Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:51:57.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The incidence of infective drug resistance in strains of Escherichia coli isolated from diseased human beings and domestic animals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

H. Williams Smith
Affiliation:
Animal Health Trust, Stock, Essex
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A high incidence of drug resistance, mostly of the infective type, was found amongst strains of Escherichia coli isolated from human beings suffering from neonatal diarrhoea, calves and lambs suffering from neonatal diarrhoea or bacteraemia, pigs suffering from neonatal or post-weaning diarrhoea or bowel oedema and from fowls suffering from ‘coli-septicaemia’. The strains from the human beings, pigs and fowls, and those from calves and lambs suffering from bacteraemia, belonged to serotypes generally accepted as being pathogenic for these species.

Complex drug-resistance patterns were a common feature, particularly amongst the human and calf strains, some being resistant to six drugs. Only two drugs, polymyixin and nalidixic acid, were active on all the strains.

The incidence of drug resistance amongst pig strains was twice as great in those isolated in 1965 as in those isolated in 1960–62; neomycin and furazolidone resistance was found amongst the 1965 strains but not amongst the 1960–62 strains.

Infective resistance was easily demonstrated; tetracycline resistance was transferred from one tetracycline-resistant strain of E. coli to 37 of 38 tetracycline-sensitive strains at the first attempt.

Most ampicillin, streptomycin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, neomycin and sulphonamide resistance was of the infective type; the furazolidone resistance in all of eight strains studied was not shown to be infective.

In the experiments to demonstrate the presence of infective resistance the level of drug resistance was usually found to be the same in donor and recipient strains.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, E. S. (1965). Origin of transferable drug-resistance factors in enterobacteriaceae. Br. med. J. ii, 1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. S. & Datta, N. (1965). Resistance to penicillin and its transfer in enterobacteriaceae. Lancet i, 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. S. & Lewis, M. J. (1965). Drug resistance and its transfer in Salmonella typhimurium. Nature, Lond. 206, 579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Datta, N. (1962). Transmissible drug resistance in an epidemic strain of Salmonella typhimurium. J. Hyg., Camb. 60, 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. W. (1962). Antibiotics in Agriculture, p. 374. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Smith, H. W. & Halls, S. (1966 a). Observations on infective drug resistance in Britain. Br. med. J. i, 266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. W. & Halls, S. (1966 b). Observations by the ligated gut and oral inoculation methods on Escherichia coli infections in pigs, calves, lambs and rabbits. J. Path. Bad. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Smith, H. W. & Crabb, W. E. (1957). The effect of the continuous administration of diets containing low levels of tetracyclines on the incidence of drug-resistant Bacterium coli in the faeces of pigs and chickens; the sensitivity of the Bacterium coli to other chemo-therapeutic agents. Vet. Bee. 69, 24.Google Scholar
Sojka, W. J. (1965). Escherichia coli in domestic animals. Farnham, Bucks: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau.Google Scholar
Sojka, W. J. & Carnaghan, R. B. A. (1961). Escherichia coli infection in poultry. Res. vet. Sci. 2, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. (1961). Host specificity and enteropathogenicity of Escherichia coli. J. appl. Bact. 24, 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, T. (1963). Infective heredity of multiple drug resistance in bacteria. Bact. Rev. 27, 87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed