Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:45:38.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Estimation of Metabolism from Determinations of Carbon Dioxide Production and on the Estimation of External Work from the Respiratory Metabolism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Towards the close of the Great War, when economy of food consumption was an urgent necessity, considerable attention was paid to the determination of the energetic needs of various kinds of muscular work. The majority of scientific papers then published dealt with the problem.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1923

References

REFERENCES

Benedict, F.G. and Cathcart, E.P. (1913). Muscular Work, Publication No. 187 of the Carnegie Institute of Washington, U.S.A.Google Scholar
cathcabt, E.P. and Orr, J.B. (1919). The Energy Expenditure of the infantry Recruit in Training, H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Dunlucr, Lord and Greenwood, M. (1918). Medical Research Committee, Special Report No. 13.Google Scholar
Gairns, S. and O'Brien, M.K. (1922). journal of Insdustrial Hygiene, IV. 283.Google Scholar
Greenwood, M.Hodson, C. and Tebb, A.A. (1919–20). Proc. Roy Soc B, XOI 62.Google Scholar
Greenwood, M. and Thompson, C.M. (1918). Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. Sect. Epidem. XI. 61.Google Scholar
Hill, L. and Campbell, J.A. (1921). Brit. Med. Journ. I. 733.Google Scholar
Lavoisier, (1862). (Euvres (Paris), II. 688704.Google Scholar
Obr, J.B. and Kinloch, J.P. (1921). Brit. Med. Journ. II. 39.Google Scholar
Rosenheim, O. (19191920). Proc. Roy. Soc. B, XCI. 44.Google Scholar
Waller, A. (19191920). Proc. Roy. Soc. p. 166.Google Scholar
Waller, A., De, Decker G. (19191920). Proc. Roy. Soc. p. 229.Google Scholar
Waller, A. (1921). Brit. Med. Journ. 2. 627.Google Scholar