Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:08:58.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Combined use of rodenticidal dust and poison solution against house-mice (Mus musculus L.) infesting a food store

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

F. P. Rowe
Affiliation:
Infestation Control Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Tolworth, Surbiton, Surrey
A. H. J. Chudley
Affiliation:
Infestation Control Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Tolworth, Surbiton, Surrey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A food store infested with house-mice (Mus musculus L.) was treated with boxes containing 1% warfarin dust surrounding a solution containing 0·005% sodium warfarin and 5% sugar. The boxes were placed around the bases of the stacks, in the air-lanes between stacks and at eaves height at the gable ends of the store.

2. Census baitings with counted numbers of wheat grains showed that the mouse population was reduced by about 95% after 5 weeks of the poison treatment and by almost 100% after 20 weeks.

3. The field trial suggests that the combined use of rodenticidal dust and poison solution baiting points is a useful additional method of controlling M. musculus and is most effectively employed against mice living in warm, dry environments.

Thanks are expressed to our colleague Mr E. W. Powell, who co-operated in this work.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

References

Rowe, F. P. (1957). The control of house mice (Mus musculus L.) with a warfarin dust surrounding water baits. Sanitarian, 66, 183–5, 188.Google Scholar
Rowe, F. P. (1961). The toxicity and acceptability of the sodium salt of pindone, an anticoagulant rodenticide, to the house-mouse (Mus. musculus L.). J. Hyg., Camb., 59, 335–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar