Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:17:02.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparative study of tuberculosis mortality rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

V. H. Springett
V. H. Springett
Affiliation:
Prophit Scholar, Royal College of Physicians of London
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The recorded mortality from tuberculosis has fallen greatly in England and Wales since the middle of the nineteenth century when records were first available. The fall in rate has not occurred uniformly in all age groups however, and one result of this is that the maximum mortality rate in males is now occurring at a much later period of life than formerly.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , September 1950 , pp. 361 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1950

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Andvord, K. F. (1930). Norsk Mag. Loegevidensk. 91, 642.Google Scholar
Berg, G. (1939). The Prognosis of Open Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Lund.Google Scholar
Brownlee, J. (1917). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Comm., Lond. no.18.Google Scholar
Brownlee, J. (1920). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Comm., Lond., no. 46.Google Scholar
Frost, W. H. (1939). Amer. J. Hyg. 30, 91.Google Scholar
Frost, W. H. (1941). Collected Works of Wade Hampton Frost. Oxford University Press. London.Google Scholar
Kermack, W. O., McKendrick, A.G. & McKinlay, P.L. (1934). Lancet, 1, 698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, R. B. (1948). Med. J. Aust. 2, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moine, M. & Oudet, P. (1947). Bull. Inst. Nat. Hyg. 2, 241.Google Scholar
Picken, R. M. F. (1940). Publ. Hlth., Lond. 53, 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocks, P. (1949). Tubercle, Lond., 30, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocks, P. & Lewis-Faning, E. (1944). Brit. med. J. 1, 581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar