Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:39:47.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Property rights in protected areas: obstacles to community involvement as a solution in Thailand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2009

Peter Vandergeest
Peter Vandergeest*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, York University, 4700 Keele Street, North York, Ontario M3J1P3, Canada
*
* Dr Peter Vandergeest Tel: +1 416 736 2100 ext. 60301; e-mail: pvander@yorku.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Conflicts between local people and managers of protected areas (PAs) have often undermined conservation goals in Asia. Since the 1970s, conservation planners have tried to address these problems by incorporating rural development into PA planning. More recently, many conservationists have argued for increasing community involvement in PA management, and for allowing traditional resource uses inside PAs. Based on research in Thailand I make three arguments regarding obstacles to implementing the new approach.

In Thailand, laws governing Wildlife Sanctuaries and National Parks enacted in the early 1960s were premised on the idea that human use and nature preservation were incompatible. Rapid expansion of these PAs in recent years has produced endemic conflict with rural people claiming resources inside PAs. To address this problem, the Thai Royal Forestry Department has cooperated with NGOs providing development assistance to rural people living in buffer zones outside of some PAs. I argue that this approach has met limited success because the main source of conflict is not poverty but claims on resources inside PAs.

The second argument is that the Forestry Department has resisted changes to laws making local use inside PAs illegal because these laws are important for consolidating the Department's control over territory and in justifying increasing budgetary allocations. In addition, by redefining itself as an organization devoted to strict defence of forests, the Department has obtained the support of many urban environmentalists. The third argument is that the community forest approach taken by a recent draft Community Forest Bill is an important first step in that it implicitly recognizes community property. At the same time, this approach will also fail to address key problems because it is based on a notion of the traditional village, and does not allow for the commercial nature of rural forest use or the household-based nature of forest tenure.

I suggest that the new expansion of PAs be halted, that land claimed by rural households be taken out of PAs, and that the government recognize community management rights in areas that remain classified as protected. More generally, the goals of conservation would be better achieved by replacing an approach based on the rapid expansion of PAs with one promoting conservation outside PAs.

Keywords

Thailandprotected areascommunity managementforestpropertyresource rights
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 259 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, A.B., ed. (1962) First World Conference on National Parks. Washington, DC: United States National Parks Service, United States Department of the Interior: 471 pp.Google Scholar
Adams, W.M. (1990) Green Development: Environment and Sustainability in the Third World. London: Routledge: 255 pp.Google Scholar
Albers, H. (1994) People and Parks: economic management of Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. Presented at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Workshop, Boulder, Colorado, 5–6 May 1994: 31pp.Google Scholar
Alford, D. (1992) Streamflow and sediment transport from mountain watersheds of the Chao Phraya Basin, northern Thailand. Mountain Research and Development 12(3): 257–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Committee (1935) The London Convention for the Protection of African Fauna and Flora. Special publication of the American Committee for International Wildlife Protection Number 6 (League of Nations Registration Number 3995): 32 pp.Google Scholar
Anon. (1992) Cremation Memorial for Dr Boonsong Lekagul. Bangkok: Office of the Palace: 423 pp.Google Scholar
Anon. (1994) Duen Paa. Phu Jut Kaan Daily (Southern Edition) 24 February: p. 7.Google Scholar
Anon. (1995) Montri stands up for Huay Kha Khaeng chief. Bangkok Post 18 November: p. 6.Google Scholar
Anon. (1996) Panel to draft new community forest law. Bangkok Post 27 February: p. 6.Google Scholar
Badshah, M.A. & Bhadran, C.A.R. (1962) National Parks: their principlesand purposes. In: First World Conference on National Parks, ed. Adams, A.B. pp. 23–34. Washington, DC: United States National Parks Service, United States Department of the Interior.Google Scholar
Cardich, E., ed. (1985) Nahuel Huapi Action Plan for the protected areas of the Neotropical Realm. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN: 23 pp.Google Scholar
Chantawong, M., Katesombun, B., Koohacharoen, O., Leungaramsri, P., Malapetch, P., Palsarnpanichkul, D., Thungsuro, K. & Rajesh, N. (1992) People and the forests of Thailand: community forests. In: The Future of People and Forests in Thailand After the Logging Ban, ed. Leungaramsri, P. & Rajesh, N., pp. 151–96. Bangkok: Project for Ecological Recovery.Google Scholar
Chettamart, S. (1985) Preparing a Management Plan for Khao Yai Park: the process involved and the lessons learned. In: Conserving Asia's Natural Heritage: The Planning and Management of Protected Areas in the Indo-malayan Realm, ed. Thorsell, J., pp. 162–5. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Dentan, R.K. (1968) Some problems in determining the conservation needs of the hill peoples of South East Asia. In: Conservation in Tropical South East Asia, ed. Talbot, L.M. & Talbot, M.H., pp. 89–91. Morges, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Dove, M. (1983) Theories of swidden agriculture, and the political economy of ignorance. Agroforestry Systems 1: 85–99.Google Scholar
Dove, M. (1993) A revisionist view of deforestation and development. ‘Environmental Conservation 20(1): 17–24.Google Scholar
Elliot, H., ed. (1974) Second World Conference on National Parks. Morges, Switzerland: IUCN: 504 pp.Google Scholar
Fatuity of Forestry (1987) Assessment of National Parks, Wildlife Sanctuaries, and Other Preserves Development in Thailand. Bangkok: Kasetsart University Faculty of Forestry, with the Royal Forestry Department and Office of the National Environment Board: 138 pp.Google Scholar
Ganjanapan, A. (1996) State conservation policy and the complexity of local control of forest land in Northern Thailand. Unpublished paper, Meetings of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Berkeley, California, 6 June 1996: 21 pp.Google Scholar
Ghimire, K.B. (1991) Parks and people: livelihood issues in National Parks management in Thailand and Madagascar. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development Discussion Paper 29: 39 pp.Google Scholar
Ghimire, K.B. (1994) Parks and people: livelihood issues in National Parks management in Thailand and Madagascar. Development and Change 25: 195–229.Google Scholar
Gill, T. (1968) The human factor: mis-use of land in Southeast Asia. In: Conservation in Tropical South East Asia, ed. Talbot, L.M. & Talbot, M.H., pp. 87–8. Morges, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Government of Thailand (annual) Statistical Yearbook of Thailand. Bangkok: National Statistical Office.Google Scholar
Guha, R. (1989) Radical American cnvironmentalism and wilderness preservation: a Third World critique. Environmental Ethics 11: 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harroy, J. (1974) A century of growth in the National Park concept throughout the world, In: Second World Conference on National Parks, ed. Elliot, H., pp. 24–31. Morges, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Hubback, T.R. (1905) Elephant and Seladang Hunting in the Federated Malay States. London: Rowland Ward, Limited: 289 pp.Google Scholar
IUCN (1996) IUCN Working Group on community involvement in forest management: an initiative to influence the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Forests. Presented at the 1996 Meetings of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Berkeley, California, 6 June: 5 pp.Google Scholar
Kanjanavanit, O. (1996) Forests’ bill. The Nation 30 June: p. A4.Google Scholar
Kropp, G. (1971) Wildlife and National Park Legislation in Asia. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization: 52 pp.Google Scholar
Lekagul, B. (1962) The cultural value of National Parks. In: First World Conference on National Parks, ed. Adams, A.B., pp. 129–32. Washington, DC: United States National Parks Service, United States Department of the Interior.Google Scholar
Lekagul, B. & McNeely, J.A. (1977) Mammals of Thailand. Bangkok: Association for the Conservation of Wildlife: 758 pp.Google Scholar
Leungaramsri, P. & Rajesh, N. (1992) The Future of People and Forests in Thailand After the Logging Ban. Bangkok: Project for Ecological Recovery: 202 pp.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, J.M. (1988) The Empire of Nature: Hunting, Conservation and British Imperialism. Manchester: Manchester University Press: 340 pp.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, J., MacKinnon, K., Child, G. & Thorsell, J. (1986) Managing Protected Areas in the Tropics. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN: 295 pp.Google Scholar
McNeely, J.A. (1989) Protected areas and human ecology: how National Parks can contribute to sustaining societies of the twenty-first century. In: Conservation for the Twenty-first Century, ed. Western, D. & Pearl, M.C., pp. 50–157. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McNeely, J.A. (1994) Lessons from the past: forests and biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 3: 3–20.Google Scholar
McNeely, J.A., Harrison, J. & Dingwall, P., cds. (1994) Protecting Nature: Regional Reviews of Protected Areas. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN: 402 pp.Google Scholar
McNeely, J.A. & Miller, K., eds. (1984) National Parks, Conservation, and Development: The Role of Protected Areas in Sustaining Society. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press: 825 pp.Google Scholar
McNeely, J.A. & Wachtel, P.S. (1991) Soul of the Tiger: Searching for Nature's Answers in Southeast Asia. Singapore: Oxford University Press: 390 pp.Google Scholar
MIDAS Agronomics Company (1993) Draft final report, Conservation Forest Area: Protection, Management and Development Project. Bangkok (available at the Royal Forestry Department library).Google Scholar
Moore, A. (1988) National Parks Planning: A Manual with Annotated Examples. Rome: FAO Conservation Guide 17: 42 pp.Google Scholar
Moseley, P. (1976) A Manual for National Parks Planning with Annotated Examples. Rome: FAO: 42 pp.Google Scholar
Nepal, S.K. & Weber, K. (1994) A buffer zone for biodiversity conservation: viability of the concept in Nepal's Royal Chitwan National Park. Environmental Conservation 21(4): 333–41.Google Scholar
Olindo, P.M. (1974) Park values, changes, and problems in developing countries. In: Second World Conference on National Parks, ed. Elliot, H., pp. 52–62. Morges, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Peluso, N.L. (1993) Coercing conservation: the politics of state resource control. Global Environmental Change 3: 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peluso, N.L., Vandergeest, P. & Potter, L. (1995) Social aspects of forestry in Southeast Asia. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 26(1): 196–218.Google Scholar
Royal Forestry Department (1978–94) Forestry Statistics of Thailand. Bangkok: Data Center, Information Office, Royal Forestry Department (published annually): pp. var.Google Scholar
Royal Forestry Department (1993 a) Rai Ngan Prajum Pii 2536. Bangkok: Royal Forestry Department: 102 pp.Google Scholar
Royal Forestry Department (1993 b) Thai Forestry Sector Master Plan: Subsectoral Plan for People and Forest Environment (Volume 5). Bangkok: Royal Forestry Department: 192 pp.Google Scholar
Royal Forestry Department (no date) Khao Yai National Park Management Plan 1987–1991. Bangkok: Royal Forestry Department: 199 pp.Google Scholar
Ruhle, G. (1964) Advisory report on a National Park system for Thailand. New York: American Committee for International Wild Life Protection, Special Publication No 17: 24 pp.Google Scholar
Sabhasri, S. (1968) Preliminary watershed management research in northern Thailand. In: Conservation in Tropical South East Asia, ed. Talbot, L.M. & Talbot, M.H., pp. 111–14. Morges, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Scott, J.C. (1985) Weapons of the Weak. New Haven: Yale University Press: 389 pp.Google Scholar
Spencer, J.E. (1966) Shifting Cultivation in Southeastern Asia. Berkeley: University of California Press: 247 pp.Google Scholar
Stott, P. (1991) Muang and pa: elite view of nature in a changing Thailand. In: Thai Constructions of Knowledge, ed. Chitakasem, M. & Turton, A., pp. 142–54. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
Sukin, K. (1996) Conflict over protection of forests. The Nation 4 July: p. A4.Google Scholar
Suvanakorn, P. & Dobias, R. (1985) Using economic incentives to improveParks protection: a case study from Thailand. In: Conserving Asia's Natural Heritage: The Planning and Management of Protected Areas in the Indomalayan Realm, ed. Thorsell, J., pp. 177–82. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Talbot, L.M. & Talbot, M.H., eds. (1968) Conservation in Tropical South East Asia. Morges, Switzerland: IUCN: 550 pp.Google Scholar
Thak, C. (1979) Thailand: The Politics of Despotic Paternalism. Bangkok: Social Science Association of Thailand: 357 pp.Google Scholar
Vandergeest, P. (1996) Mapping nature: territorialization of forest rights in Thailand. Society and Natural Resources 9(2): 159–75.Google Scholar
Vandergeest, P. & Peluso, N. (1995) Territorialization and state power in Thailand. Theory and Society 24: 385–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Osten, R. (1972) World National Parks: Progress and Opportunities. Brussels: Hayez: 392 pp.Google Scholar
Wells, M. & Brandon, K. (1992) People and Parks: Linking Protected Area Management with Local Communities. Washington, DC: The World Bank/WWF/USAID: 99 pp.Google Scholar
West, P.C. (1991) Introduction. In: Resident Peoples and National Parks, ed. West, P.C. & Brechin, S.R., pp. xv–xxiv. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press: 443 pp.Google Scholar
Wharton, C.H. (1966) Man, fire and wild cattle in North Cambodia. In: Proceedings, Fifth Annual Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference Tallahassee, Florida, March 24–25,1966, pp. 23–65. Tallahassee, Florida: Tall Timbers Research Station.Google Scholar
Wharton, C.H. (1968) Man, fire and wild cattle in Southeast Asia. In: Proceedings, Annual Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference, Tallahassee, Florida, March 14–15, 1968, pp. 107–67. Tallahassee, Florida: Tall Timbers Research Station.Google Scholar