Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:13:59.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lactose-Fermenting Bacteria in Faeces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Alfred MacConkey
Alfred MacConkey
Affiliation:
(Senior Assistant Bacteriologist, Serum Department, Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The following experiments were begun with the object of ascertaining the distribution in nature of certain lactose-fermenting organisms which are by some grouped under the name Bacillus coli, but by others are regarded as belonging to a different class of organisms; a difference of opinion which is most probably the principal factor in causing the value of B. coli as an index of pollution to be such a vexed question among bacteriologists. The investigation, however, resolved itself into a search for the B. lactis aerogenes principally, and secondarily for the other lactose fermenters. Incidentally certain other points are referred to which it was thought might prove of interest though not actually pertaining to the subject of the paper.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , July 1905 , pp. 333 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1905

References

Abbott, A. C. (1902). Principles of Bacteriology, p. 432.Google Scholar
Booker, W. D. (1891). Centralbl. f. Bakt., X. p. 284.Google Scholar
Brown, R. T. (1903). Journ. Royal Army Medical Corps, Vol. I. p. 425.Google Scholar
Clairmont, , Paul, (1902). Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, Vol. XXXIX. p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durham, H. E. (1900–1901). Journ. of Experimental Medicine, p. 354.Google Scholar
Durham, H. E. (1898). British Medical Journ., Vol. I. p. 1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, , and Keith, (1894). Centralbl. f. Bakt., I. Ref. XVI. p. 838.Google Scholar
Ehrenfest, (1896). Centralbl. f. Bakt., Ref. XX. p. 593.Google Scholar
Elsner, (1896). Zeitschr. f. Hyg., XXI. p. 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyre, J. W. H. (1904). Lancet, Vol. I. p. 648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fermi, C. (1898). Centralbl. f. Bakt., Abth. I. XXIII. p. 208.Google Scholar
Ford, W. W. (1901). Journal of Med. Research, Vol. VI. p. 211.Google Scholar
Gabritschewsky, G. (1902). Centralbl. f. Bakt., I. Orig. XXXII. p. 256.Google Scholar
Grimbert, L. (1896). Annales de l'institut Pasteur, Vol. X. p. 708.Google Scholar
Grimbert, L. (1896). Compt. Rend. Société de Biologie, p. 722.Google Scholar
Grimbert, and Legros, (1901). Centralbl. f. Bakt., I. Ref. p. 434.Google Scholar
Annal. de l'inst. Pasteur, 1900, XIV. p. 479.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, and Hume, (1902). Brit. Med. Journ., Vol. I. p. 1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammerl, H. (1897). Centralbl. f. Bakt., I. Ref. XXII. p. 706.Google Scholar
Heinick, E. (1903). Centralbl. f. Bakt., I. Ref. XXXIII. p. 734.Google Scholar
Hellströ, (1901). Centralbl. f. Bakt., I. Ref. p. 309.Google Scholar
Hewlett, R. T. (1902). Manual of Bacteriology, pp. 280, 314, 485.Google Scholar
Horrocks, W. H. (1903). Journ. of Royal Army Medical Corps, Vol. I. p. 362.Google Scholar
Horrocks, W. H. (1901). Journ. of Hyg., Vol. I. p. 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, A. C. (1902–1903). Supplement to Rep. of Med. Offic. to Local Govt. Board, p. 511.Google Scholar
How, Freeland. (1904). Centralbl. f. Bakt.. I. Orig. XXXVI. p. 484.Google Scholar
Irons, E. E. (1902). Journ. of Hyg., Vol. II. p. 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G. A. (1904). Journ. of Infect. Diseases, Vol. I. p. 348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, E. O. (1901). Journ. of Hyg., Vol. I. p. 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, E. O. (1903). Journ. of Hyg., Vol. III. p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klotz, (1904). Journ. of Med. Research, Vol. XI. p. 478.Google Scholar
Kohlbrügge, J. H. F. (1901). Centralbl. f. Bakt., I. p. 20.Google Scholar
Kruse, (1903). Centralbl. f. Bakt., I. Orig. XXXIV. p. 737.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Neumann, (1904). Bacterial Diagnosis, pp. 206, 207, 211, 239, 291.Google Scholar
Lembke, (1896). Archiv f. Hyg., XXVI.,Google Scholar
Centralbl. f. Bakt., I. Ref. XX. p. 615.Google Scholar
MacConkey, Hill, (1901). “Bile Salt Broth”. Thompson Yates Lab. Reports, Vol. IV. Part I. p. 151.Google Scholar
Moore, A. (1902). Brit. Med. Journ., Mar. 22.Google Scholar
Muir, Ritchie, (1902). Manual of Bacteriology, pp. 168, 191, 309.Google Scholar
Orlowski, (1897). Centralbl. f. Bakt., I. Ref. XXII. p. 134.Google Scholar
Péré, M. A. (1898). Annales de l'inst. Pasteur, Vol. XII. p. 63.Google Scholar
Prescott, S. G. (1903). Centralbl. f. Bakt., I. Ref. XXXIII. p. 279.Google Scholar
Radziewsky, A. (1900). Zeitschr. f. Hyg., Vol. XXXIV. p. 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remy, (1900). Annales de l'inst. Pasteur, Vol. XIV. p. 705.Google Scholar
Rothberger, J. (1900). Zeitschr. f. Hyg., Vol. XXXIV. p. 84.Google Scholar
Savage, W. G. (1905). Journ. of Hyg., Vol. V. p. 149.Google Scholar
Smith, Theobald (1891). Centralbl. f. Bakt., X. p. 181.Google Scholar
Smith, Theobald (1895). Centralbl. f. Bakt., XVIII. pp. 1, 494, 589.Google Scholar
Strong, L. W. (1899). Centralbl. f. Bakt., I. XXV. p. 49.Google Scholar
Voges, Proskauer (1898). Zeitschr. f. Hyg., Vol. XXVIII. p. 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissenfeld, (1900). Zeitschr. f. Hyg., XXXV. p. 78.Google Scholar
Winslow, C. E. A. (1902). Centralbl. f. Bakt., I. Ref. XXXI. p. 306.Google Scholar