Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:50:54.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimation of the Salmonella enterica prevalence in finishing swine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2004

H. S. HURD ,
J. D. McKEAN ,
R. D. GRIFFITH  and
M. H. ROSTAGNO
H. S. HURD
Affiliation:
Pre-Harvest Food Safety and Enteric Diseases Research Unit, USDA, Agricultural Research Unit, Ames, IA 50010, USA
J. D. McKEAN
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
R. D. GRIFFITH
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Preventive Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
M. H. ROSTAGNO
Affiliation:
Pre-Harvest Food Safety and Enteric Diseases Research Unit, USDA, Agricultural Research Unit, Ames, IA 50010, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The study objective was to evaluate three methods of Salmonella enterica prevalence estimation in swine herds (faecal culture, culture of abattoir-collected samples, and serum ELISA). From each of six swine herds, we necropsied approximately 100 finishing pigs (>70 kg); one-half on farm and the other half at the abattoir, after transport and approximately 2·5 h holding. We collected the same samples for S. enterica culture at both locations (1 g faecal, 10 g caecal contents, ileocaecal lymph nodes, superficial inguinal lymph nodes, 25 g of gluteal muscle for serum ELISA). On farm, the 1 g faecal sample only detected 13·3% (2/15) of all positive pigs necropsied on farm. However, with abattoir and on-farm results combined, the faecal sample detected 57·4% (74/129) of positive pigs. Abattoir-collected samples provided prevalence estimates much higher than on-farm collected samples (39·9 vs. 5·3%; P<0·001). This study shows that faecal samples have a low sensitivity for detecting infected pigs and that abattoir-collected samples overestimate the on-farm S. enterica prevalence. For most herds, serology overestimated the on-farm culture prevalence.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 132 , Issue 1 , February 2004 , pp. 127 - 135
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Footnotes

Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.