Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T09:05:01.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new, surface-antigen-adsorbed influenza virus vaccine. I. Studies on immunogenicity in hamsters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. Jennings ,
C. W. Potter ,
C. McLaren  and
Margaret Brady
R. Jennings
Affiliation:
Academic Division of Pathology (Virology), University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX
C. W. Potter
Affiliation:
Academic Division of Pathology (Virology), University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX
C. McLaren
Affiliation:
Academic Division of Pathology (Virology), University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX
Margaret Brady
Affiliation:
Evans Biologicals Ltd, Speke, Liverpool L24 9JD
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The ability of a new, surface-antigen-adsorbed influenza virus vaccine to induce serum antibody in hamsters, and to protect these hamsters against subsequent homologous virus challenge, is reported. In addition, similar studies in hamsters have also been carried out using the surface antigen material prior to adsorption to the aluminium hydroxide carrier. The new, adsorbed vaccine is at least as effective as inactivated saline influenza virus vaccine in inducing serum antibody and protection in hamsters; the unadsorbed surface antigen material, however, did not confer protection to hamsters challenged subsequently with homologous virus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 75 , Issue 3 , December 1975 , pp. 341 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

References

REFERENCES

Allison, A. C. & Davies, A. J. S. (1971). Requirement of thymus-dependent lymphocytes for potentiation by adjuvants of antibody formation. Nature, London 233, 330–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aymard-Henry, M., Coleman, M. T., Dowdle, W. R., Layer, W. G., Schild, G. C. & Webster, R. G. (1973). Influenza virus neuraminidase and neuraminidase-inhibition test procedures. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 48, 199–202.Google ScholarPubMed
Brandon, F. B., Barrett, C. P. Jr, Hook, A. E. & Lease, G. O.. (1967). Human febrile response to influenza virus or its ether isolated haemagglutinins. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 125, 683–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fazekas De St Groth, S., Withell, J. & Lafferty, K. J. (1958). An improved assay for neutralizing antibodies against influenza viruses. Journal of Hygiene 56, 415–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedewald, W. F. & Hook, E. J. Jr. (1948). Influenza virus infection in the hamster. A study of inapparent virus infection and virus adaptation. Journal of Experimental Medicine 88, 343–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamaoka, T. & Katz, D. H. (1973). Cellular site of action of various adjuvants in antibody responses to hapten-carrier conjugates. Journal of Immunology 111, 1554–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobson, D., Beare, A. S. & Ward-Gardner, A. W. (1971). Haemagglutination-inhibiting serum antibody titres as an index of the response of volunteers to intranasal infection with live, attenuated strains of influenza virus. Proceedings of Symposium on Live Influenza Vaccines, Zagreb, pp. 73–84. Yugoslavian Academy of Sciences and Arts.Google Scholar
Jennings, H. & Potter, C. W. (1973). Enhanced response to influenza A vaccines in hamsters primed by prior heterotype influenza infection. Archiv für die gesamte Virusforschung 42, 197–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jennings, R., Brand, C. M., McLaren, C., Shepherd, L. & Potter, C. W. (1974). The immune response of hamsters to purified haemagglutinins and whole influenza virus vaccines following live influenza virus infection. Medical Microbiology and Immunology 160, 295–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maillard, J. & Bloom, B. R. (1972). Immunological adjuvants and the mechanism of cell co-operation. Journal of Experimental Medicine 136, 185–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, C. W., Jennings, R., Marrine, W. M. & McLaren, C. (1973). Potentiation of the antibody response to inactivated A2/Hong Kong vaccines by previous heterotypic influenza virus infection. Microbios 8, 101–10.Google ScholarPubMed
Potter, C. W., Jennings, R., Rees, R. C. & McLaren, C. (1973). Antibody response of hamsters to A2/Hong Kong virus vaccine after priming by heterotypic virus infection. Infection and Immunity 8, 137–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulman, J. L., Khakpour, M. & Kilbourne, E. D. (1968). Protective effects of specific immunity to viral neuraminidase on influenza virus infection of mice. Journal of Virology 2, 778–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, R. M. & Parodi, A. S. (1942). Use of hamster (Cricetus auratus) for detection of influenza virus in throat washings. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 49, 105–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, R. B. & Later, W. G. (1966). Influenza virus subunit vaccines: Immunogenicity and lack of toxicity for rabbits of ether and detergent-disrupted virus. Journal of Immunology 96, 596–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed