Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:26:45.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A quantitative risk assessment for the occurrence of campylobacter in chickens at the point of slaughter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2001

E. HARTNETT
Affiliation:
Department of Risk Research, Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Surrey, KT15 3NB
L. KELLY
Affiliation:
Department of Risk Research, Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Surrey, KT15 3NB
D. NEWELL
Affiliation:
Department of Bacterial Diseases, Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Surrey, KT15 3NB
M. WOOLDRIDGE
Affiliation:
Department of Risk Research, Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Surrey, KT15 3NB
G. GETTINBY
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics and Modelling Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G1 1XH
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A quantitative risk assessment model investigating the risk of human infection with campylobacter from the consumption of chicken meat/products is currently being formulated. Here such an approach is used to evaluate the probability that a random bird, selected at slaughter from Great Britain's national poultry flock, will be campylobacter-positive. This is determined from the probability that a flock chosen at random contains at least one colonized bird and the within-flock prevalence of such a flock at slaughter. The model indicates that the probability bird chosen at random being campylobacter-positive at slaughter is 0·53. This probability value has associated uncertainty, the 5th percentile being 0·51 and the 95th percentile 0·55. The model predicts that delaying the age at first exposure to campylobacter can have a significant impact on reducing the probability of a bird being campylobacter-positive at slaughter. However, implementation of current biosecurity methods makes this difficult to achieve.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2001 Cambridge University Press