Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:04:33.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4. Development of the complement-fixation test Mackie TJ, Finkelstein MH. J Hyg 1930; 30: 1–24

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2005

TIM WREGHITT
Affiliation:
Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK (tim.wreghitt@addenbrookes.nhs.uk)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Diagnostic microbiology, first by the visualization of organisms followed by culture of pathogenic organisms, developed at the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century. The detection of specific antibody as a means of diagnosing infection followed. One of the most enduring of these antibody assays has been the complement-fixation test, which is still in use 40 years after its development by Bradstreet and Taylor in 1962 [1]. Despite the development of more sensitive assays such as RIA and ELISA, the serological diagnosis of many respiratory infections is still often achieved by means of the complement-fixation test. Some of these pathogens such as influenza viruses are also diagnosed by culture although obtaining acute phase specimens for culture is problematic. Other organisms such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Coxiella burnetii, although cultivable are seldom diagnosed by this means because most diagnostic laboratories are not able to perform culture routinely. Diagnosis of these treatable infections is usually made by use of the complement-fixation test.

Type
Section 2 Microbiological methods
Copyright
2005 Cambridge University Press
Supplementary material: PDF

HYG centenary supplementary article 4

COMPLEMENT-FIXATION BY THE INTERACTION OF NORMAL SEltUM AND BACTERIAL SUSPENSIONS A CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF NATURAL IMMUNITY PHENOMENA.

Download HYG centenary supplementary article 4(PDF)
PDF 1.4 MB