (2007) Panchase forest: an extraordinary place for wild orchids in Nepal. Pleione 1: 23–31.Google Scholar
Subedi, B.P. (2006) Linking Plant-Based Enterprises and Local Communities to Biodiversity Conservation in Nepal Himalaya. New Dehli, India: Adroit Publishers.Google Scholar
ter Braak, C.J.F. (1987) Ordination. In: Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology, Jongman, R.H.G., ter Braak, C.J.F. & Tongeren, O.F.R., pp. 91–173. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Pudoca.Google Scholar
Thapa, B., Walker, R.D. & Sinclair, F.L. (1997) Indigenous knowledge of the feeding value of tree fooder. Animal Feed Science and Technology 67: 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thapa, G.B. (1996) Land use, land management and environment in a subsistence mountain economy in Nepal. Agriculture, Ecology and Environment 57: 57–71.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. & Warburton, M. (1985) Uncertainty on a Himalayan scale. Mountain Research and Development 5: 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNDP Nepal (2008) United Nations Development Programme Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
Willis, K.J. & Bhagwat, S.A. (2009) Biodiversity and climate change. Science 326: 806–807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Maren Supplementary Materials

Appendix

Download Maren Supplementary Materials(File)
File 4 MB
Supplementary material: Image

Maren Suppelementary Materials

Image

Download Maren Suppelementary Materials(Image)
Image 7.7 MB
Supplementary material: Image

Maren Supplementary Materials

Image

Download Maren Supplementary Materials(Image)
Image 103 KB