Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:01:10.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Detection of Trypanosoma evansi infection in clinically ill cattle, buffaloes and horses using various diagnostic tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2009

R. LAHA
Affiliation:
ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Meghalaya, India
N. K. SASMAL*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Parasitology, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
*
*Author for correspondence: Professor N. K. Sasmal, Ph.D., Professor and Head, Department of Veterinary Parasitology, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, 37 Belgachia Road, Kolkata 700037, India. (Email: dnksasmal@rediffmail.com)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This study was undertaken to detect Trypanosoma evansi infection in clinically ill cattle, buffaloes and horses that were suspected of ‘surra’ infection. Various diagnostic tests were utilized in order to assess the prevalence of infection in the clinically ill and ‘suspected’ animals. Animals in the Eastern Region of India were systematically studied for T. evansi infection, which had not been tested for previously. Examination of Giemsa-stained blood smears detected 5·3%, 9·4% and 40·6% infections; the mouse inoculation test detected 18·4%, 15·6% and 46·9% infections whereas an in-house ELISA detected anti-trypanosomal antibodies in 42·1%, 43·8% and 65·6% infections in clinically ill buffaloes, cattle and horses, respectively. It can be concluded that T. evansi is prevalent in cattle, buffaloes and horses in the Eastern Region of India.

Type
Short Report
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

The haemoprotozoan parasite, Trypanosoma evansi, is the causal agent of a disease in domestic animals, which is popularly known as ‘surra’. However, the disease is not only restricted to animals. Recently, the infection has also been reported in humans in India [Reference Joshi1], which established the zoonotic importance of the disease. Veterinarians and clinicians are responsible for the handling of clinical cases which are suspected of being surra infections. Hence, there is a need to know the prevalence of the disease in suspected animals and also within the different regions of India in order to define appropriate control programmes against the disease. However, the diagnosis of T. evansi infection is problematic, mainly because of its varied and non-specific clinical manifestations in enzootic areas. Parasite detection techniques by examination of Giemsa-stained blood smears (GSBS) are not always reliable for current infections when the level of parasitaemia remains low and fluctuates, particularly during the chronic stage of infection. Hence, in the present study, as an alternative method of diagnosis of suspected cases of surra, the mouse inoculation test (MIT) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were used in addition to examination of GSBS, for the detection of surra in clinically ill and suspected cases of cattle, buffaloes and horses.

This study was undertaken on samples from buffaloes, cattle and horses which were proven to be clinically ill and suspected of T. evansi infection as observed by clinical signs. Blood samples from these clinically ill animals, suspected of surra, were collected aseptically and each sample was processed for the preparation of blood smears for Giemsa stain, MIT and for collection of serum. For the detection of anti-T. evansi antibodies in suspected buffaloes, cattle and horses, an indirect ELISA was used as described previously [Reference Luckins2, Reference Jithendran, Rao and Mishra3]. For the detection of antibodies against T. evansi in serum samples collected from suspected buffaloes and cattle, crude whole cell lysate (WCL) antigen prepared from trypanosomes isolated from buffalo origin were used. Similarly crude WCL antigen prepared from trypanosomes isolated from horse origin was used for the detection of T. evansi in serum samples from suspected horses. Sera of cattle, buffaloes and horses, found positive for T. evansi infection either in blood-smear examination or in MIT, or in both, were used as positive sera. Sera collected from non-enzootic areas that was shown to be negative for T. evansi infection by both GSBS and MIT, and which was also negative by an indirect ELISA during a repeated chequerboard titration, were used as negative sera. For each ELISA test, crude sonicated buffalo antigen, 1·35 μg protein/well and horse antigen 1·26 μg protein/well, were coated. The obtained optical density (OD) values were expressed as percent positivity (PP) by dividing the average OD value of the sample by the median value of the OD values of the strong positive control, and multiplying by 100. The ELISA cut-off value was determined as the mean PP obtained from the negative sera multiplied by 2.

A total of 102 clinically suspected animals (38 buffaloes, 32 cattle, 32 horses) were examined by GSBS, MIT and the antibody detection ELISA (Ab-ELISA) to determine the prevalence of the disease. Twenty-two cattle from an organized cattle farm in a non-endemic area, which were clinically healthy, were screened by both the parasitological and the serological test for comparison. The examination by GSBS detected 5·3%, 9·4% and 40·6% infections in buffaloes, cattle and horses, respectively. Low levels of parasitaemia were observed in cattle and buffaloes and high levels were observed in horses. The MIT detected 18·4%, 15·6% and 46·9% infections in buffaloes, cattle and horses, respectively. The Ab-ELISA detected anti-trypanosomal antibody in 42·1%, 43·8% and 65·6% clinically ill buffaloes, cattle and horses, respectively (Table 1). All healthy animals were found negative by parasitological examination and Ab-ELISA test.

In the present study cattle, buffaloes and horses incubating T. evansi might have enabled the production of antibodies by allowing sufficient time after infection. In contrast, due to the fluctuating level of parasitaemia, T. evansi might not be detected during examination by GSBS and MIT. This might be the reason for the lower prevalence observed by examination of GSBS and MIT, in comparison to the Ab-ELISA test. A comparison of the prevalence of this infection with the Southern part of India shows a low prevalence of T. evansi in cattle (1·4%) and buffaloes (2·7%) as recorded by GSBS [Reference Das, Nandy and Mohankumar4].

Table 1. Detection of Trypanosoma evansi infection in clinically ill and suspected cases of buffaloes, cattle and horses by examination of GSBS, MIT and indirect ELISA

GSBS, Giemsa-stained blood smear; MIT, mice inoculation test; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Compared to Eastern India, the disease is quite prevalent in Northern India. Eight outbreaks were recorded in cattle and buffaloes during a 5-year period and it has been reported that 295 animals were affected of which 142 died [Reference Batra, Kumar and Kulshreshta5]. Circulating antigen of T. evansi was detected by antigen detection ELISA (Ag-ELISA) in 55·7% infected/suspected buffaloes against 19·2% positivity by wet blood film (WBF) examination. In the case of horses 56·3% infection was detected by Ag-ELISA and 23·8% by WBF. Ab-ELISA detected 35·9% cases in buffaloes and 37·5% in horses from Northern India [Reference Singh6]. Thus, it has been shown that the prevalence of T. evansi infection is greater in Northern India than in the Eastern Region of India. In a recent study, in randomly collected sera samples of cattle, buffaloes and horses, an antibody detection test showed the presence of anti-T. evansi antibodies in 20·7% and 11·1% sera samples of slaughtered cattle and buffaloes, respectively, in 5·7% of sera samples of cattle collected from villages and in 10% of sera samples of horses [Reference Laha and Sasmal7]. Recently, it has been reported that T. evansi can be established in an unnatural host, the pigeon [Reference Mandal, Laha and Sasmal8]. It has also been established that a patient was infected with T. evansi, due to a host genetic defect, i.e. the lack of apolipoprotein L-I [Reference Vanhollebeke9]. Moreover, another species of Trypanosoma, i.e. Trypanosoma lewisi, which is generally non-infective for humans, has recently been reported to infect human patients in India [Reference Kaur10]. From the present study 50% of clinically ill and suspected animals were positive for T. evansi infection. Due to the fact that T. evansi has zoonotic significance, veterinarians and clinicians handling the clinical material suspected of surra infection should do so with care.

In conclusion, a considerable number of animals in the Eastern Region of India, which were suspected of surra infection, are infected with T. evansi and awareness of this should be raised especially in high-risk workers including veterinarians and farmers.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors are grateful to the Vice Chancellor, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, Kolkata – 700037, West Bengal India, for providing the facilities to undertake this investigation.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

References

REFERENCES

1. Joshi, PP, et al. Human Trypanosomiasis caused by Trypanosoma evansi in India: the first case report. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2005; 73: 491495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Luckins, AG. Detection of antibodies in trypanosome-infected cattle by means of a microplate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Tropical Animal Health and Production 1977; 9: 5362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Jithendran, KP, Rao, JR, Mishra, AK. Evaluation of antigenic preparations for the diagnosis of experimental Trypanosoma evansi infection in bovine calves. Journal of Veterinary Parasitology 1997; 11: 1721.Google Scholar
4. Das, AK, Nandy, NC, Mohankumar, OR. Prevalence of bovine surra in Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. Indian Veterinary Journal 1998; 75: 526529.Google Scholar
5. Batra, UK, Kumar, A, Kulshreshta, RC. A study on surra in bovines in some parts of Haryana State. Indian Veterinary Journal 1994; 71: 971974.Google Scholar
6. Singh, V, et al. Polyclonal antibody-based antigen-detection immunoassay for diagnosis of Trypanosoma evansi in buffaloes and horses. Veterinary Parasitology 1995; 56: 261267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Laha, R, Sasmal, NK. Sero-prevalence of Trypanosoma evansi infection in cattle, buffaloes and horses by antibody detection enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 2008; 78: 801804.Google Scholar
8. Mandal, M, Laha, R, Sasmal, NK. First report of establishment of Trypanosoma evansi infection in pigeon nestlings (Columba livia). Journal of Parasitology 2008; 94: 14281429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Vanhollebeke, B, et al. Human Trypanosoma evansi infection linked to a lack of Apolipoprotein L-I. New England Journal of Medicine 2006; 355: 27522756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Kaur, R, et al. A rare case of trypanosomiasis in a two month old infant in Mumbai, India. Journal of Communicable Diseases 2007; 39: 7174.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Detection of Trypanosoma evansi infection in clinically ill and suspected cases of buffaloes, cattle and horses by examination of GSBS, MIT and indirect ELISA