Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:42:36.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application of three typing schemes (Penner, Lior, Preston) to strains of Campylobacter spp. isolated from three outbreaks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

D. N. Hutchinson ,
F. J. Bolton ,
D. M. Jones ,
E. M. Sutcliffe  and
J. D. Abbott
D. N. Hutchinson*
Affiliation:
The Public Health Laboratory, Preston Infirmary, Meadow Street, Preston, Lancashire, PR1 6PS, UK
F. J. Bolton
Affiliation:
The Public Health Laboratory, Preston Infirmary, Meadow Street, Preston, Lancashire, PR1 6PS, UK
D. M. Jones
Affiliation:
The Public Health Laboratory, Withington Hospital, Manchester, 3120 8LR, UK
E. M. Sutcliffe
Affiliation:
The Public Health Laboratory, Withington Hospital, Manchester, 3120 8LR, UK
J. D. Abbott
Affiliation:
The Public Health Laboratory, Withington Hospital, Manchester, 3120 8LR, UK
*
*Correspondence to Dr D. N. Hutchinson.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Campylobacters isolated from human, animal and environmental sources during the investigation of a milk-borne outbreak, an incident involving goats' milk and an outbreak associated with puppies were serotyped using the Penner and Lior schemes and biotyped using the Preston scheme. Application of these three methods to the incident strains demonstrated that heterogenicity amongst similar strains exists. This study has confirmed the need to use at least two typing methods when investigating epidemiologically-related strains and we suggest that a combination of a serotyping scheme and an extended biotyping scheme is the most useful.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 98 , Issue 2 , April 1987 , pp. 139 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

References

REFERENCES

Blaser, M. J., Taylor, D. N. & Feldman, R. A. (1983). Epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni infections. Epidemiological Reviews 5, 157–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolton, F. J., Holt, A. V. & Hutchinson, D. N. (1984). Campylobader biotyping scheme of epidemiological value. Journal of Clinical Pathology 37, 677–681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchinson, D. N., Bolton, F. J., Hinchliffe, P. M., Dawkins, H. C., Horsley, S. D., Jessop, E. G., Robertshaw, P. A. & Counter, D. E. (1985 a). Evidence of udder excretion of Campylobader jejuni as the cause of a milk-borne Campylobader outbreak. Journal of Hygiene 94, 205–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchinson, D. N., Bolton, F. J., Jelley, W. C. N., Mathews, W. G., Telford, D. R., Counter, D. E., Jessop, E. G. & Horsley, S. D. (1985 b). Campylobader enteritis associated with the consumption of raw goats milk. Lancet i, 1037–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. M., Sutcliffe, E. M. & Abbott, J. D. (1985). Serotyping of Campylobader species by combined use of two methods. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 4, 562–565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lior, H., Woodward, D. L., Edgar, J. A., Laroche, L. J. & Gill, P. (1982). Serotyping of Campylobacter jejuni by slide agglutination based on heat-labile antigenic factors. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 15, 761–768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penner, J. L. & Hennessy, J. N. (1980). Passive haemagglutination technique for serotyping Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni on the basis of soluble heat-stable antigens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 12, 732–737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skirrow, M. B. & Benjamin, J. (1982). The classification of ‘thermophilic’ campylobacters and their distribution in man and domestic animals. In Campylobacter: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis and Biochemistry (ed. Newell, D. G.), pp. 40–44. Lancaster: MTP Press.Google Scholar