Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:43:37.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

International increase in Salmonella enteritidis: A new pandemic?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

D. C. Rodrigue*
Affiliation:
Enteric Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial Diseases, Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease ControlAtlanta, GA
R. V. Tauxe
Affiliation:
Enteric Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial Diseases, Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease ControlAtlanta, GA
B. Rowe
Affiliation:
Central Public Health Laboratory, Division of Enteric Pathogens, London, UK
*
* Daniel Rodrigue, CID:DBD:EDB 1-5428 M/S CO9, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA. 30333
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Over the past 5 years Salmonella enteritidis infections in humans have increased on both sides of the Atlantic ocean. The WHO salmonella surveillance data for 1979–87 were reviewed and show that S. enteritidis appears to be increasing on at least the continents of North America, South America, and Europe, and may include Africa. S. enteritidis isolates increased in 24 (69%) of 35 countries between 1979 and 1987. In 1979, only 2 (10%) of 21 countries with reported data reported S. enteritidis as their most common salmonella serotype; in 1987, 9 (43%) of 21 countries reported S. enteritidis as their most common serotype; 8 (89 %) of 9 were European countries. Although the reason for the global increase is not yet clear, investigations in individual countries suggest it is related to consumption of eggs and poultry which harbour the organism.

Type
Special Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

References

REFERENCES

1.St. Louis, ME, Morse, DL, Potter, ME et al. , The emergence of grade A eggs as a major source of Salmonella enteritidis infections. New implications for the control of salmonellosis. J Amer Med Assoc 1988; 259: 2103–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Anonymous. Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4: Chicken and egg. Lancet 1988; ii: 720–2.Google Scholar
3.United Nations. 1986 Demographic Yearbook. 38th issue. New York: United Nations 1988.Google Scholar
4.Velimirovic, B. Infectious diseases in Europe. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, 1984; 207–50.Google Scholar
5.Habiyaremye, I, Mutwewingabo, A, Lemmens, P, Ghysels, G, Vandepitte, J. Shigella and salmonella in Butare, Rwanda 1981–84. Anna Soc Belge Med Trop 1986; 66: 4756.Google Scholar
6.Lubwama, SW. Human salmonella serotypes in Uganda, 1967–1982. East African Med J 1985; 62: 260–5.Google ScholarPubMed
7.Gaislerova, V, Janouskova, I. A survey of isolation of salmonellae from people in the South Moravian region of Czechoslovakia in the period 1977–1981. Cesk Epidemiol, Mikrobiol, Immunol (Praha) 1984; 33: 216–20.Google Scholar
8.Laszlo, VG, Erzsebet, SC, Baszti, J. Phage types and epidemiological significance of Salmonella enteritidis strains in Hungary between 1976 and 1983. Acta Microbiologic Hungarica 1985; 32: 321–40.Google Scholar
9. Anonymous. Bol Epidemiol Semanal 1986; 1753: 247–8.Google Scholar
10.Thebaud-Mony, A, Lepetit, C. Mise au point sur l'épidémie d'infections à Salmonella entéritidis. Bull Epidémiol Hebdom, 1988; 38: 151.Google Scholar
11.Rosdahl, N. Gastroenteritis caused by Salmonella enteritidis in a day nursery – epidemiological observations regarding an infection which was primarily food-borne. Ugeskrift for Laeger 1980; 142, 2795–9.Google Scholar
12.Paul, J, Batchelor, B. Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 hens' eggs. Lancet 1988; ii: 1421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Mawer, SL, Spain, GE, Rowe, B. Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 and hens' eggs. Lancet 1989: ii: 280–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Humphrey, TJ, Cruickshank, JG, Rowe, B. Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 and hens' eggs. Lancet 1989; i: 281.Google Scholar
15.Coyle, EF, Palmer, SR, Ribiero, CD et al. , Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 infection – association with hen's eggs. Lancet 1988; ii: 1295–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Ager, EA, Nelson, KE, Galton, MM et al. , Two outbreaks of egg-borne salmonellosis and implications for their prevention. J Amer med Assoc 1967; 199: 372–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Thatcher, FS, Montford, J. Egg products as a source of Salmonella in processed foods. Canad J Pub Health 1962; 53: 61–9.Google ScholarPubMed
18.Peel, B. Occurrence of Salmonella in raw and pasteurized liquid whole egg. Queensland J Agriculture Animal Sci 1976; 33: 1321.Google Scholar
19.Snoeyenbos, GH, Smyser, CF, Van Roekel, H. Salmonella infections of the ovary and peritoneum of chickens. Avian Dis 1969; 13: 668–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Faddoul, GP, Fellows, GW. A five-year survey of the incidence of salmonella in avian species. Avian Dis 1966: 10: 296304.Google Scholar
21.Gordon, RF, Tucker, JF. The epizoology of Salmonella menston infection of fowls and the effect of feeding poultry food artificially infected with salmonella. Brit Poultry Sci 1965; 6: 251–64.Google Scholar
22.Clark, GMcC, Kaufman, AF, Gangarosa, EJ, Thompson, M. Epidemiology of an international outbreak of Salmonella agona. Lancet 1973; ii: 490–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Craven, PC, Packel, DDC, Baine, WB, Barker, WH, Gangarosa, EJ. International outbreak of Salmonella eastborne infections traced to contaminated chocolate. Lancet 1975; i: 788–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.O'Brien, TF, Hopkins, JD, Gilleece, ES et al. , Molecular epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella from animal and human beings in the United States. New Engl J Med 1982: 307: 16.Google Scholar
25.Wachsmuth, K. Genotypic approaches to the diagnosis of bacterial infections; plasmid analysis and gene probes. Infect Control 1985; 6: 100–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Ward, LR, DeSa, JDH, Rowe, B. A phage typing scheme for Salmonella enteritidis infection in chicks. Vet Rec 1989; 124: 223.Google Scholar