Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:08:53.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sources of Infection in Undulant Fever

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. Smith
J. Smith
Affiliation:
From the City Hospital Laboratory, Aberdeen
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Samples of milk from 183 cows were examined, and seventeen (9·2 per cent.) yielded Br. abortus.

2. Two hundred and two samples of butter, margarine, cheese, and icecream failed to yield Br. abortus, although samples of locally prepared butter and cheese both contained tubercle bacilli.

3. Examination of the serum from slaughtermen and men working in allied trades showed some evidence of latent infection, but no indication of much real illness due to Br. abortus.

4. Examination of the sera of sheep failed to show any evidence that these animals become infected with Br. abortus.

5. The examination of sera and organs from pigs failed to show any evidence that the porcine type of Br. abortus occurs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , June 1934 , pp. 242 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1934

References

REFERENCES

Beattie, C. P. (1932). Lancet, 1, 1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beijers, J. A. (1932). Tijdschr. Diergeneesk. 59, 1221.Google Scholar
Boak, R. A. and Carpenter, C. M. (1930). J. Inf. Dis. 46, 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrieu, M. and Lafenêtre, M. (1932). Le Lait, 12, 779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connaway, J. W. (1922). J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 15, 219.Google Scholar
Dible, J. H. and Pownall, M. (1932). J. Hygiene, 32, 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, L. D. and Spray, R. S. (1920). J. Infect. Dis, 27, 165.Google Scholar
Duff, H. M. (1933). J. Comp. Path. and Therap. 46, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, C. P., Delez, A. L. and Boyd, W. L. (1930). J. Amer. Vet. Med. Assoc. 76, 17.Google Scholar
Gilman, H. L. and Burnet, E. L. (1931). Rep. New York State Vet. Coll. for 1929–30, 109.Google Scholar
Good, E. S. and Smith, W. V. (1916). J. Inf. Dis. 27, 165.Google Scholar
Hieronymi, E. (1932). Deutsche Tierärzte Wchnschr. 40, 593.Google Scholar
Hoeden, J. van der (1931). Z. f. Infektionskr. d. Haust. 42, 1.Google Scholar
Huddleson, I. F. and Emmel, M. W. (1929). Michigan Agr. Sta. Tech. Bull. 103, 30.Google Scholar
Hultén, O. (1931). Svensk Vet. Tidskr. 38, 25.Google Scholar
James, W. A. and Graham, R. (1930). J. Amer. Vet. Med. Assoc. 77, 774.Google Scholar
Lerche, (1931). Z. f. Infektionskr. d. Haust. 38, 253.Google Scholar
Lockhart, A. (1932). Vet. Med. 27, 171.Google Scholar
Magnusson, H. (1932). Skand. Vet. Tidskr. 22, 95.Google Scholar
Mazé, R. and Césari, E. (1931). C. R. Biol. 5, 630.Google Scholar
Meissner, H. and Koser, A. (1931). Deutsche Tierärzte Wchnschr. 39, 693.Google Scholar
Morgan, W. P. (1932). Lancet, 1, 1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, W. (1931). Schweiz. med. Wchnschr. 61, 970.Google Scholar
Panisset, L. and Delbé, P. (1932). Rev. Gén. Méd. Vét. 41, 670.Google Scholar
Planz, J. F. and Huddleson, I. F. (1931). J. Amer. Vet. Med. Assoc. 79, 251.Google Scholar
Priestley, A. H. (1932). Lancet, 1, 1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringard, P. and Hilger, A. (1928). Bull. Acad. Vét. 1, 272.Google Scholar
Smith, J. (1932). J. Hygiene, 32, 354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P. (1933). J. Canad. Med. Assoc. 29, 9.Google Scholar
Thomsen, A. (1931). Rev. Gén. Med. Vét. 40, 457.Google Scholar
Traum, J. (1914). Ann. Rep. Dept. Agr., Wash. D.C. p. 86.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. S. (1932). Veter. Rec. 12, 1240.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. S. and Nutt, M. M. (1926). J. Path. and Bact. 29, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar