Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T22:02:00.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The pathogenicity of variola virus: A comparison of the growth of standard strains of variola major and variola minor viruses in cell cultures from human embryos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2010

K. R. Dumbell  and
D. G. T. Wells
K. R. Dumbell
Affiliation:
St. Mary's Hospital Medical School, London W2
D. G. T. Wells
Affiliation:
St. Mary's Hospital Medical School, London W2
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The international reference strains of variola major (Harvey) and of variola minor (Butler) were grown in cultures of skin and muscle cells from human embryos. The development of infective virus, complement-fixing antigen, haemagglutinin and cytological changes were followed at four temperatures between 35 and 40 °C. No significant difference was found in the amount of virus produced by Harvey or Butler viruses at any of the experimental temperatures, but Harvey attained the plateau titre at 16 h, some 4 h ahead of Butler in the cultures incubated at 38 °C. Harvey also produced a higher and more prolonged yield of virus in the extracellular medium of cultures, inoculated at low multiplicity and incubated at 37 °C. At 38 °C small inocula of Harvey produced foci which developed and spread till the whole culture was necrotic; Butler foci did not spread and remained relatively undeveloped at this temperature.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 89 , Issue 3 , December 1982 , pp. 389 - 397
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

References

REFERENCES

Bedson, H. S. & Cruickshank, J. G. (1969). The relation of the DNA polymerase to an early temperature-sensitive event in the replication of variola virus. Journal of General Virology 4, 413–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. J. & Bedson, H. S. (1973). Temperature-sensitive events in the growth of alastrim virus in chick embryo cells. Journal of General Virology 21, 239–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cruickshank, J. G. & Bedson, H. S. (1968). Temperature-sensitive events in the growth of variola virus in He La cells. Journal of General Virology 3, 256–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumbell, K. R., Bedson, H. S. & Rossier, E. (1961). The laboratory differentiation between variola major and variola minor. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 25, 73–78.Google ScholarPubMed
Dumbell, K. R. & Huq, F. (1975). Epidemiological implications of the typing of variola isolates. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 69, 303–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurvich, E. B. & Marennikova, S. S. (1964). Laboratory diagnosis of smallpox and similar viral diseases by means of tissue culture methods. III. Additional modes of differentiating viruses of the pox group in tissue culture. Acta Virologica 8, 435–442.Google Scholar
Hahon, N., Ratner, M. & Kozikowsi, E. (1958). Factors influencing variola virus growth on the chorioallantoic membrane of embryonated eggs. Journal of Bacteriology 75, 707–712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helbert, D. (1957). Smallpox and Alastrim. Use of the chick embryo to distinguish between the viruses of variola major and variola minor. Lancet i, 1012–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, K. & Helbert, D. (1960). A comparison of the haemagglutinins of variola, alastrim, vaccinia, cowpox and ectromelia viruses. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 79, 416–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nizammudin, Md. & Dumbell, K. R. (1961). A simple laboratory test to distinguish the virus of smallpox from that of alastrim. Lancet i, 68–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar