Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:13:53.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The disinfection of closed atmospheres with germicidal aerosols

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

C. C. Twort ,
A. H. Baker ,
S. R. Finn  and
E. O. Powell
C. C. Twort
Affiliation:
From Portslade Laboratories, Ltd., Portslade, Sussex
A. H. Baker
Affiliation:
From Portslade Laboratories, Ltd., Portslade, Sussex
S. R. Finn
Affiliation:
From Portslade Laboratories, Ltd., Portslade, Sussex
E. O. Powell
Affiliation:
From Portslade Laboratories, Ltd., Portslade, Sussex
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A form of ultramicroscope apparatus is described which enables the evaporation of mist droplets to be followed for long periods. A rough method of estimating the size distribution in aerosols is also given.

The rates of evaporation of particles of various phenol solutions have been studied, the solutions chosen being of possible interest as aerial germicides. It is shown that the typical evaporation curve for a binary mixture consists of three parts, which in actual cases need not all be present. Sometimes the more detailed history of an evaporation can be deduced from the results.

The approximate effective size distributions in mists of hexyl-resorcinol—propylene-glycol solutions have been measured and compared with the evaporation rates.

It is shown that the efficiency of aerial germicides is partly a function of their volatility, and three rough classes are distinguished. But biological evidence is adduced which suggests that the solubility of the germicides in water may be of equal importance, and that the liquid in which the germicide is dissolved is not without effect.

A centrifuge is described which enables the maximum particle size in a mist to be limited to a desired value.

Methods of estimating quantitatively germicidal aerosols are discussed, and a method described which has been found to give reasonably accurate results in practice. Tentative experiments have been made to determine whether the materials studied are likely to cause corrosion of metals, etc., after pro-longed use.

The collision theory of aerial disinfection is discussed, as is also the applicability of Langmuir's treatment of the evaporation of fine particles in mixtures.

The development of the experimental technique involved in the biological investigations appertaining to air disinfection has been discussed, together with the numerous fallacies arising and the means by which these have been overcome.

The construction of a special pair of experimental chambers is described, and details given, both as regards the bacteria and germicides, of the exact experimental conditions under which the most consistent results can be obtained.

The requisite characteristics of germicidal mixtures which could be utilized for air disinfection are considered, and examples of suitable germicides and solvents are given. The method of recording and evaluating the results of a varied assortment of experiments is explained to facilitate inter se comparison.

Examples are given of the lethal effectiveness in the air of several germicides in broth emulsions, both with and without the presence of serum, on stock cultures of selected types of bacteria. The sensitivity to the germicides of the bacteria making up the flora of the average normal saliva is compared with that of broth emulsions of bacteria.

10% hexyl-resorcinol dissolved in propylene-glycol+0·05 % sulphonated lorol (“S2”) was the most effective all round germicidal mixture of those tested. Various other germicides were found equal in germicidal activity in the air, but for reasons stated have been deemed unsuited for use in the presence of man.

The relationship between germicidal efficiency in the air and mist particle size and persistence has been studied by means of centrifuged mists. Particles of 0·5–1·0μ radius are shown to be the most useful in dealing with bacterial particles containing organic matter. Laboratory cultures, emulsified in broth, have been sterilized in mist dispersions by droplets of bactericides at least as small as 0·25μ radius.

Tests on the penetrating abilities of bactericidal mists and bacteria through certain cloths have been performed.

Experiments to demonstrate the surface sterilizing properties of aerosols have been performed, and examples of differences in effect on horizontal and vertical surfaces are noted.

The degree of tolerance of man and animals (mice) for a number of phenolic substances and some organic solvents has been compared with the degree of tolerance of bacteria for the same substances.

The tests on man have been confined to the detection by the special senses of the substances suspended in the air as a fine mist.

The tests on animals were designed to show acute and chronic effects, the results being recorded in terms of clinical symptoms and pathological changes in the organs. A record was also kept of the findings as regards protozoal parasites of the host, and compared with the normal incidence among ordinary laboratory stock.

Tests on bacteria were instituted for the purpose of gaining information on the host-parasite tolerance ratio for our germicides when in the air and when in the test-tube.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , May 1940 , pp. 253 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1940

References

REFERENCES

Air analysis, Report of Sub-Committee on Bacteriological Procedures of. Year Book, 1936–1937. Supplement. Amer. J. Publ. Hlth, 1937, 27, No. 3.Google Scholar
Bechhold, H. (1935). Improvements in rendering micro-organisms innocuous. British Patent No. 472, 623.Google Scholar
Chick, H. & Martin, C. J. (1908). The principles involved in the standardization of disinfectants and the influence of organic matter upon germicidal value. J. Hyg., Camb., 8, 654–703.Google ScholarPubMed
Coulthard, C. E., Marshall, J. & Pyman, F. L. (1929). The variation of phenol coefficients in homologous series of phenols. J. chem. Soc. 1930, pp. 280–91.Google Scholar
Cunningham, E. (1910). On the velocity of steady fall of spherical particles through fluid medium. Proc. roy. Soc. A, 83, 357–65.Google Scholar
Finn, S. R., Powell, E. O. & Shepherd's Industries Ltd. (1939). Aerosol centrifuge. British Patent Application No. 17, 525.Google Scholar
Folpmers, T. (1934). Determination of traces of phenols in surface water. Chem. Weekbl. 31, 330–3. Cited in Brit. Chem. Abstr. B (1934), 53, 606.Google Scholar
de Forcrand, (1901). Vaporisation et hydratation du glycol éthylénique. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 132, 689–95.Google Scholar
Fuchs, N. (1934). Zur Theorie der Koagulation. Hoppe-Seyl. Z. A, 171, 199–208.Google Scholar
Houghton, G. V. & Pelly, R. G. (1937). A colorimetric method for the determination of traces of phenol in water. Analyst, 62, 117–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langmuir, I. (1918). The evaporation of small spheres. Phys. Rev. (2), 12, 368–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, J. (1868). An address on the antiseptic system of treatment in surgery. Brit. med. J. 2, 53–6, 101–2, 461–3, 515–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morse, H. W. (1910). On evaporation from the surface of a solid sphere. Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts Sci. 45, 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niederl, J. B.et al. (1938). Diisobutylphenol. Industr. Engng Chem. Industrial Ed. 30, 1269–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulvertaft, R. J. V., Lemon, G. J. & Walker, J. W. (1939). Atmospheric and surface sterilization by aerosols. Lancet, 1, 443–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulvertaft, R. J. V. & Walker, J. W. (1939). The control of air-borne bacteria and fungus spores by means of aerosols. J. Hyg., Camb., 39, 696–708.Google ScholarPubMed
Scarpa, O. (1939). Sulla necessità di ammettere affinità chimica fra solvente e soluto. R.C. Accad. Lincei, 29, 247–53.Google Scholar
Shepherd, T. L., Finn, S. R., Powell, E. O. & Shepherd's Industries Ltd. (1939). Improvements in aerosols particularly those having germicidal, disinfecting, insecticidal or medicinal qualities. British Patent Application No. 21, 820.Google Scholar
Siedentopf, H. & Zsigmondy, R. (1903). Über Sichtbarmachung und Grossenbestimmung ultramikroskopischen Teilchen, mit besonderer Anwendung auf Goldrubingläser. Ann. Phys., Lpz. (4), 10, 1–39.Google Scholar
v. Smoluchowski, M. (1916). Versuch einer mathematischen Theorie der Koagulations-kinetik kolloider Lösungen. Hoppe-Seyl. Z. 92, 129–68.Google Scholar
Tauzin, P. (1939). Ultramicroscopie à grande distance frontale pour l'étude des aérosols. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 209, 27–30.Google Scholar
Trillat, A. (1938 a). Les aérosols microbiens: applications. Bull. Acad. Méd., Paris, (3), 16, 49–57.Google Scholar
Trillat, A. (1938 b). Proprietés des aérosols microbiens: applications. Ann. Hyg. publ., Paris, 119, 64–72.Google Scholar
Trillat, A. (1939). Aérosols microbiens (Historique). Sur leur rôle dans la contagion et sur leur sterilisation. Rev. Path. Comp. 39, 292.Google Scholar
Trillat, A. & Fouassier, M. (1912). Action des doses infinitésimales de diverses substances alcalines fixes ou volatiles sur la vitalité des microbes. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 155, 1184–6.Google Scholar
Trillat, A. & Fouassier, M. (1914). Influence de la radioactivité de l'air sur les gouttelettes microbiennes de l'atmosphère. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 159, 817–19.Google Scholar
Twort, C. C. (1913). The rapidity with which contamination of the thoracic cavity and its contained glands follows infection of the peritoneal cavity. Lancet, 2, 216–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twort, C. C. & Lyth, R. (1935). A new method for measuring carcinogenicity. J. Hyg., Camb., 35, 125–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Twort, C. C., Lyth, R. & Twort, J. M. (1936). The significance of density, refractive index and viscosity of mineral oils in relation to the type and degree of animal reaction. J. Hyg., Camb., 37, 14–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twort, J. M. & Twort, C. C. (1932). Disease in relation to carcinogenic agents among 60,000 experimental mice. J. Path. Bact. 35, 219–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, W. F. (1935). Air-borne infection and sanitary air control. J. industr. Hyg. 17, 253–7.Google Scholar
Wells, W. F. (1936). Centrifuging apparatus. U.S. Patent No. 2,043,313.Google Scholar
Wells, W. F. (1938). Air-borne infection. Mod. Hosp. 51, 66.Google Scholar
Wells, W. F. & Brown, H. W. (1936). Recovery of influenza virus suspended in air and its destruction by ultraviolet radiation. Amer. J. Hyg. 24, 407–13.Google Scholar
Wells, W. F. & Fair, G. M. (1935). Viability of B. coli exposed to ultraviolet radiation in air. Science, 82, 280–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, W. F. & Wells, M. W. (1936). Air-borne infection. J. amer. med. Ass. 107, 1698–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, W. F. & Wells, M. W. (1938). Measurement of sanitary ventilation. Amer. J. Publ. Hlth, 28, 343–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whytlaw-Gray, R. & Patterson, H. S. (1932). Smoke, 1st ed. 188 pages, 12 plates, 33 diagrams. London: Edward Arnold and Co.Google Scholar
Whytlaw-Gray, R. & Speakman, J. B. (1932). Smokes. Part II. A method of determining the size of particles in smokes. Proc. roy. Soc. A, 102, 615–27.Google Scholar
Whytlaw-Gray, R., Speakman, J. B. & Campbell, J. H. P. (1922). Smokes. Part I. A study of their behaviour and a method of determining the number of particles they contain. Proc. roy. Soc. A, 102, 600–15.Google Scholar