Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:29:43.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Human toxoplasma infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. K. A. Beverley
Affiliation:
Department of Bacteriology, University of Sheffield
C. P. Beattie
Affiliation:
Department of Bacteriology, University of Sheffield
Cissie Roseman
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Industrial Medicine, University of Sheffield
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. By the dye test, toxoplasma antibodies in titres of 1/4 or more, were found in the sera of 25% of a sample of adult population of Sheffield.

2. Significantly higher, when strength as well as number was considered, were the reactions of the sera of veterinary surgeons and abattoir workers.

3. Still higher were the reactions of the sera of those who handled rabbits. Highest of all were those of rabbit trappers.

4. Toxoplasma antibodies active to a titre of 1/40 in the dye test were found in 34% of wild rabbits and, to a titre of 1/160, in 5%.

Thanks are due to the hundreds of volunteers who made the survey possible. The Medical Officers of Health of Sheffield, Leeds and Manchester and the veterinary officers, superintendents of markets and food inspectors in these cities made admirable arrangements, which are gratefully recorded, for the obtaining of specimens. Valuable advice and help in obtaining samples from rabbits were given by officers of the Pests Control Division of the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries and by their trappers. Dr Marmion supplied some of the sera from veterinary surgeons. The assistance of the technical staff of the Bacteriology Department, University of Sheffield, is gratefully acknowledged. The work was assisted by a grant to C.P.B. from the Medical Research Council.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1954

References

REFERENCES

Bamatter, F. (1952). Wien. klin. Wschr. 64, 185.Google Scholar
Beverley, J. K. A. & Beattie, C. P. (1952). J. clin. Path. 5, 350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanc, G., Bruneau, J. & Chabaud, A. (1950). Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 78, 277.Google Scholar
Cathie, I. A. B. & Dudgeon, J. A. (1949). J. clin. Path. 2, 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, M. & Siim, J. C. (1951). Lancet, 1, 1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowen, D. & Wolf, A. (1950). J. exp. Med. 92, 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyles, D. E. (1952). J. Parasit. 38, 226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, R. L., Docton, F. L., Chamberlain, D. M. & Cole, C. R. (1952). Amer. J. vet. Res. 13, 181.Google Scholar
Feldman, H. A. (1953). Amer. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 2, 420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, H. A. & Sabin, A. (1949). Pediatrics, 4, 798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, O. D. (1951). Lancet, 2, 904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franke, H. & Horst, H. G. (1952). Z. klin. Med. 149, 255.Google Scholar
Frenkel, J. K. (1948). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 68, 634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gard, S. (1951). Nord. Med. 45, 352.Google Scholar
Giroud, P., Jadin, J. & Reizes, C. (1951). Bull. Soc. Pat. exot. 44, 422.Google Scholar
Giroud, P. & Le Gac, P. (1952). C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 234, 1924.Google Scholar
Havlik, O. (1952). Čas. Lék. čes. 90, 1516. Abstract in Trop. Dis. Bull. (1952), 49, 554.Google Scholar
Hulphers, G., Lilleengen, K. & Rubarth, S. (1947). Svensk VetTidskr. 52, 295.Google Scholar
Jacobs, L. (1953). Amer. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 2, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, L., Melton, M. L. & Jones, F. E. (1952). J. Parasit. 38, 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, G. (1950). Klin. Wschr. 28, 602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozar, S., Wysocka, F. & Sikorska, S. (1952). Bull. Stat. Inst. Marine Trop. Med. Gedansk. Poland, 4, 37. Abstract in Trop. Dis. Bull. (1953), 50, 346.Google Scholar
Laven, H. & Westphal, A. (1950). Z. Tropenmed. u. Parasit. 2, 221.Google Scholar
MacDonald, A. (1950). Lancet, 2, 560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, J. H. (1951). Nord. med. 45, 344.Google Scholar
Marotel, G. & Pierron, P. M. (1943). Rev. med. vet. Lyon. et de Toulouse, 94, 112. Abstract in Bull. Inst. Pasteur (1946), 44, 192.Google Scholar
Mesnil, E. & Sarrailhe, A. (1913). C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 74, 1325.Google Scholar
Muhlpfordt, H. (1951). Z. Tropenmed. u. Parasit. 3 (2), 205. Abstract in Trop. Dis. Bull. (1952), 49, 322.Google Scholar
Olafson, P. & Monlux, W. S. (1942). Cornell Vet. 32, 176.Google Scholar
Otten, E., Westphal, A. & Kajahn, E. (1951). Klin. Wschr. 29, 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrin, T. L., Brigham, G. D. & Pickens, E. G. (1943). J. infect. Dis. 72, 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piekarski, G. (1949). Z. Parasitenk. 14, 388.Google Scholar
Pinkerton, H. & Henderson, R. G. (1941). J. Amer. med. Ass. 116, 807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabin, A. B. (1942). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 51, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabin, A. B. (1949). Pediatrics, 4, 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabin, A. B. & Feldman, H. A. (1948). Science, 108, 660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sexton, R. E., Eyles, D. E. & Dillman, R. E. (1953). Amer. J. Med. 14, 366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siim, J. C. (1950). 6th Int. Congr. Pediatrics. Summary of Communications.Google Scholar
Skipper, E., Beverley, J. K. A. & Beattie, C. P. Submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Ström, J. (1951). Acta med. scand. 139, 244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thalhammer, O. (1951). Wien. klin. Wschr. 63, 565.Google Scholar
Van Thiel, P. H. (1950). Docum. neerl. indones. Morb. trop. 1, 264.Google Scholar
Verlinde, J. D. & Makstenieks, O. (1950). Leeuwenhoek ned. Tijdschr, 16, 366.Google Scholar
Verlinde, J. D. & Makstenieks, O. (1951). Ned. Tijdschr. Geneesk. 95, 2050. Abstract in Trop. Dis. Bull. (1951), 48, 928.Google Scholar
Weinman, D. (1952). Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, A. & Bauer, F. (1952). Z. Tropenmed. u. Parasit. 3, 326.Google Scholar
Wiktor, T. J. (1950). Ann. Soc. belge Méd. trop. 30, 97.Google Scholar
Winsser, J. (1952). Ergebn. Hyg. Bakt. 27, 1.Google Scholar
von Zeipel, G. & Linder, L. A. (1951). Acta path. microbiol. scand. 29, 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
For further references see Eyles, D. E. & Frenkel, J. K. (1952), ‘A Bibliography of Toxoplasmosis and Toxoplasma gondii’, Public Health Service Publication, no. 247, Washington U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar