Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:49:32.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why conserve marine environments?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2008

SUSAN OWENS
SUSAN OWENS*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge CB2 3EN, UK Tel: +44 1223 333399 e-mail: seo1000@cam.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Damage to marine environments attracts increasing attention and alarm, instilling in many observers a sense of urgency in promoting preventive and restorative measures (see for example Pauly & Maclean 2003; Roberts 2003; RCEP [Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution] 2004; MEA [Millennium Ecosystem Assessment] 2005). Such concerns have had effect. As noted in a recent British policy document, ‘countries all over the world are reviewing the way they manage their marine environment’ (Defra [Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs] 2007, p. 1). In much that has been said and written on this subject it is a basic premise that marine ecosystems and biodiversity ought to be protected, at least to some degree. This implies a moral injunction: that it is wrong to allow these systems to be degraded or destroyed, and right to limit human activities that generate harmful impacts. The interesting and fundamental question is why. What Norton (1982, p. 319) calls an ‘intuitive ethic’ for conservation might be invoked, but in a world of conflicting priorities it will often be necessary to support intuition with evidence and argument. Answers to the question, ‘why conserve?’ are important because the reasons offered for defending marine environments have a bearing on the extent to which conservation can be justified, and on the kinds of policies that might ensue. Although different premises will sometimes point to broadly similar actions, there are circumstances in which the underlying rationales for conservation will have divergent policy implications.

Type
Comment
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 1 - 4
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banner, M. (1999) Christian Ethics and Contemporary Moral Problems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, B. (1990) Political Argument: a Reissue with a New Introduction, New York, USA: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Clover, C. (2004) The End of the Line: How Overfishing is Changing the World and What We Eat. London, UK: Ebury Press.Google Scholar
Culliney, J.L. (1976) The Forests of the Sea: Life and Death on the Continental Shelf. San Francisco, CA, USA: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
Defra (2007) A Sea Change: A Marine Bill White Paper. Cm 7047. London, UK: Defra.Google Scholar
Elliot, R. (1997) Faking Nature: The Ethics of Environmental Restoration. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foster, J. (1997) Valuing Nature: Economics, Ethics and Environment. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R. (1992) Green Political Theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. (1995) Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargrove, E. (1992) Weak anthropocentric intrinsic value. In: After Earth Day: Continuing the Conservation Effort, ed. Oelschlaeger, M., pp. 141–169. Denton, Texas, USA: University of North Texas Press.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. & McPherson, M. (1993) Taking ethics seriously: economics and contemporary moral philosophy. Journal of Economic Literature 31: 671–731.Google Scholar
Holland, A. (1997) Substitutability: or, why strong sustainability is weak and absurdly strong sustainability is not absurd. In: Valuing Nature: Economics, Ethics and Environment, ed. Foster, J., 119–134. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnson, L. (1991) A Morally Deep World: Essays on Moral Significance and Environmental Ethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCauley, D.J. (2006) Selling out on nature. Nature 443: 27–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MEA (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (1982) Environmental ethics and the rights of future generations. Environmental Ethics 4: 319–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, J. (1993) Ecology, Policy and Politics: Human Well-Being and the Natural World. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
O'Neill, J. (1998) The Market: Ethics, Knowledge and Politics. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, O. (1996) Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, O. (1997) Environmental values, anthropocentrism and speciesism. Environmental Values 6 (2): 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, S. & Cowell, R. (2002) Land and Limits: Interpreting Sustainability in the Planning Process. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Partridge, E. (1984) Nature as a moral resource. Environmental Ethics 4: 175–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauly, D. & Maclean, J. (2003) In a Perfect Ocean: the State of Fisheries and Ecosystems in the North Atlantic Ocean. London, UK: Island Press.Google Scholar
RCEP (2004) Turning the Tide: Addressing the Impacts of Fisheries on the Marine Environment. Twenty-fifth Report, Cm 6392. London, UK: TSO.Google Scholar
Roberts, C.M. (2003) Our shifting perspective on the oceans. Oryx 37 (2): 166–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagoff, M. (1988) The Economy of the Earth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schön, D.A. & Rein, M. (1994) Frame Reflection: Towards the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York, USA: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. (1986) Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar