Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:32:53.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sewer and drain swabbing as a means of investigating salmonellosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. W. S. Harvey  and
T. H. Price
R. W. S. Harvey
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff
T. H. Price
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The use of gauze swabs in drains or sewers to clarify the path followed by a salmonella from source to human host has been reviewed in the light of experience gained in Cardiff over 15 years. This period has seen a marked change in attitudes to salmonella epidemiology in that infected food is now regarded as of greater importance than infected food handlers. In these 15 years, butchers, abattoirs and knackers' yards, markets and bakehouses have been monitored. In the bakehouse survey the existence of staff infection was demonstrated by sewage examination. Sewage investigation has also been used to show frequent entry of salmonellas into households in a residential estate. The estate was carefully chosen to exclude salmonellas from industrial sources and shops. The frequent finding of infection in this sewage implies that a commonly consumed heavily infected food item is involved. The wide range of serotypes isolated suggests an animal usually fed on infected animal feed. Poultry and pigs are put forward as animals liable to spread salmonellosis to man.

It is hoped that clarification of the salmonella pathway may eventually lead to measures likely to prevent the transmission of infection to man. It is also suggested that swabs placed in abattoir drains serve as an economical method of obtaining warning of a persistent build-up of contamination. The persistence of a serotype in an abattoir is not infrequently followed by human infection.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 68 , Issue 4 , December 1970 , pp. 611 - 624
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, E. S. (1968). Drug resistance in Salmonella typhimurium and its implications. British Medical Journal iii, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. S. & Lewis, M. J. (1965). Drug resistance and its transfer in Salmonella typhimurium. Nature, London 206, 579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, E. S. & Wilson, E. M. J. (1961). Die Bedeutung der Salmonella typhimurium-Phagen-Typisierung in der Human und Veterinärmedizin. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde, Infektionskrankheiten und Hygiene. (Abt. I Originale) 181, 368.Google Scholar
Brede, H. D. (1964). Les Salmonelloses au Sud de L'Afrique. In The World Problem of Salmonellosis. Junk. The Hague, p. 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, L. N. & Rhodes, F. (1969). Salmonellae in chicken giblets. Medical Officer 122, 31.Google Scholar
Guth, F. (1916). Selennährböden für die elektive Züchtung von Typhusbacillen. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde und Infektionskrankheiten (Abt. I Originale) 77, 487.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. W. S. (1956). Choice of a selective medium for the routine isolation of members of the salmonella group. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 15, 118.Google ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S. (1957). The epidemiological significance of sewage bacteriology. British Journal of Clinical Practice 11, 751.Google ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S. (1965). A study of the factors governing the isolation of salmonellae from infected materials and the application of improved techniques to epidemiological problems. M.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. W. S. & Phillips, W. P. (1955). Survival of Salmonella paratyphi B in sewers: its significance in investigation of paratyphoid outbreaks. Lancet ii, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, R. W. S. & Phillips, W. P. (1961). An environmental survey of bakehouses and abattoirs for salmonella. Journal of Hygiene 59, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, R. W. S. & Price, T. H. (1967 a). The isolation of salmonellas from animal feeding stuffs. Journal of Hygiene 65, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, R. W. S. & Price, T. H. (1967 b). The examination of samples infected with multiple salmonella serotypes. Journal of Hygiene 65, 423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S. & Price, T. H. (1968). Elevated temperature incubation of enrichment media for the isolation of salmonellas from heavily contaminated materials. Journal of Hygiene 66, 377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S., Price, T. H., Bate, W. & Allen, D. R. (1963). An outbreak of food poisoning caused by Salmonella typhimurium, phage-type 12, probably spread by infected meat. Journal of Hygiene 61, 419.Google ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S., Price, T. H. & Dixon, J. M. S. (1966). Salmonellas of subgenus III (Arizona) isolated from abattoirs in England and Wales. Journal of Hygiene 64, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, R. W. S., Price, T. H., Foster, D. W. & Griffiths, W. C. (1969). Salmonellas in sewage. A study in latent human infection. Journal of Hygiene 67, 517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heard, T. W., Jennett, N. E. & Linton, A. H. (1969). The incidence of salmonella excretion in various pig populations from 1966 to 1968. British Veterinary Journal 125, 635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ino, J. & Graber, C. D. (1955). Recovery of salmonella from contaminated cultures. United States armed Forces Medical Journal 6, 586.Google ScholarPubMed
Knox, R., Gell, P. G. H. & Pollock, M. R. (1943). The selective action of tetrathionate in bacteriological media. Journal of Hygiene, 43, 147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leifson, E. (1936). New selenite enrichment media for the isolation of typhoid and paratyphoid (salmonella) bacilli. American Journal of Hygiene 24, 423.Google Scholar
Loureiro, J. A. De (1942). A modification of Wilson and Blair's bismuth sulphite agar (stabilized stock solutions). Journal of Hygiene 42, 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, B. (1948). Detection of paratyphoid carriers in towns by means of sewage examination. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 7, 241,Google Scholar
Moore, B., Perry, E. L. & Chard, S. T. (1952). Survey by sewage swab method of latent enteric infection in an urban area. Journal of Hygiene 50, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, F., Konforti, N. & Navon, B. (1956). A new enrichment medium for certain salmonellae. Journal of Clinical Pathology 9, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Report (1964 b). Salmonellae in abattoirs, butchers' shops and home-produced meat, and their relation to human infection. Journal of Hygiene 62, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reports (1959–1966). Food poisoning in England and Wales, 1958 to 1965. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 18, 169; 19, 224; 21, 180; 22, 200; 23, 189; 24, 321; 25, 194.Google Scholar
Thomson, S. (1953). Paratyphoid fever and bakers' confectionery: an analysis of an epidemic in South Wales in 1952. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 12, 187.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilson, W. J. & Blair, E. M. McV. (1931). Further experience of the bismuth sulphite media in the isolation of Bacillus typhosus and B. paratyphosus B from faeces, sewage, and water. Journal of Hygiene 31, 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar