Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:33:23.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sero/subtyping of Neisseria meningitidis isolated from patients in Spain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. A. Vazquez
Affiliation:
Servicio de Bacteriología, Centra Nacional de Microbiologí, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28220 Majadahonda (Madrid), Spain
C. Marcos
Affiliation:
Servicio de Bacteriología, Centra Nacional de Microbiologí, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28220 Majadahonda (Madrid), Spain
S. Berron
Affiliation:
Servicio de Bacteriología, Centra Nacional de Microbiologí, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28220 Majadahonda (Madrid), Spain
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To know the types of meningococcal strains in Spain, we serotyped and subtyped 743 Neisseria meningitidis isolates recovered between 1990 and 1992 from patients. A great number of serogroup B, serogroup C and non-groupable meningoccoci reacted with the serotyping reagents while many serogroup C and non-groupable isolates did not react with the serosubtyping reagents (78·2% and 54·8 % respectively); only 8·9 % of serogroup B meningococci were non-subtypeable (NST). Distribution of serotypes was similar in serogroup C and in non-groupable strains. Isolates showed great variability in antigenic phenotypes (71 in serogroup B, 20 in serogroup C and 25 in non-groupable meningococci). The most frequent antigenic combinations were 4:P1. 15 (39·8%) in serogroup B, 2b:NST (55·8%) in serogroup C and 2b:NST (35·6%) in non-groupable meningococci.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

References

REFERENCES

1.Abdillahi, H, Poolman, JTWhole-cell ELISA for typing Neisseria meningitidis with monoclonal antibodies. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1987; 48: 367–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Bjune, G, Høiby, EA, Grønnesby, JK et al. . Effect of outer membrane vesicle vaccine against group B meningococcal disease in Norway. Lancet 1991; 338: 1093–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Sierra, GVG, Campa, HC, García, IL et al. , Efficacy evaluation of the Cuban vaccine VA-MENGOC-BC against disease caused by serogroup B Neisseria meningitidis. In: Achtman, M, Kohl, P, Marchal, C, Morelli, G, Seiler, A, Thiesen, B, eds. Neisseriae 1990. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1991; 129–34.Google Scholar
4.Käyhty, H, Poolman, J, Abdillahi, H et al. , Sero and subtypes of group B meningococci causing invasive infections in Finland in 1976–87. Scand J Infect Dis 1989; 21: 527–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Scholten, RJPM, Bijlmer, HA, Poolman, JT et al. , Meningococcal Disease in the Netherlands, 1958–1990; A steady increase in the incidence since 1982 partially caused by new serotypes and subtypes of Neisseria meningitidis. Clin Infect Dis 1993; 16: 237–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Tzanakaki, G, Blackwell, CC, Kremastinou, J, Weir, DM, Mentis, A, Fallon, RJSerogroups, serotypes and subtypes of Neisseria meningitidis isolated from patients and carriers in Greece. J Med Microbiol 1993; 38: 1922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Sáez-Nieto, JA, Fenoll, A, Vázquez, JA, Casal, JPrevalence of maltose-negative Neisseria meningitidis variants during an epidemic period in Spain. J Clin Microbiol, 1982; 15: 7881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Sáez-Nieto, JA, Llacer, A, Catalá, F, Fenoll, A, Casal, JMeningitis meningocócica en España (1978–1980) I. Estudios epidemiológicos, serogrupos y sensibilidad a antimicrobianos. Revista de Sanidad e Higiene Publica 1981; 55: 831–69.Google Scholar
9.Berrón, S, Sáez-Nieto, JA, Vázquez, JAAplicación de marcadores epidemiológicos en cepas Neisseria meningitidis con sensibilidad disminuida a penicilina aisladas en España (1985–1990). Revista Española de Quimioterapia 1992; 5: 3541.Google Scholar
10.Jones, DM, Kaczmarski, EBMeningococcal infections in England and Wales: 1991. Comm Dis Rep 1992; 2: 61–3.Google ScholarPubMed