Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:34:57.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new mechanism for science-policy transfer and biodiversity governance?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

JORGE M. SOBERON  and
JOSE K. SARUKHAN
JORGE M. SOBERON*
Affiliation:
Biodiversity Research Center and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Dyche Hall, 1345 Jayhawk Boulevard, Lawrence, Kansas 66045-7561, USA Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO), Periférico-Insurgentes 4903, Tlalpan 14010, México
JOSE K. SARUKHAN
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apdo Postal 70-275, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, México Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO), Periférico-Insurgentes 4903, Tlalpan 14010, México
*
*Correspondence: Professor Jorge Soberon e-mail: jsoberon@ku.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

New initiatives are being proposed to create knowledge-transfer mechanisms between biodiversity science and so-called ‘decision makers’ that are apparently ignoring some of the significant differences to which biodiversity governance is subject at different scales. Shifting scales seriously change the rules of knowledge transfer; some implications of this are explored. Appropriate scope and focus are vital for international initiatives. There is no substitute for the full development of local capacities, and the multinational lending agencies interested in the conservation of biodiversity, the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals, and others should support such national efforts and establish regional training facilities to help generate the human and basic institutional capacities needed.

Type
Comment
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 265 - 267
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, A. (1995) Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change 26: 413–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balmford, A., Crane, P., Dobson, A., Green, R.E. & Mace, G. (2005) The 2010 challenge: data availability, information needs and extraterrestrial insights. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360: 221–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bawa, K.S. & Gadgil, M. (2003) Ecosystem services in subsistence economies and conservation of biodiversity. In: Nature's Services. Social Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, ed. Daily, G. C., pp. 295–310. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Becker, D.C. & Ghimire, K. (2003) Synergy between traditional knowledge and conservation science supports forest preservation in Ecuador. Conservation Ecology 8 (1): [www document]. URL http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol8/iss1/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F. (2004) Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology 18 (3): 621–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cash, D.W., Clark, W.C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N.M., Eckley, N., Guston, D.H., Jager, J. & Mitchell, R.B. (2003) Science and technology for sustainable development special feature: knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100 (14): 8086–8091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, D.W. & Gillespie, R. (2000) Locality in the history of science: colonial science, technoscience and indigenous knowledge. Osiris 15 (2nd series): 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, G.S., Cumming, D.H.M. & Redman, C. (2006) Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: causes, consequences, and solutions. Ecology and Society 11 (1): 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P. & Norberg, J. (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 30: 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadgil, M. (1995) Prudence and profligacy: a human ecological perspective. In: The Economics and Ecology of Biodiversity Decline, ed. Swanson, T., pp. 99–110. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herlihy, P. & Leake, A.P. (1997) Participatory research mapping of indigenous lands in the Honduran Mosquitia. In: Demographic Diversity and Change in the Central American Isthmus, ed. Pebley, A.R. & Rosero Bixby, L., pp. 707–736. Santa Monica, CA, USA: RAND.Google Scholar
Levin, S.A. (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73 (6): 1943–1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loreau, M., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Arroyo, M.T.K., Babin, D., Barbault, R., Donoghue, M., Gadgil, M., Hauser, C., Heip, C., Larigauderie, A., Ma, K., Mace, G., Mooney, H.A., Perrings, C., Raven, P., Sarukhán, J., Schei, P., Scholes, R.J. & Watson, R.T. (2006) Diversity without representation. Nature 442: 245–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ludwig, J. & Stafford Smith, M. (2005) Intrepreting and correcting cross-scale mismatches in resilience analysis: a procedure and examples from Australia's rangelands. Ecology and Society 10 (2): 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maffi, L. (2005) Linguistic, cultural and biological diversity. Annual Review of Anthropology 29: 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, L., Folke, C. & Olsson, P. (2007) Enhancing ecosytem management through social-ecological inventories: lessons from Kristianstads Vattenrike, Sweden. Environmental Conservation 34 (2): 140–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G.F. & Klopper, R. (2002) A southern perspective on the All Species project and the global taxonomy imperative. Taxon 51: 359–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soberón, J. (2004) Translating life's diversity: can scientists and policymakers learn to communicate better? Environment 46 (7): 10–20.Google Scholar
Storch, D., Marquet, P.A. & Brown, J.H. (2007) Scaling Biodiversity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, T. (1997) Global Action for Biodiversity. London, UK: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
Toledo, V.M. (2001) Indigenous peoples, and biodiversity. In: Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, ed. Levin, S., pp. 1181–1203. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
UNEP (2009) Preliminary gap analysis for the purpose of facilitating the discussions on how to strengthen the science- policy interface. UNEP/GC.25/INF30 [www document]. www.unep.org/gc/gcss-x/download.asp?ID=1010Google Scholar
Walsh, M. (2005) Will indigenous languages survive? Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiens, J. A. (1989) Spatial scaling in Ecology. Functional Ecology 3: 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar