Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:33:28.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paratyphoid Fever and Aertrycke Enteritis in Aberdeen—a Contrast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

F. J. T. Bowie ,
J. Parlane Kinloch  and
J. Smith
F. J. T. Bowie
Affiliation:
(From the Health Department, City of Aberdeen.)
J. Parlane Kinloch
Affiliation:
(From the Health Department, City of Aberdeen.)
J. Smith
Affiliation:
(From the Health Department, City of Aberdeen.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the Medical Research Council's Special Reports, Nos. 91 and 92, and in the Journal of Hygiene, vol. XIV. No. 1, July, 1925, W. G. Savage and P. Bruce White stress the desirability of restricting the term “B. paratyphosus B” to the organism of paratyphoid fever and nothing else, and of designating the organism that most commonly causes food-poisoning outbreaks as B. aertrycke, and not as B. paratyphosus B (type aertrycke). In view of the fact that the features of a paratyphoid fever outbreak due to infected ice-cream, and of an aertrycke enteritis due to infected pork as occurring in Aberdeen in 1925 emphasise the distinction between paratyphoid fever and aertrycke enteritis, it has seemed well to record these two outbreaks in some detail for the purpose of contrasting them the one with the other and with the milkborne Gaertner enteritis which is recorded in the preceding paper.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , November 1926 , pp. 444 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1926