Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:26:37.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparison of the Power of a Germicide Emulsified or Dissolved, with an Interpretation of the Superiority of the Emulsified form

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Harriette Chick  and
C. J. Martin
Harriette Chick
Affiliation:
Assistant, Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine
C. J. Martin
Affiliation:
Director of the Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Henle (1889) found that “Creolin”, an emulsion of tar acids, was a more efficient disinfectant than could be explained from observations upon each of its constituents separately, and concluded that the extra efficiency was connected with the emulsified form. Henle's conclusions do not appear to us to be necessarily justified by his observations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 8 , Issue 5 , November 1908 , pp. 698 - 703
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1908

References

Chick, H. (1908). An investigation of the laws of disinfection. Journ. of Hygiene, Vol. VIII. p. 92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, (1907). Some disinfectant values. Journ. of the Royal Army Medical Corps, Vol. IX. p. 44.Google Scholar
Henle, (1889). Über Creolin und seine wirksamen Bestandtheile. Archiv f. Hygiene, Vol. IX. p. 188.Google Scholar
Madsen, and Nyman, (1907). Zur Theorie der Desinfektion. Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, Vol. LVII. p. 388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rideal, and Walker, (1903). The standardisation of disinfectants. Journ. of the Royal San. Inst. Vol. XXIV. p. 424.Google Scholar