Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:23:00.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevalence and economic value of feral swine damage to native habitat in three Florida state parks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2003

Richard M. Engeman
Affiliation:
National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521-2154, USA
Henry T. Smith
Affiliation:
Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Florida Park Service, 13798 SE Federal Highway, Hobe Sound, FL 33455, USA
Stephanie A. Shwiff
Affiliation:
National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521-2154, USA
Bernice Constantin
Affiliation:
USDA/APHIS/WS, 2820 East University Avenue, Gainesville, FL 32641, USA
John Woolard
Affiliation:
USDA/APHIS/WS, 2820 East University Avenue, Gainesville, FL 32641, USA
Mark Nelson
Affiliation:
Jonathan Dickinson State Park, 16450 SE Federal Highway, Hobe Sound, FL 33455, USA
Daniel Griffin
Affiliation:
Savannas Preserve State Park, 9551 Gumbo Limbo Lane, Jensen Beach, FL 34957, USA

Abstract

Feral swine (Sus scrofa) adversely affect the environment in many of the places where they have been introduced. Such is the case in Florida, but quantification and economic evaluation of the damage can provide objective bases for developing strategies to protect habitats. Swine damage to native wet pine-flatwoods at three state parks in Florida was monitored from winter 2002 to winter 2003. Economic valuations of damage were based on the US dollar amounts that wetland regulators have allowed permit applicants to spend in attempts to replace lost resources. The parks had different swine management histories and the damage patterns differed among them over time. Swine were intensively removed in 2000 from the first park, and it initially had the lowest habitat damage at 1.3%, but as a result of natural and artificial population growth this damage rose to 5.4% by the conclusion of the study, and was valued at US$ 19 193–36 498 ha−1. The second park had no history of swine harvest and, over the monitoring period, damage escalated from 2.6%–6.4%, with an associated value of US$ 22 747–43 257 ha−1. Swine were managed as game animals in the third park prior to its inclusion into the state parks system in 2000. Within this park, the proportion of area damaged decreased from 4.3%–1.5%, valued at US$ 5 331–10 138 ha−1. This decrease may be a result of human activities associated with development of the park's infrastructure causing dispersal of animals conditioned to avoid humans by hunting. Damage was highly scattered in each park, as evidenced by a much higher proportion of sampling sites showing damage than the actual proportion of land area damaged. The dispersed nature of small amounts of damage would increase the effort required to recover habitat and thus damage value estimates are probably conservative. It was also impossible to incorporate values for such contingencies as swine impact to state and federally listed endangered plants in the parks, some of which are found nowhere else in the world.

Type
Paper
Copyright
© 2003 Foundation for Environmental Conservation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)