Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:34:49.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Detection of Clostridium difficile toxins by enzyme immunoassay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

C. Krishnan
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the rapid diagnosis of antibiotic-associated colitis (AAC) is presented. Commercially available antisera to Clostridium difficile toxins contain antibodies to other antigens found in non-toxigenic C. difficile and other bacteria. Removal of these unwanted antibodies by absorption increased the specificity of ELISA for detection of C. difficile toxins. Specimens tested included 40 faecal extracts positive for cytotoxicity from cases of AAC, 30 diarrhoeic and 30 well-formed stools negative for cytotoxicity and 50 culture filtrates of toxigenic and non-toxigenic C. difficile and other clostridial species. Use of absorbed sera reduced false-positive reactions observed with faecal specimens frqm 23 to 8 %. About 90 % of specimens that were positive by the tissue culture cytotoxicity test were positive by ELISA using the absorbed sera. The relative merits of ELISA and other methods for the rapid diagnosis of AAC are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

References

REFERENCES

Bartlett, J. G. (1981). Laboratory diagnosis of antibiotic-associated colitis. Laboratory Medicine 12, 347351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, J. G. (1984). Treatment of antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis. Reviews of Injection Diseases 6S, S235–S241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloomberg, R. M. (1984). Characterization of the toxins of Clostridium difficile. Master of Sciences Thesis, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Ehrich, M., Van Tassell, R. L., Libby, J. M. & Wilkins, T. (1980). Production of Clostridium difficile antitoxin. Infection and Immunity 28, 10411043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, W. L. (1984). Antimicrobial agent-associated colitis and diarrhoea: historical background and clinical aspects. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 6S, S208S213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jarvis, W., Nunez-Montiel, O., Thompson, F., Dowell, V., Towns, M., Morris, G. & Hill, E., (1983). Comparison of bacterial isolation, cytotoxicity assay and counterimmunoelectrophoresis for the detection of Clostridium difficile and its toxin. Journal of Infectious Diseases 147, 778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laughon, B. E., Viscidi, R. P., Gdovin, S. L., Yolken, R. H. & Bartlett, J. G. (1984). Enzyme immunoassays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B in faecal specimens. Journal of Infectious Diseases 149, 781788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, H. G., Kennedy, M. & Lamont, J. T. (1982). Counterimmunoelectrophoresis vs. cytotoxicity assay for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxin. Journal of Infectious Diseases 145, 398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyerly, D. M., Phelps, C. J. & Wilkins, T. (1985). Monoclonal and specific polyclonal antibodies for immunoassay of Clostridium difficile toxin A. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 21, 1214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyerly, D. M., Sullivan, N. M. & Wilkins, T. (1983). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent asssay for Clostridium difficile toxin A. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 17, 7278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poxton, I. R. & Byrne, M. (1981). Detection of Clostridium difficile toxin by counterimmunoelectrophoresis: a note of caution. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 14, 349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rennie, R. P., Elliot, J. M., Nardini, M. A. & Thornley, J. H. (1984). Criteria for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin production by counterimmunoelectrophoresis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 20, 923926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, R. W., Kwasnik, I. & Tilton, R. C. (1980). Rapid detection of Clostridium difficile toxin in human faeces. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 12, 776779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. W., Kwasnik, I. & Tilton, R. C. (1983). Improved immunologic detection of Clostridium difficile antigen by counterimmunoelectrophoresis. Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease 1, 5963.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shahrabadi, M. S., Bryan, L. E., Gaffney, D., Coderre, S. E., Gordon, R. & Pai, C. H. (1984). Latex agglutination test for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin in stool samples. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 20, 339341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viscidi, R., Laughon, B. E., Hanvanich, M., Bartlett, J. G. & Yolken, R. H. (1984). Improved enzyme immunoassays for the detection of antigens in fecal specimens. Investigation and correction of interfering factors. Journal of Immunological Methods 67, 129143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voller, A., Bidwell, D. & Bartlett, A. (1980). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In Manual of Clinical Immunology, 2nd ed. (eds. Rose, N. R. and Friedman, H.), pp. 359371. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology.Google Scholar
Welch, D. F., Menge, S. K. & Matsen, J. M. (1980). Identification of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by counterimmunoelectrophoresis Journal of Clinical Microbiology 15, 347349.Google Scholar
West, S. E. H. & Wilkins, T. (1982). Problems associated with counterimmunoelectrophoresis assays for detecting Clostridium difficile toxin. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 15, 347349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, T. C. & Fung, J. C. (1983). Evaluation of the usefulness of counterimmunoelectrophoresis for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated colitis in clinical specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 17, 610613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yolken, R. H., Whitcomb, L. S., Marien, G., Bartlett, J. G., Libby, J., Ehrich, M. & Wilkins, T. (1981). Enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Clostridium difficile antigen. Journal of Infectious Diseases 144, 378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed