Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:01:20.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relevance of the anti-human globulin (Coombs) test and the complement-fixation test in the diagnosis of brucellosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

D. G. McDevitt
D. G. McDevitt
Affiliation:
Department of Therapeutics and Pharmacology, Queen's University of Belfast
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The relationship between the serological findings for brucellosis and the epidemiological factors has been studied in veterinary surgeons in Northern Ireland. The anti-human globulin (Coombs) test and the complement-fixation test for brucella were used in two groups of veterinary surgeons, those self-employed and those employed by the Ministry of Agriculture.

Significant serological differences were found to exist between the two groups. Those in private practice showed changes related to age, cattle skin rash, reactions to S. 19 vaccine accidents and symptoms suggestive of brucellosis in the past or the last year. But those working for the Ministry only showed titre changes related to the length of their private practice experience before joining the Ministry. In neither group was there a relationship between serological findings and the type of milk drunk or any particular group of symptoms suggestive of brucellosis.

The findings indicate that high titres to brucella by the Coombs and complement-fixation test can occur in people repeatedly exposed to infection at work. Titres which would be of diagnostic importance in the rest of the population may be of little diagnostic significance even when they are as high as 160 Coombs and 128 complement fixation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 68 , Issue 2 , June 1970 , pp. 173 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

References

REFERENCES

Bartram, H. G., Bothwell, P. W., Jebb, W. H. H., McDiarmid, A. & Preston, A. E. (1963). Brucella abortus agglutinins in the sera of pregnant women and blood donors. British Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine 17, 95.Google ScholarPubMed
Bradstreet, C. M. P. & Taylor, C. E. D. (1962). Technique of complement fixation test applicable to the diagnosis of virus diseases. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and Public Health Laboratory Service 21, 96.Google Scholar
Dalrymple-Champneys, W. (1929). Undulant fever with special reference to animal sources of infection and the possibility of its prevalence in England and Wales. Reports on Public Health and Medical Subjects, Ministry of Health, no. 56.Google Scholar
Dalrymple-Champneys, W. (1960). Brucella Infection and Undulant Fever in Man. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, A. C., Robinson, F. H. & Baumgartner, L. (1938). Studies on chronic brucellosis. IV. An evaluation of the diagnostic laboratory tests. Public Health Reports, Washington 53, 1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, R. J. (1967). Brucellosis in the dairy-farming community and allied workers of Worcestershire. Lancet ii, 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heremans, J. F., Vaerman, J. P. & Vaerman, C. (1963). Studies on the immune globulins of human serum. II. A study of the distribution of anti-brucella and anti-diphtheria antibody activities among gamma-SS, gamma-IM and gamma-IA globulin fractions. Journal of Immunology 91, 11.Google Scholar
Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Brucellosis (1964). 4th Report. Technical Report Series, World Health Organization, no. 289.Google Scholar
Kerr, W. R., Coghlan, J. D., Payne, D. J. H. & Robertson, L. (1966 a). Chronic brucellosis in the practising veterinary surgeon. Veterinary Record 79, 602.Google Scholar
Kerr, W. R., Coghlan, J. D., Payne, D. J. H. & Robertson, L. (1966 b). The laboratory diagnosis of chronic brucellosis. Lancet ii, 1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancet, Annotation (1966). Brucellosis among veterinary surgeons. Lancet ii, 952.Google Scholar
McDevitt, D. G. (1968). Studies in Human Brucellosis. M.D. Thesis, Queen's University, Belfast.Google Scholar
McDevitt, D. G. & McCaughey, W. J. (1969). Brucellosis in Northern Ireland—a serological survey. Journal of Hygiene 67, 409.Google Scholar
MacDonald, A. & Elmslie, W. H. (1967). Serologieal investigations in suspected brucellosis. Lancet i, 380.Google Scholar
Reddin, J. L., Anderson, R. K., Jenness, R. & Spink, W. W. (1965). Significance of 7S and macroglobulin brucella agglutinins in human brucellosis. New England Journal of Medicine 272, 1263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spink, W. W. (1951). What is chronic brucellosis? Annals of Internal Medicine 35, 358.Google ScholarPubMed
Spink, W. W. (1956). The Nature of Brucellosis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Spink, W. W., McCullough, N. B., Hutchings, L. M. & Mingle, C. K. (1952). Diagnostic criteria for human brucellosis. Journal of the American Medical Association 149, 805.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. M. & Merrifield, F. V. O. (1951). The anti-globulin (Coombs) test in brucellosis. Lancet ii, 913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar