Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:19:31.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Study Of English Diets By The Individual Method: Part I. Men

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

E. M. Widdowson
E. M. Widdowson
Affiliation:
From the Biochemical Department, King's College Hospital, London
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A study of the freely chosen diets of sixty-three men of the English middle class has been made by the “individual” method. All food was weighed for the period of a week, and the amounts of protein, animal protein, fat, carbohydrate, calories, calcium, total and available phosphorus and total and available iron in the individual diets have been calculated. Detailed and averaged results for the diets are given.

2. The average calorie intake was 3067 per day, but a very wide variation was observed (1772–4955 calories), and it is suggested that the adoption of 3000 calories as the requirement of an individual man may be most misleading.

3. There was a definite, but mathematically insignificant, decrease in calorie intake with increasing age. The individual variation at each age was so great, however, that no rules for the guidance of individuals as to their dietary requirements at different ages can possibly be formulated.

4. No significant correlation existed between calorie intake and body weight.

5. The proportion of calories derived from fat was higher than any figures previously recorded in this country. The proportion of calories derived from carbohydrate was correspondingly lower.

6. The total calcium, phosphorus and iron intakes were 0·87 g., 1·61 g. and 16·8 mg. per day respectively. 98 per cent, of the total phosphorus eaten was in an “available” form, while only 66 per cent, of the iron could be considered to be physiologically available.

7. A similar study has been carried out on six unemployed men, and the chemical composition of these diets is compared with that of employed, middle-class individuals.

Acknowledgments. The author wishes to thank Dr R. A. McCance for his enthusiastic encouragement and help, Miss M. Verdon-Roe for her assistance with the calculations, and all the subjects of the investigation for their willing co-operation. Part of the expense of this investigation were defrayed by a personal grant from the Medical Research Council.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , July 1936 , pp. 269 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1936

References

REFERENCES

Actuarial Society Of America (1929). Medical Impairment Study.Google Scholar
Atwater, W. O. (1902). U.S. Dept. Agric. Farmers' Bull. 142, 88.Google Scholar
Banning, C. (1931 a). Acta Brevia Neerland, 1, 29.Google Scholar
Banning, C. (1931 b). Ned. Tijdschr. v. Geneesk. 46, 5620.Google Scholar
Beard, H. H. (1927). Amer. J. Physiol. 82, 577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigwood, E. J. and Roost, G. (1934). L'Alimentation Rationelle. Inst. Soc. Solway, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Bottazzi, F. (1935). Nutrition Abstr. and Rev. 5, 275.Google Scholar
British Medical Association (1933). Report of Committee on Nutrition.Google Scholar
Brooks, F. P. (1929). Amer. J. Physiol. 89, 403.Google Scholar
Browning, E. (1935). Med. Press, 190, 101.Google Scholar
Bruce, H. M. and Callow, R. K. (1934). Biochem. J. 28, 517.Google Scholar
Burnet, Et. and Aykroyd, W. R. (1935). Quart. Bull. Health Organisation of the League of Nations.Google Scholar
Burns, C. M. (1933). J. State Med. 41, 414.Google Scholar
Cathcart, E. P. (1931). Nutrition Abstr. and Rev. 1, 6.Google Scholar
Cathcart, E. P. and Murray, A. M. T. (1931 a). J. Nutrition, 3, 483.Google Scholar
Cathcart, E. P. and Murray, A. M. T. (1931 b). Med. Res. Counc. Spec. Rep. Series, No. 151.Google Scholar
Cathcart, E. P. and Murray, A. M. T. (1932). Ibid. No. 165.Google Scholar
Chittenden, R. H. (1905). Physiological Economy in Nutrition.Google Scholar
Clark, M. L. (1933). Brit. Med. J. ii, 977.Google Scholar
Davidson, L. S. P. and Fullerton, H. W. et al. (1933). Brit. Med. J. i, 685.Google Scholar
Denis, W. and Borgstrom, P. (1924). J. Biol. Chem. 61, 109.Google Scholar
Enghoff, H. and Wastl, H. (1933). Skand. Arch. f. Physiol. 67, 47.Google Scholar
Escudero, P. (1933). Rev. sudamer. Med. et Chir. 4, 161.Google Scholar
Flux, A. W. (1930). J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 93, 538.Google Scholar
Greenwood, M. (1934). XXIIe Session Inst. Internat. Statistique. Londres, Sect. 3, p. 15.Google Scholar
Hawley, E. (1927). U.S. Dept. Agric., Tech. Bull. No. 8, Washington.Google Scholar
Hawley, E. (1929). U.S. Dept. Agric. Circular, No. 89.Google Scholar
Heinbecker, P. (1928). J. Biol. Chem. 80, 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heupke, W. (1934). Münch. Med. Wochenschr. 81, 353.Google Scholar
Hill, A. B. (1925). J. Hygiene, 24, 189.Google Scholar
Hindhede, M. (1934). Münch. Med. Wochenschr. 81, 722.Google Scholar
Hornemann, (1913). Z. f. Hygiene, 75, 553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, W. H. and Cowie, W. J. (1934). Welsh J. Agric. 10, 83.Google Scholar
League of Nations (1932). Quart. Bull, of the Health Organisation.Google Scholar
League of Nations (1935). Report on the Physiological Bases of Nutrition.Google Scholar
Lusk, G.(1917). The Science of Nutrition, 3rd ed.Google Scholar
Makings, S. M. (1935). J. Minist. Agric. Engl. 42, 425.Google Scholar
Mccance, R. A. and Shipp, H. L. (1933). Med. Res. Counc. Spec. Rep. Series, No. 187.Google Scholar
Mccance, R. A. and Widdowson, E. M. (1935). Biochem. J. 29, 2694.Google Scholar
Mccance, R. A., Widdowson, E. M. and Shackleton, L. R. B. (1936). Med. Res. Counc. Spec. Rep. Series (in press).Google Scholar
Mckay, H. (1929). Ohio Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 433.Google Scholar
Mann, H. C. C. (1935). Lancet, i, 145.Google Scholar
Medical Research Council (1924). Med. Res. Counc. Spec. Rep. Series, No. 87.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health Advisory Committee on Nutrition (1934). The Criticism and Improvement of Diets.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health And Brit. Med. Assoc. Committees (1934). An Agreed Statement on Basic Requirements.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. (1935). J. Amer. Diet. Ass. 11, 28.Google Scholar
Moss, K. N. (1923). Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 95, 181.Google Scholar
Murlin, J. R. and Hildebrandt, F. M. (1919). Amer. J. Physiol. 49, 531.Google Scholar
Orr, J. B. (1936). Food, Health and Income. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Orb, J. B. and Clark, M. L. (1930). Lancet, ii, 594.Google Scholar
Paton, D. N., Dunlop, J. C. and Inglis, E. M. (1900). A Study of the Diet of the Labouring Classes in Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Paton, D. N. and Findlay, L. (1926). Med. Res. Counc. Spec. Rep. Series, No. 101.Google Scholar
Peller, S. (1919–20). Arch. f. soc. Hyg. u. Demogr. 13, 98.Google Scholar
Plimmer, R. H. A. (1913). Biochem. J. 7, 43.Google Scholar
Richards, A. I. and Widdowson, E. M. (1936). Africa, 9, 166.Google Scholar
Rowntree, S. (1902). Poverty. A study of Town Life. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Royal Society (1919). Food (War) Committee, Report. London.Google Scholar
Rubner, (1913). Arch.f. Hyg. 81, 179.Google Scholar
Shackleton, L. R. B. and Mccance, R. A. (1936). Biochem. J. 30, 582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, H. C. (1907). U.S. Office of Expt. Stations Bull. No. 185. Washington.Google Scholar
Sherman, H. C. (1920 a). J. Biol. Chem. 41, 173.Google Scholar
Sherman, H. C. (1920 b). Ibid. 44, 21.Google Scholar
Sherman, H. C. (1933). Chemistry of Food and Nutrition. New York.Google Scholar
Sherman, H. C. and Gillett, L. H. (1917). New York Assoc. for improving the condition of the poor, Pub. 121.Google Scholar
Sherman, H. C., Mettler, A. J. and Sinclair, J. E. (1910). U.S. Dept. of Agric. Office Expt. Stat. Bull. No. 227.Google Scholar
Stiebeling, H. K. and Ward, M. M. (1933). U.S. Dept. Agric. Circular, No. 296.Google Scholar
Süsskind, B. (1934). Z. Ver. deut. Zuker-Ind. 84, 341.Google Scholar
Tigerstedt, R. (1910). Skand. Arch.f. Physiol. 24, 97.Google Scholar
Tully, A. M. T. (1921). Lancet, ii, 57.Google Scholar
Tully, A. M. T. (1924). Glasgow Med. J. 101, N.S. 1.Google Scholar
Tyszka, v. (1932). Klin. Wochenschr. 2, 1169 and 1209.Google Scholar
Tyszka, v. (1934). Ernährung u. Lebenshaltung d. deutschen Volkes. Berlin.Google Scholar
Tyszka, v. (1935). Klin. Wochenschr. 14, 553 and 593.Google Scholar
Voit, (1881). Hermann's Handb. d. Physiol. 6, Part 1.Google Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. and Mccance, R. A. (1936). J. Hygiene, 36, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar