Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:24:41.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alkali-dissolved diphtheria toxoid-antitoxin floccules adsorbed on aluminium carriers. Preparation, and immunity experiments in animals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. H. Mason  and
Mary Robinson
J. H. Mason
Affiliation:
South African Institute for Medical Research, Johannesburg
Mary Robinson
Affiliation:
South African Institute for Medical Research, Johannesburg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Since the introduction of toxoid-antitoxin floccules by Glenny & Pope (1927) little has been done to improve their value as an antigen. Watson, Taggart & Shaw (1941) and Barr (1949) confirmed the work of these investigators in showing that heating at 80° C. increased their antigenic value.

It has been shown in this article that about 80% of the toxoid contained in floccules may be recovered if they are dissolved in n/20-NaOH, the alkali being allowed to act for 1 hr. before being neutralized with acid. A purity of between 0·002 and 0·0025 mg. N/Lf is obtained regularly. Such a dissolved floccule solution is a relatively poor antigen when tested in guinea-pigs, but may be rendered highly antigenic when precipitated with alum or adsorbed on AIPO4.

The method has the advantage of simplicity. It would appear that any medium capable of yielding a toxin convertible into flucculable toxoid may be used, thus doing away with cumbersome media-making methods. However, for the best results in terms of both recovery and purity, a high-value, quickly flocculating, toxoid should be used. Further, the choice of antitoxin appears to be important where recovery is concerned. With most of the antitoxins used, recoveries of between 70 and 90 % were got, although with that used, for most of the work recorded here, the recoveries were much lower.

It is not yet established which is the antigen of choice—alum-precipitated (P.D.F.) or AIPO4-adsorbed (A.D.F.) dissolved floccules. A.D.F. has the advantage of ease of preparation and of constant mineral carrier content, but further work is necessary to establish the optimum amount of carrier before a definite answer can be given. A paper on immunity responses in man will be published shortly in the Lancet.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , December 1950 , pp. 418 - 430
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1950

References

REFERENCES

Barr, M. (1949). The effect of heat upon diphtheria toxoid-antitoxin floccules. Brit. J. exp. Path., 30, 61–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Eaton, M. D. (1936). The purification and concentration of diphtheria toxin. I. Evaluation of previous methods; description of a new procedure. J. Bact, 31, 347–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glenny, A. T. & Pope, C. G. (1927). Diphtheria toxoid-antitoxin floccules. J. Path. Bact. 30, 587–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, L. B. (1947). Purified precipitated diphtheria toxoid of constant composition (P.T.A.P.). Lancet, 1, 282–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linggood, F. V. & Fenton, E. L. (1947). The production of diphtheria toxin by submerged culture in shaking flasks. Brit. J. exp. Path. 28, 354–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Pappenheimer, A. M. (Jr.) (1937). Diphtheria toxin. I. Isolation and characterization of a toxic protein from Corynebacterium diphtheriae filtrates. J. biol. Chem. 120, 543–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappenheimer, A. M. (Jr.) & Lawrence, H. S. (1948). Immunization of adults with diphtheria toxoid. III. Highly purified toxoid as an immunizing agent. Amer. J. Hyg. 4, 241–6.Google Scholar
Watson, A. F., Taggart, R. A. & Shaw, G. E. (1941). Diphtheria prophylaxis modern methods of preparing and assaying prophylactic agents, with a note on the essential nature of toxoid-antitoxin floccules. J. Path. Bact. 53, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar