Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:48:18.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Detection of multiple strains of rabies virus RNA using primers designed to target Mexican vampire bat variants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2005

E. LOZA-RUBIO
Affiliation:
Centro Nacional de Investigaciones en Microbiología Animal, INIFAP, Carretera México Toluca Km. 15.5, Colonia Palo Alto, CP 05110, México
E. ROJAS-ANAYA
Affiliation:
Centro Nacional de Investigaciones en Microbiología Animal, INIFAP, Carretera México Toluca Km. 15.5, Colonia Palo Alto, CP 05110, México
V. M. BANDA-RUÍZ
Affiliation:
Centro Nacional de Investigaciones en Microbiología Animal, INIFAP, Carretera México Toluca Km. 15.5, Colonia Palo Alto, CP 05110, México
S. A. NADIN-DAVIS
Affiliation:
Rabies Center of Expertise, Ottawa Laboratory (Fallowfield), Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Canada
B. CORTEZ-GARCÍA
Affiliation:
Centro Nacional de Servicios de Diagnóstico en Salud Animal, CENASA-SENASICA, Km. 37.5, Carretera México-Pachuca, Tecamac, Mexico
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR), that uses primers specifically designed to amplify a portion of the N gene of vampire bat strains of rabies that circulate in Mexico, but also recognizing most of the rabies variants circulating in endemic areas, was established. This standardized PCR assay was able to detect viral RNA in tenfold serial dilutions up to a 107 dilution using stock virus at an original titre of 107·5 LD50. The assay was highly specific for rabies virus. Forty different rabies isolates recovered from different species and geographical regions in the country were diagnosed as positive and negative by the fluorescent antibody test (FAT). These same samples were re-examined by both PCR and the mouse inoculation test (MIT). Compared with MIT the PCR exhibited an epidemiological sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 91% while its positive predictive value was 96%.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2005 Cambridge University Press