Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T02:05:16.536Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bacteriological aspects of air-conditioning plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

W. Whyte
W. Whyte
Affiliation:
Building Services Research Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, W. 2, and the University Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, W. 1
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An investigation was carried out into the bacteriological performance of three air-conditioning plants in a hospital ward. Two of these plants had the facility for recirculating part of the ward air.

An equation has been derived comparing the concentration of bacteria which would be expected to be given off by the humidifiers in the ventilation system, with the concentration of bacteria in the recirculatory tank. The bacterial particles given off by these humidifiers were of nuclei droplet size, and were found to penetrate the filters used with a fair degree of ease. Although the number of bacteria in the humidifier water remained insignificant with a constant overflow of water into the recirculatory tank, on one occasion a build-up of bacteria was demonstrated when the overflow ceased. For hospital use humidifiers of a non-recirculatory type should be used.

The concentration of bacteria on the surface of the recirculatory ducts was assessed, as also were those on the surface of the supply ducts under full fresh air and recirculation. The concentration of bacteria in the supply ducts was low and the use of terminal filters was not merited, although care should be taken to prevent the build-up of bacteria in inlet grills and diffusers. The bacterial concentration in the exhaust ducts was found to be quite high. It was therefore thought that in critical areas, where the ventilation plant may be shut off, the use of some device to prevent reversed air flow may be necessary.

The count of various types of micro-organisms in the fresh air and two-thirds recirculated air are given along with their size distribution. The results of the effect of filtration on the concentration of bacterial particles throughout the air-conditioning plant is given under full fresh air and recirculation. These concentrations appear quite satisfactory. It was found that one set of filters had been overgrown by mould because of free water being brought over from the humidifier. Measures have been suggested to overcome this. When primary or prefinal filtration was approximately 90% efficient to Aloxite 50 (B.S. 2831 Test Dust no. 2) it was demonstrated that a fair approximation to the final filtration figure could be obtained by reference to the quoted efficiency of the final filter to Aloxite 50. After similar primary filtration it was demonstrated that the final filtration of filters against recirculated and fresh air was approximately the same. Owing to the higher number of Staph. aureus in recirculated air, higher efficiency filtration may be required.

Standards of filtration efficiency for critical and non-critical zones are suggested.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 66 , Issue 4 , December 1968 , pp. 567 - 584
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, A. A. (1958). New sampler for the collection, sizing and enumeration of viable airborne particles. J. Bact. 76, 471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barber, M. & Kuper, S. W. A. (1951). Identification of Staphylococcus pyogenes by the phosphatase reaction. J. Path. Bact. 63, 65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blowers, R. & Crew, B. (1960). Ventilation of operating theatres. J. Hyg., Camb. 58, 427.Google ScholarPubMed
Blowers, R., Lidwell, O. M. & Williams, R. E. O. (1962). Infection in operating theatres in relation to air conditioning equipment. J. Instn Heat. Vent. Engrs. 30, 244.Google Scholar
Blowers, R., Mason, G. A., Wallace, K. R. & Walton, M. (1955). Control of wound infection in a thoracic surgery unit. Lancet ii, 786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, M. (1950). A comparison of the recovery rate of organisms from cotton-wool and calcium alginate wool swabs. Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth 9, 50.Google Scholar
Kethley, T. W., Cown, W. B. & Fincher, E. L. (1962). Bacterial load of air in simulated operating rooms. Progress Report OH-19. Engineering Experiment Station, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. (1954). Air conditioning withfiltered air for dressing burns. Lancet i, 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. & Lilly, H. A. (1955). A selective plate medium for Clostridium welchii. J. Path. Bact. 70, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. & Lilly, H. A. (1958). The sources of hospital infection of wounds with Clostridium welchii. J. Hyg., Camb. 56, 169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
May, K. R. (1964). Calibration of a modified Andersen bacterial aerosol sampler. Appl. Microbiol. 12, 37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulcaster, K. D. & Stokes, E. A. (1966). The aspect of filtration in ventilation and air conditioning systems. J. Instn Heat. Vent. Engrs 34, 197.Google Scholar
Report (1948). Studies in air hygiene. Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun. no. 262.Google Scholar
Report (1962). Design and ventilation of operating-room suites for control of infection and for comfort. Lancet ii, 945.Google Scholar
Report (1964). The Hairmyres Experimental Ward Unit. J. Instn. Heat. Vent. Engrs 32, 330.Google Scholar
Shaffer, J. G. (1963). The laboratory in infection control. National Conference on Institutionally Acquired Infection.September, 1963. Publ. Hlth Serv. Publ. Wash. no. 1188.Google Scholar
Shooter, R. A., Taylor, G. W., Ellis, G. & Ross, J. P. (1956). Postoperative wound infection. Surgery Gynec. Obstet. 103, 257.Google ScholarPubMed
Tyrrell, D. A. J. (1967). The spread of viruses of the respiratory tract by the airborne route. In Airborne Microbes. Symp. Soc. gen. Microbiol. no. 7.Google Scholar