Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T18:47:17.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The immune response to viruses in calves: II. The response in young calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

C. J. Sanderson
C. J. Sanderson
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Injections of virus in calves up to about 5 weeks of age caused either the production of both IgM and IgG, or the production of only IgG, or no detectable antibody. In all but one case priming for a secondary response occurred even in the absence of a detectable primary response. These results suggest that in the young calf immunological memory is more readily induced than IgG synthesis. IgM appeared by the 7th or 10th day, which was similar to the response in older calves. IgG was more variable in its appearances but was usually considerably delayed relative to the response in older calves. In general only low levels of IgM were formed in the primary response and it was virtually absent from the secondary responses. Higher levels of IgM were formed after reovirus inoculation than after Murray Valley encephalitis virus or Getah viruses. The delay in appearance of IgG was more pronounced in response to Getah than to reovirus or Murray Valley encephalitis virus. High levels of maternally derived passive antibody inhibited the development of an active response, although in one animal a response occurred in the presence of low levels of passive antibody.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , September 1968 , pp. 461 - 470
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

References

Bellanti, J. A., Eitzman, D. V., Robbins, J. B. & Smith, R. T. (1963). The development of the immune response: Studies on the agglutinin response to Salmonella flagellar antigens in the new born rabbit. J. exp. Med. 117, 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buffe, D. & Burtin, P. (1967). Formation des immunoglobulines chez le fœtus et le jeune enfant. Annls Inst. Pasteur, Paris 112, 468.Google Scholar
Dawson, P. S., Darbyshire, J. H. & Lamont, P. H. (1965). The inoculation of calves with parainfluenza 3 virus. Res. vet. Sci. 6, 108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henning, M. W. (1953). Calf paratyphoid. 2. Artificial immunization. Onderstepoort J. vet. Res. 26, 25.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. B., Bradley, S. G. & Watson, D. W. (1966). Ontogeny of the immune response. II. Characterization of 19S gamma-G and 7S gamma-G immunoglobulins in the primary and secondary response in piglets. J. Immun. 97, 189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambert, G., Amerault, T. E., Manthei, C. A. & Goode, E. R. (1961). Immunogenic response of calves vaccinated at different ages with Br. abortus strain 19. Proc. U.S. Livestk sanit. Ass. no. 65, p. 93.Google Scholar
Murphy, F. A., Aalund, O., Osebold, J. W. & Carroll, E. J. (1964). Gamma globulins of bovine lacteal secretions. Archs Biochem Biophys. 108, 230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nossal, G. J. V., Austin, C. M. & Ada, G. L. (1965). Antigens in immunity. VII. Analysis of immunological memory. Immunology 9, 333.Google ScholarPubMed
Pierce, A. E. & Feinstein, A. (1965). Biophysical and immunological studies on bovine immune globulins with evidence for selective transport within the mammary gland from maternal plasma to colostrum. Immunology 8, 106.Google ScholarPubMed
Sanderson, C. J. (1968 a). The immune response to viruses in calves. I. Response to Murray Valley encephalitis virus. J. Hyg., Camb. 66, 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, C. J. (1968 b). Arbovirus non-specific inhibitors and natural agglutinins in bovine serum. Res. vet. Sci. 9, 400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverstein, A. M. & Kraner, K. L. (1964). In Molecular and Cellular Basis of Antibody Formation (ed. Sterzl, J.), p. 341. New York and London: Academic Press (1965).Google Scholar
Silverstein, A. M., Uhr, J. W., Kraner, K. L. & Lukes, R. J. (1963). Fetal response to antigenic stimulus. II. Antibody production by the fetal lamb. J. exp. Med. 117, 799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. N. & Ingram, D. G. (1965). Immunological responses of young animals. II. Antibody production in calves. Can. vet. J. 6, 226.Google Scholar
Stanley, N. F. (1961). Relationship of hepatoencephalomyelitis virus and reovirus. Nature, Lond. 189, 687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterzl, J., Mandel, L., Miler, I. & Riha, I. (1964). In Molecular and Cellular Basis of Antibody Formation (ed. Sterzl, J.), p. 351. New York and London: Academic Press (1965).Google Scholar
Svehag, S.-E. & Mandel, B. (1964 a). The formation and properties of poliovirus-neutralizing antibody. 1.19S and 7S antibody formation: differences in kinetics and antigen dose requirement for induction. J. exp. Med. 119, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svehag, S.-E. & Mandel, B. (1964 b). The formation and properties of poliovirus-neutralizing antibody. II. 19S and 7S antibody formation: differences in antigen dose requirement for sustained synthesis, anamnesis and sensitivity to X-irradiation. J. exp. Med. 119, 21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uhr, W. J., Dancis, J., Franklin, E. C., Finkelstein, M. S. & Lewis, E. W. (1962). The antibody response to bacteriophage phiX 174 in newborn premature infants. J. clin. Invest. 41, 1509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uhr, J. W. & Finkelstein, M. S. (1963). Antibody formation. IV. Formation of rapidly sedimenting and slowly sedimenting antibodies and immunological memory to bacteriophage phiX 174. J. exp. Med. 117, 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. M. (1966). Ontogeny of the immune response. II. Correlations between the development of the afferent and efferent limbs. J. exp. Med. 124, 57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed