Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:04:26.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Statistical control in haematology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

H. O. Lancaster
H. O. Lancaster
Affiliation:
From the School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Sydney
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The value of ‘Statistical control’ in haematology has been demonstrated. After a short historical survey of the chief contributions to the theory of the technique of counting and of the application of the Poisson distribution in biology, the statistical theory of the distribution of cells in the haemocytometer is briefly described and examples are given of large sample methods of testing goodness of fit. Some of the author's counts are considered.

In the red cell counts a ‘crowding’ effect is noted by which the variance between the counts on the individual squares on the haemocytometer is reduced. This effect is trivial in white cell counting owing to the small proportion of the area occupied, but is important in reducing the variance between the numbers of red cells on individual small haemocytometer squares. A quadratic function adequately describes the regression of the variance on the mean for fixed size of haemocytometer square, for the usual range of red cell density. This function, calculated on the basis of the author's own counts also describes Berkson's findings on crowding adequately and is not, considering the approximations involved, inconsistent with the theoretical discussion on crowding. Reasons are given for believing that the crowding effect is only trivial if blocks of 16 squares are compared in red cell counting.

The methods of statistical control, suggested by R. A. Fisher's work, are introduced. It is shown that they give satisfactory results when applied to some of the author's own counts. The methods are used to discuss the consistency of the counts of certain medical graduates and technicians. The methods are suitable for a review of the literature with the object of examining the internal consistency of the counts made by various authors.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , December 1950 , pp. 402 - 417
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1950

References

REFERENCES

Abbé, E. (1878). Ueber Blutkörper-Zählung. S.B. Jena. Ges. Med. Naturw. no. 48.Google Scholar
Armitage, P. (1949). An overlap problem arising in particle counting. Biometrika, 36, 257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkson, J. (1938). Some difficulties of interpretation encountered in the application of the chi-square test. J. Amer. statist. Ass. 33, 526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkson, J., Magath, T. B. & Hurn, M. (1935). Laboratory standards in relation to chance fluctuations of the erythrocyte count as estimated with the hemocytometer. J. Amer. statist. Ass. 30, 414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkson, J., Magath, T. B. & Hurn, M. (1939). The error of estimate of the blood cell count as made with the hemocytometer. Amer. J. Physiol. 128, 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bortkiewicz, L. (1898). Das Gesetz der kleinen Zahlen. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Eisenhart, C. & Wilson, P. W. (1943). Statistical methods and control in bacteriology. Bact. Rev. 7, 57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, R. A. (1948). Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 10th ed., London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A., Thornton, H. G. & Mackenzie, W. A. (1922). The accuracy of the plating method of estimating the density of bacterial populations. Ann. appl. Biol. 9, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. & Yates, F. (1948). Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research, 3rd ed.London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Garwood, F. (1947). The variance of the overlap of geometrical figures with reference to a bombing problem. Biometrika, 34, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodall, A. (1908). Review of Student (1906). Folia haemat., Lpz., 5, 430.Google Scholar
Lyon, J. F. & Thoma, R. (1881). Ueber die Methode der Blutkörperzählung. Virchows Arch. 84, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magath, T. B., Berkson, J. & Hurn, M. (1936). The error determination of the erythrocyte count. Amer. J. clin. Path. 6, 568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plum, P. (1936). Accuracy of haematological counting methods. Acta med. scand. 90, 342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poisson, S. D. (1837). Recherches sur la probabilité des jugements, pp. 205et seq. Paris.Google Scholar
‘Student’ (1907). On the error of counting with a haemocytometer. Biometrika, 5, 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Student’ (1919). An explanation of deviations from Poisson's law in practice. Biometrika, 12, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, L. (1914). On Poisson's law of small numbers. Biometrika, 10, 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yule, G. U. & Kendall, M. G. (1950). An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics, 14th ed.London: Griffin.Google Scholar