Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:29:12.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Statistical Examination of the Significance and Comparative Value of Milk Agar for Raw and Pasteurised Milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Harold Barkworth
Harold Barkworth
Affiliation:
Dairy Bacteriologist, South Eastern Agricultural College, Wye, Kent
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The use of 1 per cent, milk agar gives a significant increase in colony numbers for both raw milk and pasteurised milk at all levels of count. There is a marked increase with pasteurised milk on the 1/100 and 1/1000 plates. Milk agar also gives better colony growth, tending to more rapid and accurate counting. With raw milk there is no correlation between the increase and the count on standard agar.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , June 1936 , pp. 169 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1936

References

Barkworth, H. (1935). Proc. Soc. Agric. Bact., Rep. Ann. Conf.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1930). Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 3rd ed., pp. 99 and 194.Google Scholar
Hiscox, E. R., Hoy, W. A., Lomax, K. L. and Mattick, A. T. R. (1932). J. Dairy Res. 4, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provan, A. L. (1935). Min. Agric. Ann. Meeting Dairy Bacteriologists.Google Scholar
Thomas, S. B. (1934). Welsh J. Agric. 10, 295.Google Scholar