Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:59:38.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Progress of Ankylostomiasis in Cornwall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

A. E. Boycott
Affiliation:
(Form the Gordon Pathological Laboratory, Guy's Hospital.)
J. S. Haldane
Affiliation:
(Form the Gordon Pathological Laboratory, Guy's Hospital.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Ankylostomiasis was first discovered in men working in Cornish mines in October, 1902 (this Journal, Vol. III. p. 95), though there had been many cases of illness clearly referable to this cause for some eight years previously. The number of men who were too ill to do their ordinary work was greater about two years before the cause of “Dolcoath anaemia” was identified. These men had either stopped at home or had been employed on the surface instead of underground: in this way they had avoided further infections, and in many cases had progressed towards a spontaneous cure. At the time therefore of our first enquiry the number of sick men was less than it had been. Anaemic miners were, however, still very numerous and, without anything like an exhaustive search among the 750 underground hands at Dolcoath mine, we found 14 men with less than 50 p.c. haemoglobin and 19 more with less than 75 p.c. The general pallor prevalent among the men on looking at a shift as a whole was very striking, and complaints of shortness of breath on climbing the ladders were frequent. The disease, in short, was at that time a meterial hindrance in carrying on the work of the mine.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1909

References

page 264 note 1 This Journal, Vol. IV. 1904, p. 437.Google Scholar

page 265 note 1 See Report to the Home Secretary on the Health of Cornish Miners, by J. S. Haldane, J. S. Martin and R. A. Thomas, Cd. 2091, 1904, p. 31 and figure 6.

page 267 note 1 The simple blood examination is of course not applicable under these circumstances.

page 267 note 2 Lancet, Vol. III. 1905, p. 490.Google Scholar

page 268 note 1 Mines rendues réfractaires à l'ankylostome par des eaux salées de filtration, par A. Manouvriez, Valenciennes, 1905.

page 268 note 2 Lancet, Vol. I. 1908, p. 102.Google Scholar

page 269 note 1 See Second Report of the Royal Commission on Mines, Parliamentary Paper, 1909, p. 182.

page 270 note 1 French, and Boycott, , This Journal, Vol. V. (1905), p. 274.Google Scholar

page 270 note 2 Galli-Valerio, B., Centralbl. für Bakteriol.. Orig. Vol. XLIV. (1907), p. 531.Google Scholar