Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:30:01.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Long Term Experiment with Rats on a Human Dietary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

John Boyd Orr ,
William Thomson  and
R. C. Garry
John Boyd Orr
Affiliation:
From the Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen
William Thomson
Affiliation:
From the Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen
R. C. Garry
Affiliation:
From the Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For 2¼ years a large colony of rats was maintained on a diet based on a dietary survey of a human population. One-half of the rats was fed on the human survey diet, or this diet with a small increase in milk, the other half on the same diet supplemented with additional milk and green food. Four generations of animals were reared, all from the same stock.

The rats on the human diet with additional milk and green food were healthy in all respects so far as can be judged from our own rats on a stock diet and from the data of other workers.

On the other hand, in spite of an exactly similar environment and heredity, the animals without additional milk and green food, showed:

(1) a slightly impaired reproductive capacity;

(2) a very markedly increased death-rate due to increased susceptibility to an infection to which all rats were equally exposed;

(3) a definitely slower rate of growth;

(4) a lower haemoglobin content in the blood; and,

(5) a clinically poorer condition as judged by behaviour and state of the coat.

These findings are discussed and the possibility of applying them to human dietetic problems briefly touched upon.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , December 1935 , pp. 476 - 497
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1935

References

REFERENCES

Beard, H. H. and Myers, V. C. (1933). Amer. J. Physiol. 106, 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethke, R. M. and Edgington, B. H. (1927). Proc, Amer. Soc. Animal Prod. 13.Google Scholar
Bethke, R. M. et al. (1932). J. Biol. Chem. 98, 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethke, R. M. (1933). J. Agri. Res. 47, 331.Google Scholar
Clark, M. L. (1929). Lancet, i, 1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corry, Mann H. C. (1926). Med. Res. Counc. Sp. Rep. Ser. 105.Google Scholar
Cox, W. M. and Imboden, M. (1934 a). J. Biol. Chem. 105, Proc. 18.Google Scholar
Cox, W. M. and Imboden, M. (1934 b). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 32, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, L. S. P. et al. (1933). Brit. Med. J. i, 685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, W. (1910). Swine. Sanders Pub. Co., Chicago, III.Google Scholar
Donaldson, H. H. (1924). The Rat. Wistar Institute, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Faber, A. and Norgaard, A. (1934). Haandbog I. Di´etetik, Levin and Munksgaard, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Gorter, F. J. (1934). Nature, 134, 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guha, B. C. (1934). Ind. J. Ped. 2, 30.Google Scholar
Hatai, S. (1917). Amer. J. Anat. 21, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, F. Gowland (1912). J. Physiol. 44, 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, F. Gowland and Neville, A. (1913). Biochem. J. 7, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellermann, J. H. (1934). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. and Animal Industr. 2, 649.Google Scholar
Kon, S. K. (1931). Biochem. J. 25, 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, B. and Howland, J. (1932). J. Nutrition, 5, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, G. and Clark, M. L. (1929). Lancet, i, 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, G. and McKinley, P. L. (1930). Milk Consumption and the Growth of School Children. H.M. Stationery Office, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Levine, H. et al. (1932). J. Nutrition, 5, 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, D. T. (1933). Amer. J. Physiol. 105, Proc. 71.Google Scholar
McCarrison, R. (1927 a). Ind. J. Med. Res. 14, No. 3.Google Scholar
McCarrison, R. (1927 b). IbidGoogle Scholar
McCarrison, R. (1931). Brit. Med. J. i, 966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCulloch, W. E. (1929–30). West African Med. J. 3.Google Scholar
McGonigle, G. C. M. (1933 a). Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 26, 677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGonigle, G. C. M. (1933 b). Med. Officer, 49, 215, 225.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, L. et al. (1931). J. Nutrition, 4, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, H. S. and Miller, L. (1931). Amer. J. Physiol. 98, 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, J. B. (1928). Lancet, i, 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, J. B. and Clark, M. L. (1930). Ibid ii, 59.Google Scholar
Orr, J. B. and Gilks, J. L. (1931). Med. Res. Counc. Sp. Rep. Ser. 155.Google Scholar
Report of Committee on Nutrition (1933). Brit. Med. Assoc., London.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, L. C. (1931). Amer. J. Dis. Child. 41, 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, H. C. et al. (1921). J. Biol. Chem. 46, 503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, H. C. and Crocker, J. (1922 a). Ibid 53, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, H. C. and Muhlfeld, M. (1922 b). Ibid 53, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, H. C. and Todhunter, E. N. (1934). J. Nutrition, 8, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmonds, N. (1924). Amer. J. Hyg. 4, 1–108 (suppl.).Google Scholar
Slonaker, J. R. (1931 a). Amer. J. Physiol. 96, 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slonaker, J. R. (1931 b). Ibid 96, 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slonaker, J. R. (1931 c). Ibid 97, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slonaker, J. R. (1931 d). Ibid 97, 32.Google Scholar
Slonaker, J. R. (1931 e). Ibid 97, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slonaker, J. R. (1931 f). Ibid 97, 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenbock, H. (1923). Science, 58, 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiebeling, H. K. (1933). U.S. Dept. Agri. Misc. Publ. No. 183.Google Scholar
Sure, B. et al. (1928). J. Nutrition, 1, 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turbott, H. B. and Rolland, A. F. (1932). New Zealand Med. J. 31, 109.Google Scholar
Van Donk, E. C. et al. (1934). Amer. J. Physiol. 107, 616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar