Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T04:38:15.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Isolation of Shigella sonnei by fluid media

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

T. H. Price
T. H. Price
Affiliation:
Regional Public Health Laboratory, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Selenite F broth prepared in the laboratory from single ingredients was found to be significantly more efficient than nutrient broth in the isolation of Shigella sonnei from human faeces. It was more efficient than direct plating on deoxycholate citrate agar for diagnosing Sonne dysentery in a local outbreak. The difference was significant. There was, however, no significant advantage for enrichment over direct plating when stools posted from Bristol to Cardiff were examined.

Laboratory prepared selenite F broth was preferable to the same medium purchased commercially from two different firms. The product of one firm was significantly better than that of the other.

Two methods of sterilization of laboratory prepared selenite F broth were studied. Seitz filtered selenite was less inhibitory to the growth of small numbers of Shigella sonnei. Sterilization by heating in free steam for periods of 15 mm and over impaired the ability of selenite F broth to allow multiplication of small numbers of Shigella sonnei.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 77 , Issue 3 , December 1976 , pp. 341 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

References

REFERENCES

Armstrong, E. C. (1954). The relative efficacy of culture media in the isolation of Shigella sonnei. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 13, 70.Google ScholarPubMed
Braun, H., & Well, A. J. (1928). Über den Ruhrbazillus Kruse-Sonne. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde, Imfectionekrankheiten und Hygiene. (Abt. I, Orig.) 109, 16.Google Scholar
Brodie, J. (1942). Modified Leifson media for the isolation of B. dysenteriae and pathogenic members of the colon-typhoid group. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 54, 499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crone, P. B. (1948). The counting of surface colonies of bacteria. Journal of Hygiene 46, 426.Google ScholarPubMed
Dartevelle, Z., & Desmet, L. (1975). Recherche de Shigella en mer et dans un estuaire. III. Détermination in vitro de la durée de survie de S. sonnei YCD en eau de mer. Annales de Microbiologie (Paris) 126B, 101.Google Scholar
Ewing, W. H. (1972). Identification of Enterobacteriaseae, 3rd ed. Minneapolis: Burgess.Google Scholar
Gillespie, E. H., & Gibbons, S. A. (1975). Autoclaves and their dangers and safety in laboratories. Journal of Hygiene 75, 475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S., & Price, T. H. (1974). Isolation of salmonellas. Public Health Laboratory Service Monograph Series, no. 8. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. W. S., Price, T. H., & Crone, P. B. (1975). Quality control tests of two sal monella enrichment media using different inocula. Journal of Hygiene 74, 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, Betty C., & Allison, V. D. (1945). Studies on the isolation of Bact. typhosum and Bact. paratyphosum B. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Emergency Public Health Laboratory Service 4, 12.Google ScholarPubMed
Hutchinson, R. I. (1956). Some observations on the method of spread of Sonne dysentery. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 15, 110.Google ScholarPubMed
Lancet, (1970). Editorial: Can bacteriologists agree? Lancet i, 664.Google Scholar
SilltKer, J. H., Deibel, R. H., & Fagan, P. T. (1964). Enhancing effect of faeces on isolation of Salmonellae from selenite broth. Applied Microbiology 12, 10.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. I., & Schelhart, D. (1968). Isolation of shigellae. V. Comparison of enrichment broths with stools. Applied Microbiology 16, 1, 383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, Mair E. M. (1954). Disadvantages of the rectal swab in the diagnosis of diarrhoea. British Medical Journal ii, 394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassiliadis, P., Pateraki, E., Papadikis, J., & Trichopoulous, D. (1974). Evaluation of the growth of salmonellae in Rappaport's Broth and in Muller–Kauffman's tetrathionate broth. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 37, 411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vassiliads, P., Pateraki, E., & Politi, G. (1966). Comportement des shigella dans le milieu d'enrichissement au sélénite. Bulletin de la Société de Pathologic exotique 59, 31.Google Scholar