Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:35:23.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adverse reactions in cattle after vaccination with lapinized rinderpest virus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

G. R. Scott
G. R. Scott
Affiliation:
Veterinary Research Laboratory, Kabete, Kenya
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A survey embracing all cattle vaccinated in Kenya with lapinized rinderpest virus between 1 January 1954 and 30 June 1956 revealed an over-all incidence rate of adverse reactions of 0·09 %. The real incidence rate approached 3 per 1000 cattle because only susceptible cattle were at risk. Four types of reactions were recognized. The most serious, because of the attendant high case mortality rate, was aggravation of latent protozoal infections. The commonest reactions were rinderpest-like without serious sequelae except in pregnant cows, many of which aborted. Transient spermatolysis was observed in six vaccinated bulls and anaphylaxis was recorded rarely.

The incidence of rinderpest-like reactions was primarily influenced by the innate resistance of the cattle. The viral strains recovered from reacting cattle were genotypically unchanged.

I am grateful to Mr J. W. Macaulay, B.Sc., F.R.C.V.S., D.V.S.M., Chief Veterinary Research Officer, Kabete, Kenya, for his encouragement, advice and counsel. This paper is published by permission of the Director of Veterinary Services, Kenya.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 61 , Issue 2 , June 1963 , pp. 193 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

References

Anon. (1955). Kenya Agricultural Census 1954. Nairobi: E. A. Statistical Department.Google Scholar
Brotherston, J. G. (1951 a). Lapinized rinderpest virus and a vaccine: some observations in East Africa. I. Laboratory experiments. J. comp. Path. 61, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brotherston, J. G. (1951 b). Lapinized rinderpest virus and a vaccine: some observations in East Africa. II. Field trials with lapinized vaccine. J. comp. Path. 61, 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C. W., Scott, G. R. & Brotherston, J. G. (1955). Lapinized rinderpest vaccine: post-inoculation reactions in high-grade Guernsey cattle. Vet. Rec. 67, 467.Google Scholar
Burnet, F. M. (1955). Principles of Animal Virology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cornell, R. L. & Evans, S. A. (1937). On the value and limitations of tissue vaccines against rinderpest. J. comp. Path. 50, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daubney, R. (1949 a). Rep. vet. Dep. Kenya 1947, p. 5.Google Scholar
Daubney, R. (1949 b). Goat-adapted virus. In Rinderpest Vaccines, p. 6, ed. Kesteven, K. V. L.. Washington: F.A.O.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. T. (1928). Rinderpest: active immunization by means of the serum simultaneous method; goat virus. Agric. J. India, 23, 185.Google Scholar
Henning, M. W. (1949). Animal Diseases in South Africa, 2nd edn. South Africa: Central News Agency.Google Scholar
Koch, R. (1897). Rinderpest reports. Agric. J.C.G.H. 10, 216.Google Scholar
Minett, F. C. (1940). Rep. imp. Inst. vet. Res. Muktesar 1939–40.Google Scholar
Mornet, P. (1948). Schema epizootologique de la peste bovine en Afrique Occidentale Française. Bull. Serv. elev. A. O. F. 1, 7.Google Scholar
Mornet, P., Gilbert, Y., Orue, J. & Thiery, G. (1955). Nouvelles recherches sur le virus-vaccin bovipestique lapinisé. Rev. Elev. 8, 297.Google Scholar
Nakamura, J., Fukusho, K. & Kuroda, S. (1943). Rinderpest: laboratory experiments on immunization of Chosen cattle by simultaneous inoculation with immune serum and rabbit virus. Jap. J. vet. Sci. 5, 474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramon, G. (1956). Porteurs et vecteurs de germes microbiens. Bull. Off. int. Epiz., 45, 8.Google Scholar
Seifman, . (1866). Memorandum upon the cattle disease. In: Third Cattle Plague Report p. 230. London: H.M.S.O..Google Scholar
Smith, T. (1934). Parasitism and Disease. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Varnell, G. & Pritchard, W. (1866). On the treatment of the cattle plague. In Third Cattle Plague Report, p. 202. London: H.M.S.O..Google Scholar
Waddington, F. G. (1945). An experiment to test infectivity of cattle which are reacting to K.A.G. virus. Vet. Rec. 57, 479.Google Scholar