Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:26:09.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Isolation of mycobacteria from dairy creamery effluent sludge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

P. R. J. Matthews ,
P. Collins  and
P. W. Jones
P. R. J. Matthews
Affiliation:
Institute for Research on Animal Diseases, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire
P. Collins
Affiliation:
Institute for Research on Animal Diseases, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire
P. W. Jones
Affiliation:
Institute for Research on Animal Diseases, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Sixty three samples of dairy creamery effluent were examined for the presence of mycobacteria. Thirty two strains were isolated from 27 samples. These were classified as follows: M. fortuitum (13), M. peregrinum (6), M. gordonae (5), M. marianum (scrofulaceum) (4), unidentified (4).

Ten strains, representative of the groups isolated, were tested for their effect on experimental animals. None were pathogenic for guinea pigs or mice but a number produced a minimal amount of skin sensitization in guinea pigs to avian and mammalian tuberculin.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 76 , Issue 3 , June 1976 , pp. 407 - 413
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

References

REFERENCES

Cowan, S. T. & Steel, K. J. (1970). Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. E. & Smith, M. M. (1953). Rapidly growing acid-fast bacteria i. Species descriptions of Mycobacterium phlei Lehmann and Neumann and Mycobacterium smegmatis (Trevisan) Lehmann and Neumann. Journal of Bacteriology 66, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, P. W., Bew, J. & Gammack, D. B. (1975). The potential animal health hazard of dairy effluent sludge. Journal of Hygiene 75, 143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, R. J. & Jenkins, D. E. (1965). Mycobacteria isolated from soil. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 11, 127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, R. J., Jenkins, D. E. & Hsu, K. H. K. (1966). Raw milk as a source of mycobacteria Canadian Journal of Microbiology 12, 979.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kubica, G. P. & Vitvitsky, J. (1974). Comparison of two commercial formulations of the MacConkey agar test for mycobacteria. Applied Microbiology 27, 917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marks, J. (1972). Classification of the mycobacteria in relation to clinical significance. Tubercle 53, 259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reznikov, M. & Leggo, J. H. (1974). Examination of soil in the Brisbane area for organisms of the Mycobacterium avium – intracellulare-scrofulaceum complex. Pathology 6, 269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Runyon, E. H. (1959). Anonymous mycobacteria in pulmonary disease. Medical Clinics of North America 43, 273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaeffer, W. B. (1965). Serologic identification and classification of atypical mycobacteria by agglutination. American Review of Respiratory Diseases 92, 85.Google Scholar
Stuart, P. (1965). Vaccination against Johne's disease in cattle exposed to experimental infection. British Veterinary Journal 121, 289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Virtanen, S. (1960). A study of Nitrate Reduction by Mycobacteria. The use of Nitrate Reduction Test in the identification of mycobacteria. Acta tuberculosea scandinavica 48, suppl.Google ScholarPubMed
Wayne, L. G. (1961). Recognition of Mycobacterium fortuitum by means of a three day phenolphthalein sulfatase test. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 36, 185.Google Scholar
Wayne, L. G. (1962). Differentiation of mycobacteria by their effect on Tween 80. American Review of Respiratory Diseases 86, 579.Google ScholarPubMed